EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016

F-PS-05-01

EMF Gap Analysis:

Transition Program to IATF 16949: 2016
FY 2018

IM “Elektromanufacturing”SRL

Revision date: 20.03.2018

Completed : Lungu Elena
Approved : Novacov Andrei
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
1. GAP Analysis Methodology
• Allocation of the IATF 16949: 2016 Requirements to EMF Business Processes
• Overview of all IATF 16949: 2016 Requirements
• Perform GAP Analysis Status
2. GAP Analysis Status
• Highlights from GAP Analysis
• Major changes in the QMS
• Documentation Requirements as per IATF 16949
• Internal Processes as per IATF 16949
• Organizational Changes
• Impact on Management Practices
3. EMF Transition Program from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949
• EMF Transition Program

• Resources Needed
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
1. GAP Analysis Methodology • Allocation of the IATF 16949: 2016 Requirements to EMF Business Processes

To perform GAP Analysis we use a specific tools (excel)

All IATF 16949 Requirements were allocated to Specific Business Process of EMF

Revision Revision
EMF Process Description Index:
1 Date:
28/10/2017

Site EMF Balti Year 2017

Management Processes (MP)
MP 1 MP 2 MP 3
EMF Business Model (QMS House)

Strategic Business Human Resource Quality Management

Planning Management System

Links:
CP 1 Marketing & Sales Process Evaluation "Site
Specific"

Respect of Relevenat Requirements

Interseted Parties Requirements

CP 2 Process Development (PDP)

Management Evaluation /
CP 2.1 Process
Specific Business Process of EMF
Customer Requirements

Measures
Design & Development

Customer Satisfaction
Overview of the Key
C 2.2 Change Management Measures

Overview of Corrective
• Department Manager
CP 3 Supply Chain Actions

C 3.1 C 3.2 C 3.3 C 3.4

Purchasing Receiving Warehousing Delivery Revision History

CP 4 Manufacturing
Manuals
C 3.1 Management of
C 3.1 Production Realization
Production Orders

CP 5 Management of Customer Satisfaction

HR Department

TH Department

PR Department

TH Department
QA Department

QA Department

QA Department

QA Department

QA Department
Administration

Administration

Administration

Administration
Adminstration

Facility Dpt
Production
Production

Production
Production
Production

Production

Production

Production
Business

Business

Business

Business

Business

Business
Business

Business

Business

Business
General

General

General
Support Processes (SP) EMF Department

SP 1 SP 2 SP 3
Laboratory & Metrology Maintenance Plant & IT Infrastructure

PPUP Specialist
System Quality

Quality System

System Quality
0

Administrator/
HR Manager

Administrator

Administrator
Administrator

TH Manager

PR Manager

TH Manager
Assurance
Manager

Manager

Manager
Manager

Quality

Facility
EMF Process Owner

SP 4 SP 5
Finacial Controlling Continuous Improvement Process
MP01 MP02 MP03 CP01 CP02 CP03 CP04 CP05 SP01 SP02 SP03 SP04 SP05 IAT F ISO

Modified Standard 331 Nr. Title Description Strategical Management Quality

Process Customer Laboratory & Maintenance of Facility & IT Financial Continuous
Business of Human Management Marketing & Sales
Development
Supply Chain Manufacturing
Satisfaction Metrology Equipment Management Controlling Improvement zf zo
Planning Resources System

Added 9001 0 4.0 Title 4.0 Context of the Organization 0 0

4.0 Context of the 9001 1
Organization 4.1 New 4.1 Understanding the organization and its context zon 0 0
9001 1 4.2 New 4.2 Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties zon 0 0

IATF 16949 Requirements 9001

16949
16949
4
4
4
4.3
4.3.1
4.3.2
4.3 Determining the scope of the quality management system
4.3.1 Determining the scope of the quality management system - supplemental
4.3.2 Customer-specific requirements
zo
zf
zf
zo
zf
zf
zo
zf
zf
zo
zf
zf
0
4
4
4
0
0
9001 / 16949 13 4.4 Title 4.4 Quality management system and its processes zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo 0 13
9001 13 4.4.1 4.4.1 Quality management system and its processes zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo 0 13
16949 13 4.4.1.1 New 4.4.1.1 Conformance of products and processes zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon 0 0
16949 13 4.4.1.2 New 4.4.1.2 Product safety zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon zon 0 0
9001 13 4.4.2 4.4.2 Quality management system and its processes zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo zo 0 13
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
1. GAP Analysis Methodology • Overview of All IATF 16949: 2016 Requirements

All IATF 16949 Requirements were allocated to Specific

Business Process of EMF
• Transfer of IATF 16949 requirements to a specific EMF
Business Process
• Allocate clear responsibility to improve actual QMS based
on the new requirements (to a specific Department
Manager)
• Remarks
• Overview of all Requirements helps to have:
• Clear visibility over new vs old requirements
of the standards
• Clear visibility over ISO 9001 vs IATF 16949
requirements
• Overview of all Requirements helps to estimate
amount of work to improve EMF internal processes
based on the new requirements

ISO 9001 Requirements;

IATF 16949 Requirements
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
1. GAP Analysis Methodology • Perform GAP Analysis

All IATF 16949 Requirements were analyzed in a specific workshop with multifunctional teams (PRD/ENG/LOG/QS/QLT and TOP Management)
• Detailed Standard Analysis
• Documented procedures and records needed
• Link to EMF Documented procedures
• Complexity of the Change (from 1-5)
• Level of the actual implementation
• Level of complexity to implement changes
• Actions to Cover the Gap
• Improvement directions
• Responsibility and Due Dates/ Status / Details IATF 16949: 2016 GAP Analysis
Y
e 1 = Fully implemented 1 = Not diffi cult 1 = Not complex
s
N
2 = Minor changes needed 2 OPEN
o
P
a 3 = Update Needed 3 ONGOING
rP
a4 = Major changes needed 4 CLOSED
r
5 = Nothing in place 5 = Very diffi cult 25 = Very complex EFFICIENT

I
Level of current Level of difficulty to Level of complexity to
Requirement s Justification Justification Action Required Responsible Deadline STATUS Resources Required
implementation implement implement
t

4.0 Context of the Organization 0

4.3.2 Customer-specific requirements workshop de analiza a CSR (focus QAA Sumida) Lungu Elena 28.02.2018 1. alocarea de echipe multidisciplinare pentru
workshop
5 aspectele interne si externe nu au fost analizate pana acum 4 necesita analiza detaliata a Manualului Calitatii si a Cerintelor Clientilor 20 ONGOING
2. Suport extern pentru abordare standard in
cadrul workshopului
4.4.2 Quality management system and its processes verificarea in timpoul workshop-urilor a existentei cerintelor de la Lungu Elena 28.02.2018 NA
2 sistemul actual prevede proceduri si inregistrari 2 sistemul actual prevede proceduri si inregistrari 4 ONGOING
4.4.2
5.1.1.2 Process effectiveness and efficiency cerinta standardului ISO/TS si EMF QMS etra de focus pe eficacitatea de realizat in timpul worksho-urilor de analiza pe procese (verificarea Lungu Elena 28.02.2018 1. focus in analizaTurttle pe fiecare proces in
3 cerinta noua de implementat in special din punct de vedere al efi cientei 3 9 ONGOING
proceselor si mai putin pe eficienta indicatorilor de efi cienta pe procese) parte
5.2.2 Communicating the quality policy comunicarea noii Politici in Domeniul Calitatii catre Organizatie Lungu Elena 28.02.2018 metoda standard de comunicare: in cadrul
3 adapatrea Politicii Calitatii la cerintele IATF 4 necesita analiza detaliata a Politicii Calitatii 12 ONGOING
training-ului inductiv
6.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities workshop de analiza a tuturor proceselor QMS Lungu Elena 28.02.2018 1. alocarea echipei multidisciplinare pentru
workshop
5 riscurile si oportunitatile nu au fost analizate pana acum 4 necesita analiza detaliata a tuturor proceselor QMS 20 ONGOING
2. Suport extern pentru abordare standard in
cadrul workshopului
7.3 Awareness workshop de analiza procesului de Management HR Lungu Elena 28.02.2018 1. alocarea echipei multidisciplinare pentru
necesita analiza detaliata in cadrul procesului de Management HR (Turttle
- verificarea noilor cerinte impuse de IATF (special focus pe impactul workshop
3 adapatrea sistemului existent la cerintele IATF 3 Diagram) 9 ONGOING
tehnologiei asupra performantei) 2. Suport extern pentru abordare standard in
- includerea noilor cerinte in Turtle Diagram
cadrul workshopului
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
2. GAP Analysis Status • Highlights from GAP Analysis

2.1 QMS Changes EMF Process Description Revision

Index:
1
Revision
Date:
28/10/2017

Site EMF Balti Year 2017

A major change in the QMS Structure Management Processes (MP)
MP 2 MP 3

• New QMS Business Model

MP 1
Strategic Business Human Resource Quality Management
Planning Management System

Links:
CP 1 Marketing & Sales Process Evaluation "Site
Specific"

Respect of Relevenat Requirements

Interseted Parties Requirements
CP 2 Process Development (PDP)
Management Evaluation /
CP 2.1 Process

Customer Requirements
Measures
Design & Development

Customer Satisfaction
Overview of the Key
C 2.2 Change Management Measures

Overview of Corrective
CP 3 Supply Chain Actions

C 3.1 C 3.2 C 3.3 C 3.4 Business Evaluation Process

Purchas ing Receiving Warehousing Delivery Revision History
Key Business Process Evaluation and Improvement
CP 4 Manufacturing Business Key Process Risk M atrix
Manuals
C 3.1 Management of
C 3.1 Production Realization
Production Orders
Probability/Controlability
CP 5 Management of Customer Satisfaction

Very High Level / Very Unstable (5)

Medium Level / Fairly Confident (3)
Very Low Level/Very Confident (1)

Medium Level / Unconfortable (4)

High Level / Unconfortable (5)

Low Level/Very Confident (2)
Support Processes (SP)
SP 1 SP 2 SP 3
Laboratory & Metrology Maintenance Plant & IT Infrastructure
0
SP 4 SP 5
Finacial Controlling Continuous Improvement Process

Rating 1 2 3 4 5
Critical to Safety&Environmental (5)
Critical Impact to Business 5 5 10 15 20 25
Critical to Quality (5)

Business Impact
Major Impact on Customer Satisfaction (4) 4 4 8 12 16 20
Major Impact to Business
Major Impact on Internal Performance (3) 3 3 6 9 12 15

• Major Change in EMF Level 1 Documents Minor Impact to Business

Minor Impact on Customer Satisfaction (2)

Minor Impact on Internal Performance (1)

2

1
2

1
4

2
6

3
8

4
10

• New Quality Policy

• New Quality Manual
Stakeholder-Analysis acc. Internal Procedure xx.yyy F-xx-yyy

Plant: Creator / Amender: Revision date / FY:

• New Procedure needed Influence on SC XYZ SRL Plant (Business Impact)---->

Stakeholder Context Needs and Expectations

Evaluation Evaluation
Score
Impacts for SC XYZ SRLPlant (Risks and Opportunities)--->

Risks Opportunities Occurrence/Stability Score

Risk Risk
Compliance obligations Relevant process(es)

• Stake Holders Analysis

(level 1) (level 2) Score Analysis
1. Certified Management System (IATF16949,
ISO14001), 1. Infringement of contracts / 1. ensure (re-)certification of systems,
1. new orders Code 1 - Sales and Marketing
2. Observance of contracts and customer penalties, fulfil contractual obligations (check
Critical Impact Critical to 2. new business areas Code 2 - Quality

• Risk Assessment and Actions to address risks

Customer Economic requirements/customer specific requirements 5 2. no new orders, Medium Level / Unconfortable (4) 4 20 High contracts regularly)
to Business Quality (5) 3. help/support in emergency Code 3 - Safety and Environment
(CSR) 3. revocation of certificates 2. Fulfilment of the Expected Orders at
situations
3. Deliver Expected Quantity at Defined 4. Late payments Righ Quality
Quality
1. efficient usage of professional Code 4 - Purchasing
1. Observance of contracts / legal Major Impact 1. stop of production 1. ensure fulfilment of contracts (review
competences Code 5 - Customer Service
requirements Major Impact on Customer 2. no delivery to customer in time contracts and if necesary update them),
Supplier / Subcontractor Economic 4 2. optimal pricing Medium Level / Fairly Confident (3) 3 12 High Code 2 - Quality
2. Observance of payment obligations to Business Satisfaction 3. customer complaints 2. communicate Company´s
3. help/support in emergency Code 3 - Safety and Environment
3. Tendency for Price Increase (4) 4. negative impact on P&L Results requirement to suppliers
situations Code 10- Finance & Controlling
1. stop of production
1. continous supervision of regulatory
Major Impact 2. closing of the company 1. good collaboration Code 1 - Sales and Marketing
requirements, regulatory approvals and
1. Compliance with legal and regulatory Major Impact on Internal 3. penalties/fines 2. fast possibility to receive Code 6 - Management Process
Regulatory Institutions Legal 3 Medium Level / Fairly Confident (3) 3 9 Medium expiration dates
requirements to Business Performance 4. restrictions approvals or decisions (e.g. Waste Code 2 - Quality
2. fast reaction to changes in the
(3) 5. lawsuits approval, Building-authorization) Code 3 - Safety and Environment
legislation (ex: Customs)
6. bad reputation
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
2. GAP Analysis Status • Highlights from GAP Analysis

2.2 Documentation Requirements (1/2)

Required Procedure Responsible Due Date Status Analysis
1 PS-34 PRODUCT SAFETY (Product Safety (4.4.1.2)) STEFCIUC VITALIA 20.02.2018 GREEN New procedure required by IATF 16949 Standard
2 PS-31 ASIGURAREA METROLOGICA (Calibration/verification STEFCIUC VITALIA 09.01.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
records (7.1.5.2.1)

3 PS-07 TRAINIGN DE PERSONAL INTERN (Competence (7.2.1) STEFCIUC VITALIA 27.12.2017 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
4 PS-03 PLANIFICAREA SI EFECTUAREA AUDITURILOR (Internal STEFCIUC VITALIA 17.01.2018 GREEN Major changes in terms of Competence and Experience
auditor competency (7.2.3)
5 PS-15 MOTIVAREA SI IMPUTERNICIREA ANGAJATILOR NOVACOV ANDREI 20.11.2017 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
(Employee motivation and empowerment (7.3.2)
6 PS-22 MODIFICAREA SI DIFUZAREA DESENELOR STEFCIUC VITALIA 17.11.2017 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
TEHNICE,SPECIFICATII INGINERESTI (Engineering specifications
(7.5.3.2.2)

7 Design and development of products and services (8.3.1.1) NA NA NA Design in done by Customer
8 Supplier selection process (8.4.1.2) NA NA NA Direct Materials are supplied by SUMIDA
- clarification on service providers with impact on EMF
performance (ex: maintenance, infrastructure, training
providers, etc)

9 PS-19 TIPURI DE CONTROALE (Type and extent of control STEFCIUC VITALIA 20.11.2017 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
(8.4.2.1)
10 PS-02 CERINTE LEGALE SI DE REGLEMENTARE (Statutory and NOVACOV ANDREI 11.01.2018 GREEN
regulatory requirements (8.4.2.2)
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
2. GAP Analysis Status • Highlights from GAP Analysis

2.2 Documentation Requirements (2/2)

Required Procedure Responsible Due Date Status Analysis

11 PS-25 APROVIZIONARE (Supplier monitoring (8.4.2.4) NOVACOV ANDREI 21.11.2017 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements

12 Change control (8.5.6.1) GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
13 PS-20 TRANFERUL DE PRODUCTIE (Temporary change of STEFCIUC VITALIA 15.01.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
process controls (8.5.6.1.1) - Special l attention to the approval of the temporary
changes

14 PS-12 Verificare 100%, sortare si reprelucrare pieselor STEFCIUC VITALIA 12.01.2018 GREEN New procedure required by IATF 16949 Standard
neconforme (Control of reworked product (8.7.1.4) - Special attention to the risk analysis
15 Control of repaired product (8.7.1.5) GREEN New procedure required by IATF 16949 Standard
- Special attention to the risk analysis
16 PS-11 NECONFORMITATI, RISCURI SI ACTIUNI CORECTIVE STEFCIUC VITALIA 26.12.2017 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
(Nonconforming product disposition (8.7.1.7)
17 PS-03 PLANIFICAREA SI VALIDAREA AUDITURILLOR (Internal STEFCIUC VITALIA 17.01.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
audit program (9.2.2.1)
18 PS-27 8D (Problem solving (10.2.3) STEFCIUC VITALIA 09.01.2018 GREEN New procedure required by IATF 16949 Standard
- 8D methodology as main tool for Problem Solving
19 PS-17 MANAGEMENTUL DISPOZITIVELOR ANTIEROARE (Error- STEFCIUC VITALIA 15.01.2018 GREEN New procedure required by IATF 16949 Standard
proofing (10.2.4)

20 PS-14 CIP Continual improvement (10.3.1) STEFCIUC VITALIA 17.11.2017 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
2. GAP Analysis Status • Highlights from GAP Analysis

2.3 Internal Processes (1/2)

Required Process Responsible Due Date Status Analysis

1 Product safety – definition of escalation process (4.4.1.2) STEFCIUC VITALIA 01.02.2018 GREEN New Requirement from IATF Standard
2 Preventive actions -  lessons learned from the impact of PROCESS 01.02.2018 GREEN New Requirement from IATF Standard
negative effects of risk (6.1.2.2) OWNERS - Focus on Risk Assessment during the Workshops and
actions to address risks

3 Contingency plans -notification process to the customer and PRISACARI DAN 01.02.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
other interested parties for the extent and duration of any - Special focus on new requirements defined in the IATF
situation impacting customer operations (6.1.2.3) 16949 standard (cyber attack, etc)

4 Development of products with embedded software -  quality assurance for NA NA NA No integrated software into our product (only hard
their products with internally developed embedded software (8.3.2.3) product)
5 Product design input - deploy information gained from previous design NA NA NA Design in done by Customer
projects, competitive product analysis (benchmarking), supplier feedback,
internal input, field data, and other relevant sources for current and future
projects of a similar nature (8.3.3.1)

6 Special characteristics - identify special characteristics, STEFCIUC VITALIA 01.02.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
including those determined by the customer and the risk - Special focus on identification of special characteristics
analysis performed by the organization (8.3.3.3) and link to Core Tools (FMEA, APQP and CP, etc)
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
2. GAP Analysis Status • Highlights from GAP Analysis

2.3 Internal Processes (2/2)

Required Process Responsible Due Date Status Analysis

7 Product approval process - establish, implement, and maintain MACOVEI 01.02.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
a product and manufacturing approval process conforming to BOGDAN - No special focus on external provided products because
requirements defined by the customer(s) (8.3.4.4) EMF is not outsourcing any of activities

8  Second-party audits - second-party audit process in their NA NA NA Is done by customer

supplier management approach (8.4.2.4.1)

9 Feedback of information from service  - communication of information on NA NA NA Field Failure Analysis and Warranty Management System
service concerns to manufacturing, material handling, logistics, done by Customer
engineering, and design activities (8.5.5.1)

10 Verification and acceptance of conformity of externally STEFCIUC VITALIA 01.02.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
provided products and services  - ensure the quality of - No special focus on external provided products because
externally provided processes, products, and services (8.6.4) EMF is not outsourcing any of activities

11 Monitoring and measurement of manufacturing processes - STEFCIUC VITALIA 01.02.2018 GREEN Adapt actual procedure to the IATF 16949 requirements
escalation process when acceptance criteria are not met GASNAS IURIE - No special focus on external provided products because
(9.1.1.1) EMF is not outsourcing any of activities

12 Warranty management systems  - implement a warranty management NA NA NA Field Failure Analysis and Warranty Management System
process (10.2.5) done by Customer
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
2. GAP Analysis Status • Highlights from GAP Analysis

2.4 Organizational Changes

Introduction of the Process Owners
• Role & Responsibility as per IATF 16949: 2016 standard
• Main responsible to define, implement, maintain and improve QMS processes
• During the workshops to the IATF 16949 Transition Program Process Owners will be trained to increase their competence on IATF 16949 Standard
• Theoretical Training
• Practical Training
• Process Analysis based on Turttle Diagram,
• GAP Analysis based on the GAP Analysis Tool,
• Risk Analysis based on the Standard Risk Analysis Tool

QMR and his Role & Responsibility

• We decided to keep the QMR with the following roles and responsibilities
• Overall management of the QMS
• Support in Transition Program
• Support to Process Owners to adapt their processes to the new IATF 16949 Requirements
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
2. GAP Analysis Status • Highlights from GAP Analysis

2.5 Impact on Management Practices

New Structure for the Management Review
• Requirements as per IATF 16949: 2016 Standard

Additional Management Review to complete with IATF 16949 Requirements after implementation of major changes
• After implementing major changes and performing a complete Audit Cycle, major review of the QNS System
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
3. Transition Program • EMF Transitions Program from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 Standard

3.1 Overview of the Transition Program

Complete Transition Program
• Process Owners to start leading improvement of their processes
• Dedicated teams for each workshop (multidisciplinary approach)

Responsibility to Coordinate Transition Program

• QMR and QA Manager
• Direct Support from TOP Management

Due Date
• End of Feb 2018/start of March to complete all tasks
 EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016
3. Transition Program • EMF Transitions Program from ISO/TS 16949 to IATF 16949 Standard

3.2 Resource Needed for the Transition Program

Workshops Independent Work/Activities
• 1-2 Initial Workshops to define Transition Program • Activities in the departments to complete tasks from Workshops
• QMS House/Quality Policy, etc • Based on how critical is the process change and how big is the GAP
• Risk Assessment Methodology Analysis
• Time: each workshop min 4 hours • Time:
• 13 Standard Workshops to analyze all Internal Processes • Estimation is min 40-50 hours per process
• 2-3 Workshops with External Support (External Consultant) • Additional 1 person working full time on Transition Program for
• Rest of the Workshops performed with internal resources 3-4 months
• Time: each workshop min 4 hours Program Reviews:
Training Sessions • Transition Program Weekly Reviews
• Awareness Training on IATF 16949: 2016 Requirements • Internal Reviews with Top Management and External Conf Calls with
• With Key Players in the Transition Program External Consultant
• Time: min 8 hours • Time: approx. 2 hours per week
• Core Tools Training to cover GAP for the Internal Auditors Competences • Management Review
• Min Internal Auditors • Additional Management Review at the end of Feb 2018 after
• Time: min 4 days x 8 hours implementation of major changes
• Theoretical Presentation in each workshop • Time: min 4 hours with complete Management Team
• Short description of the Risk Analysis, Process Analysis and Gap Internal Audits:
Analysis • 1 additional System Audit
• Time: approx. 1 hour at the beginning of each Workshop • After implementation of major changes to check effectiveness
• Time: min 3x8 hours audit time
EMF-GAP Analysis on IATF 16949: 2016