Case Analysis For Zenith MR For HDTV P
Case Analysis For Zenith MR For HDTV P
Case Analysis For Zenith MR For HDTV P
MR for HDTV
Industry Analysis
• Mature and highly competitive
• Key Players: Thomson (22%), Zenith (12%), Philips (11%), Sony (6%)
• New products see high initial adoption then gradually slows down as
it matures (exhibit 2 – analogy with Color TV, VCR & Cable)
• High Volume & Low Margin
Sales ($)
9000000
8000000
7000000
6000000
5000000 Sales ($)
4000000
3000000
2000000
1000000
0
1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990
Zenith’s position in the industry
Category Rank 1 Zenith’s Rank
Repurchased RCA 2
Reputation Zenith 1
Latest Features Sony 2
Familiarity Zenith 1
Less Expensive Zenith 1
Recognition Zenith 1
Overall Brand Rating Zenith 1
HDTV Industry
Penetration 10.12 mn 25 mn
$1108
Unit Price of HDTV
Households with
TV 92100000 93393750 94687500 95981250 97275000 98568750 99862500 101156250 102450000
Forecast %
Cable 2 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 13.6
Household
Forecast
TV Households 3223500 6115875 14147250 17334600 25660950 29143275 37764600 35472525 44233575
Color TV 1842000 1893750 4734375 8511037.5 11527612.5 15480225 18672750 22801312.5 25964887.5
Cable 1842000 1893750 4734375 2944125 5810625 4046250 6938625 5200125 8733075
What Should Bruce Huber Do?
• Propose to adopt Aspect Ratio study, Secondary Research & Focus
Group research in 1990
• Innovators & Qualitative Research, WP7 research and Dealer Research
could be pursued in 1991
• Preference test in 1992
• Post launch Consumer Awareness survey in 1994
• Launch a pilot project and develop HDTV prototypes to learn consumer
responses through actual trial before launching actual model
• Collaborate with the Japanese to develop the HDTV prototypes and
working models
• saving R&D Cost – estimated around $50 million with $ 10 million
already invested in 1991
• Savings spent on improving marketing expenditure and even helping
the WP7 implement HDTV testing standard with sole sponsorship
Scenario’s defined
• Pessimistic Scenario
• HDTV broadcast issues are resolved
• HDTV sets are readily available
• Quality HDTV programming is not available
• Consumers do not see the benefit in paying higher price
• Sales will suffer and HDTV would only be able to penetrate 3-4 % of US
households. It would be a mix of the early penetration pattern of colour TVs
and projection TV.
• Most likely Scenario
• Sales are slow initially
• Sales pick-up after as good HDTV quality programmers are available
• Consumers slowly become willing to invest in a HDTV
• Sales would follow the pattern of the colour TV with slow initial sales but high
penetration (98%) of US households as the time progresses
Scenario’s continued…
• Optimistic Scenario
• Broadcast Standards are readily adopted.
• TV stations invest in new equipment and HDTV shows are
available.
• HDTV sets are readily available.
• Consumers think the superior sound and picture quality is
worth the higher price.
Alternatives for Zenith’s MR
Marketing Research Estimated Research Cost Launch Time
Miscellaneous 10 $50,000
Tentative Research Plan for 1990
Assumption: $500,000 allocated for
MR consecutively for 1991 & 1992
Assumption: WP7 Cost of $ 1mn divided equally among the top 5 players.
Other Initiatives
• Preference test can be conducted in 1992 @ 15% of the total marketing
budget allocated last year
• Consumer Awareness survey can be launched in 1994 @ 20% of the total
marketing budget (reference: 1991/92 budget)
• Internet flourishing in US by 1990 s and usage of internet to create HDTV
awareness could give Zenith the first mover advantage in internet
marketing
• Launch a pilot project and develop HDTV prototypes to learn consumer
responses through actual trial before launching actual model
• Collaborate with the Japanese to develop the HDTV prototypes and
working models
• saving R&D Cost – estimated around $50 million with $ 10 million already
invested in 1991
• Savings spent on improving marketing expenditure and even helping the
WP7 implement HDTV testing standard with sole sponsorship
Should Zenith undertake the Aspect Ratio Study?
• No, Zenith should not undertake the Aspect Ratio study as a tool
for marketing research
• Pros: The Aspect Ratio study could indicate
• customer aspect ratio preferences,
• determine preferences at different prices,
• changing preferences with program content &
• changing preferences with diagonal size variances
• Cons:
• Customers won’t have the experience of HDTV resolution which might
undermine the product benefit
• Large screen color TV’s are already proliferating – HDTV as wider TV only
might be seen as a variant of the same and not new innovation
Alternative Research Design
• Develop a pilot project and manufacture HDTV
prototypes to test customer preferences
• Collaboration with the Japanese can speed up the
process and lower R&D costs
• Customers can get real feel of the HDTV which would
help in its rapid adoption
• To be adopted by end of 1991
• saving R&D Cost – estimated around $50 million with $ 10
million already invested in 1991
• Savings spent on improving marketing expenditure and even
helping the WP7 implement HDTV testing standard with sole
sponsorship
Analogy to previous innovations – Assessing HDTV
Market Potential