Samsung Swot
Samsung Swot
Samsung Swot
I. Executive
Introduction
Mission statement
Vision
Objectives
Strategies
II. Product Information
Products Introduction
Competitors
III. Methods
SWOT Analysis
Competitive Profile Matrix (CPM)
External Factor Evaluation (EFE) Matrix
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE) Matrix
SPACE Matrix
Grand Strategy Matrix
Quantitative Strategic
Planning Matrix (QSPM)
Samsung
Problem
o This issue is the result of the poor management of Samsung Electronic which effect
on both their vision and strategies in the competition with Apple.
o This is very dangerous and cannot gain as many Competitive Advantages as Apple
in general and to increase the sale as well as gain more market share with their
fourth generation smartphone in particular.
Samsung
o
Background
Founded by Lee Byung-chull
o 1950‟s Korean war lost all assets
Aimed to rebuild Korean economy manufacturing industry(sugar, fabrics)
Think globally and use of foreign labor
o 1969 SEC (Samsung Electronic Company) was founded
Apple Inc., Nokia OYJ, Intel Corporation, LG Display and LG Electronics, Sony Corporation,
Main Competitors Texas Instruments Inc., Lenovo Group Limited, Hewlett-Packard Company, Sanyo Electric Co.,
Ltd., Toshiba Corporation, SK Hynix Inc., Western Digital Corporation and others.
Samsung
Introduction
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. is the largest world’s technology company in terms of
revenues.
Samsung is a conglomerate that is consisting of numerous businesses around the
world, of course, so it’s not as though the company has nearly 300,000 people working
on Galaxy smartphones and tablets.
Samsung is the second biggest mobile phone producer in the world.
Samsung Mission
Electronics
Digital
To put into place the most
To create technology products and
efficient management and
services that lead the industry
production processes
To be the best
Digital-Electronics
Company
Company
To maintain a steadfast focus on strengthening our organization, on
continuing to be a global technology leader and trusted responsible
company
Samsung Vision
Develop innovative technologies and efficient processes that create new
markets, enrich people’s lives and continue to make Samsung a trusted
market leader.
Vision 2020
Inspire the World, Create the Future
Creative
Industry
Solutions
New Innovative
Technology Products Partner Employee
Samsung Objective
o Lead the digital convergence movement.
o Develop innovative technologies and efficient processes and continue to make
Samsung a trusted market leader.
o Look forward to exploring new territories, including health, medicine, and
biotechnology.
o Identify eight growth engines for Samsung's business including their Digital
Television (DTV) products and printers.
o Pursue innovation throughout all six main areas of the company's business
operations.
o Be one of the top three electronics companies in the world in quantity and in
quality by 2010.
o More than double its 2004 sales revenue by the year 2010.
o 20 number one market share products in the world by 2010 (currently the
company has eight number one market share products).
o Reaching $400 billion in revenue and becoming one of the world’s top five
brands by 2020.
Samsung
Strategies
Three strategies approaches under vision 2020
Creativity Partnership Profession
management
management
Increase external
capabilities and
New technology activities Talent
development Partner
incubator
collaboration/
New market
Environmental Passion and
creation management
challenge
New lifestyles Value for
customers/
shareholders
Critical Success factors Weight Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score Rating Score
Opportunities
A lot of countries encourage technology innovation and high-tech industry is really
0.03 3 0.09
important.
Countries value the protection of intellectual property 0.04 3 0.12
GDP and national income per capita increasing 0.12 3 0.36
Consumption pattern is changing from subsistence consumption to well spending
0.07 3 0.21
pattern
Samsung’s mobile phones have high attention 0.09 4 0.36
Growing India’s smartphone market 0.05 2 0.10
People more care about brand and quality than price 0.14 3 0.42
Threats
Legal issues with Apple 0.05 3 0.15
Price wars with Chinese phones 0.10 3 0.30
More and more new substitute and potential entrant 0.10 4 0.4
Strong competitors: Apple, Nokia, HTC… 0.12 4 0.48
The user experience is upgrading 0.09 3 0.27
Total 1.00 37 3.26
Internal Factor Evaluation (IFE)
Matrix
Key Internal factors Weights Rating Weighted Score
Strengths
Brand Recognition and Loyalty 0.07 3 0.21
A large number of products and broad product line 0.05 4 0.20
Strong research and development ability 0.10 3 0.30
Hardware integration with many open source OS and software 0.04 2 0.08
Innovation and fashion design, especially popular among younger peoples 0.15 4 0.60
With extensive sales channels and propaganda 0.06 3 0.18
Low production costs 0.03 3 0.09
Largest share in Smartphone industry ( 30% market share worldwide, extending its lead
0.15 4 0.60
over Apple and Nokia)
Weaknesses
Not high lighting Price/Performance Ratio 0.10 4 0.40
Lack its own OS and Software 0.07 4 0.28
Patent infringement 0.04 3 0.12
Too low profit margin 0.04 2 0.08
Limited high-end products 0.03 2 0.06
Focus on too many products, with inaccurate positioning 0.07 3 0.21
Total 1.00 44 3.41
Samsung SPACE Y
Matrix
Internal Strategy Position External Strategy Position
Countries value the protection of intellectual property 0.04 3 0.12 4 0.16 2 0.08
GDP and national income per capita increasing 0.12 4 0.48 4 0.48 1 0.4
Consumption pattern is changing from subsistence consumption to well
0.07 3 0.21 3 0.21 3 0.21
spending pattern
Samsung’s mobile phones have high attention 0.09 4 0.36 4 0.36 4 0.36
Growing India’s smartphone market 0.05 2 0.10 3 0.15 2 0.10
People more care about brand and quality than price 0.14 3 0.42 4 0.56 4 0.56
Threats
Legal issues with Apple 0.05 2 0.10 3 0.15 4 0.20
Price wars with Chinese phones 0.10 3 0.30 3 0.30 3 0.30
More and more new substitute and potential entrant 0.10 3 0.30 4 0.40 3 0.30
Strong competitors: Apple, Nokia, HTC… 0.12 4 0.48 4 0.48 4 0.48
The user experience is upgrading 0.09 3 0.27 3 0.27 4 0.36
Total 1.00 3.23 3.64 3.44
Quantitative Strategic Planning Matrix
(Cont.)
Strengths)
These two strategies in general, not only help Samsung overcome and solve
their existed issued but also help develop in the matter of long-term.
Samsung
Method
o In summary, there will be three main annual objectives that Samsung need to
complete include: