Civil Rights I

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

Civil Rights I

Legal Segregation and Discrimination


Civil Rights:
Civil Rights:
• Individual freedoms
• Ability to participate in society and politics
Civil Rights in America:
Civil Rights in America:
• Declaration of Independence
• United States Constitution
• United States Bill of Rights
• State laws
Civil Rights Denied:
Jim Crow Laws: state/local laws and
social customs requiring segregation
• Education
• Marriage and Family
• Public Accommodation
Civil Rights Denied:
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896):
• Segregation upheld by Supreme Court
• “Separate but equal”
Document #1: Utah State Law
Utah State Law (1943):
The following marriages are prohibited and
void
• Between a negro and white person.
• Between a Mongolian, member of the
Malay race or a mulatto, quadroon, or
octoroon, and a white person.
Document #2: Lynching picture
Document #3: Texas Poll Tax Receipt
Founded in 1909, the NAACP is the nation’s oldest civil rights organization. Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, the association led the black civil rights struggle in fighting injustices such as the denial of voting rights, racial violence, discrimination in employment, and
segregated public facilities. Dedicated to the goal of an integrated society, the national leadership has always been interracial, although the membership has remained predominantly African American.

Fighting for Civil Rights: Legal System


NAACP: National Association for
the Advancement of Colored
People
• Founded: 1909
• Goal: Integrated Society
• Anti lynching legislation
• Voting Rights
• Education
• Due process of law
NAACP: Attacks Segregation
•NAACP Attacks Segregated
Schools
• Houston University Lawyers
• Thurgood Marshall: “Mr. Civil
Rights”

“The complete destruction of all enforced


segregation is now in sight. . .We are going to
insist on non-segregation in American public
education from top to bottom—from law
school to kindergarten.”
—Thurgood Marshall, 1950
Brown V. Board of Education (1954):
Supreme Court rules on “Separate but Equal.”
-Plaintiff:
-Parents of African American Students in Topeka, Kansas
- Represented by Thurgood Marshall
-Defendant:
State of Kansas
Segregated School damage Kids:
Doll Test:
African American kids preferred the white doll over the black doll. Claiming the white
doll was smarter, prettier, and better behaved. This displayed the painful reality that black
children were being taught they were inferior by living in American society.
Brown V. Board of Education
Segregationist’s Argument:
1.The Constitution did not require white and African American children to
attend the same schools.
2.Social separation of blacks and whites was a regional custom; the states
should be left free to regulate their own social affairs.
3. Segregation was not harmful to black people.
4. Whites were making a good faith effort to equalize the two educational
systems. But because black children were still living with the effects of slavery,
it would take some time before they were able to compete with white children
in the same classroom.
Brown Vs. Board of Education: Decision
Decision: Chief Justice Earl Warren and the Warren Court
-Separate is unequal; violates 14th amendment
-Psychologically damages kids
-Overrules Plessy v. Fergusson

“Segregation of white and colored children in public schools has a detrimental effect upon the colored
children. The impact is greater when it has the sanction of the law, for the policy of separating the races
is usually interpreted as denoting the inferiority of the Negro group...Any language in contrary to this
finding is rejected. We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of ‘separate but equal’
has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. “
—Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court

You might also like