Theories of Sentencing Criminal Process
Theories of Sentencing Criminal Process
Theories of Sentencing Criminal Process
Criminal Process
Criminal Justice Act 2003
S 142
• The offender has obviously broken the criminal law and must
be punished
• The criminal law takes revenge against the offender on behalf
of both the victim and society
• This is known as retribution
• The main issue is that the punishment must be proportionate
to the crime – the ‘just deserts’ theory.
Punishment of Offenders
• Tariff Sentences
• For many sentences, the tariffs are fixed in order to provide consistent
sentencing.
• In America some states have fixed tariffs for each crime. This doesn’t
allow the judge to have any discretion and may lead to injustice as the
judge cannot consider mitigating factors or circumstances of the
individual offender.
• Fines are a particular area of concern. A £1 000 fine to someone on a
very low income is extremely punitive but to a high earner it may have
very little, if any, effect.
The Reduction of Crime (Including its
Reduction by Deterrence)
• It allows for the victim to come face to face with the offender
and explain the effect of their offence, whilst also having a say
in what the offender will do to put things right.
Reparation