Design and Fabrication of Lake Cleaning Ro-Boat
Design and Fabrication of Lake Cleaning Ro-Boat
Design and Fabrication of Lake Cleaning Ro-Boat
PROJECT PHASE-1
ON
“DESIGN AND FABRICATION OF SOLAR OPERATED LAKE CLEANING MACHINE”
Submitted by:
KIRAN KUMAR A M RAVIKIRAN B S
USN – 1JS17ME414 USN – 1JS17ME434
RATHAN KUMAR S M SRI RAMULU
USN – 1JS17ME433 USN – 1JS17ME443
ZIGBEE TRASMITER
A POWER
R SUPPLY
D
ZIGBEE I
MODULE(XB U
EE) N PC OR SWITCHES
O (FOR CONTROL
RX MODULE)
ZIGBEE RECIEVER
POWER
SUPPLY
ZIGBEE
(RECIEVER)
A
R
DC
RELAY D
DC RELAY MOTOR
I
MOTOR
U
N
O
MATERIALS USED
Pvc pipes and fittings
Thermocoal
Ms framework like shaft,ms hollow pipe
Ball bearings
Dc motor
Arduino controller
Zigbee module
MICROCONTROLLER ARDUINO
An Arduino Mega microcontroller (ATmega2560), pictured in Figure, will be used to control
the stepper motors, sensors and future electronics. This platform was chosen for its low
cost, general availability, hack ability, expandability through shields, the expansive
learning resources available, the strong DIY community already using the platform, and the
fact that it is open source. In addition, Arduino programs are written in the C language and
therefore very familiar to many. Expansion shields likely to be used includes a RAMPS
stepper driver.
The Arduino Mega 2560 is a microcontroller board based on the ATmega2560. It has 54
digital input/output pins (of which 15 can be used as PWM outputs), 16 analog inputs, 4
UARTs (hardware serial ports), a 16 MHz crystal oscillator, a USB connection, a power jack,
an ICSP header, and a reset button. It contains everything needed to support the
microcontroller; simply connect it to a computer with a USB cable or power it with an AC
to-DC adapter or battery to get started.
Zigbee
In this two xBee (series 1) modules with the Arduino uno board. We will configure
them to act as a receiver and transmitter to control the brightness of an LED
wirelessly by using one potentiometer.
The xBee - series 1 - modules take the 802.15.4 stack (the basis for Zigbee) and
wrap it into a simple to use serial command set. These modules allow a very
reliable and simple communication between micro controllers, computers or
other systems by using just a serial port!
They can communicate up to 300 Ft (~100m), they have 2.4GHz frequency , use
the 802.15.4 protocol and have data rate up to 250kbps. They have also a 1mW
wire antenna on them. They supports Point to point and multi-point networks.
following fig shows that Xbee module(zigbee)
RELAY
Water can be used immediately following treatment. Some aquatic herbicides have restrictions on use of treated
water for drinking, swimming and irrigation. Also, plants are removed during mechanical harvesting and do not
decompose slowly in the water column as they do after herbicide application. In addition, oxygen content of the
water is generally not affected by mechanical harvesting, although turbidity and water quality may be affected
in the short term. Nutrient removal is usually insignificant because only small areas of lakes (1 to 2%) are
typically harvested; however, some nutrients are removed with the harvested vegetation. It has been estimated
that aquatic plants contain less than 30% of the annual nutrient loading that occurs in lakes. The habitat remains
intact because most harvesters do not remove submersed plants all the way to the lake bottom. Like mowing a
lawn, clipped plants remain rooted in the sediment and regrowth begins soon after the harvesting operation.
Mechanical harvesting is site-specific because plants are removed only where the harvester operates. If a
neighbor wants vegetation to remain along his or her lakefront, there is no movement of herbicides out of the
intended treatment area to damage the neighbor’s site. Herbicide concerns remain widespread despite extensive
research and much-improved application and despite use and registration requirements enforced by local
regulatory agencies. Mechanical harvesting, despite some environmental concerns (as outlined below), is
perceived to be environmentally neutral by the public. Utilization of harvested biomass is thought by many to
be a means of offsetting the relatively high costs and energy requirements associated with mechanical
harvesting. Unfortunately, no cost-effective uses of harvested vegetation have been developed, despite much
research .
EXPECTED OUTCOME
The project “River Waste Cleaning Machine” has designed which is very much economical, easy to operate
and helpful for water cleaning and it can be modified with more cleaning capacity and efficiency. Although
the design criterions with problems definitions which, however were overcome by using references &
teachers guidelines. The choice of raw materials helped us in machining of the various components to very
close tolerance and thereby minimizing the level of balancing problem. It is very useful for society.
Conclusion About 71 percent of the Earth's surface is water-covered and only about 0.3 percent of our fresh
water is found in the surface water of lakes, rivers, and swamps. In developing countries, 70 percent of
industrial wastes are dumped untreated into waters, polluting the usable water supply. On average, 22
million tons of fertilizers and chemicals are used each year. Project was designed with an intention of clean
the water debris floating on the lake, by using our drone we can collect many floating wastes like plastic
bottles, bags, flowers without any human interference and then dispose off the waste easily, one can clean
the lake just by operating it with the help of remote control. Also, our product help in reducing the water
pollutants to a certain extent. The major advantage is the safety provided by our product that is one need
not risk his life while he is cleaning the lake and we just need one person to control the boat. The product is
socially helpful for the laborers who clean the lake and economically viable. If the product is used in large
numbers, it would be a perfect example for „Technological application in environmental protection‟.
REFERENCES
[1] Finley, M.A., Courtenay S.C., Teather K.L., van den Heuvel, M.R. 2010. Assessment of northern
mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitud macrolepidotus) as an estuarine pollution monitoring species.
Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 44: 323 -332.
[2] Jiang Y. and Somers S. 2009. Modeling effects of nitrate from non-point sources on groundwater
quality in an agricultural watershed in Prince Edward Island, Canada. Hydrogeology Journal. Vol.
17(3): 707-724
[3] Mackenzie CL. 2005. Removal of sea lettuce, Ulva spp., in estuaries to improve the environments
for invertebrates, fish, wading birds, and eel grass, Zostera marina.Mar. Fish. Rev. Vol 67(4): 1 – 8.
[4] Rodd, V., Henry H, Mills A, Grimmett M, and Gentile R. 2011. Preliminary utilization of problematic
estuarien seaweed –“Sea Lettuce” in Agricultural Production. Agriculture and Agrifood Canada,
Unpublished Report.
[5] Schein, A., Courtenay S.C., Crane C.S., Teather K.L., and van den Heuvel, M.R. 2011. The role of
submerged aquatic vegetation in structuring the nearshore fish community within an estuary of the
southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Estuaries and Coasts December 2011,
[6] Sharp, G, Semple R, Connolly K, Blok R, Audet D, Cairns D and Courtenay S. 2003. Ecological
assessment of the Basin Head Lagoon: a proposed marine protected area.Canadian Manuscript
Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences # 2641. DFO.