Crim Law 1 C
Crim Law 1 C
Crim Law 1 C
ONE)
CRIMINAL LAW, DEFINED
Criminal Law- that branch of public law
which defines crimes treats of their nature
and provides for their punishment.
DISTINCTIONS
FELONY – OFFENSE – INFRACTIONS
punishable by punishable by – punishable by
the Revised special penal city or municipal
Penal Code laws ordinances
CRIME, DEFINED
An act committed or omitted in violation of
a public law forbidding or commanding it.
DELICT and QUASI DELICT
• Delict – a misdeamenor, an offense, or
simply CRIME.
• Quasi delict – the fault or negligence of a
person causing damge to another, and
there is no pre existing contractual relation
between the parties (Article 2176 Civil
Code). Also known as CULPA
AQUILIANA.
SOURCES OF CRIMINAL LAW
1. Act 3815 known as the Revised Penal
Code
2. Special Penal Laws passed by Congress
3. Presidential Decrees issued by President
Marcos
4. Codigo Penal De Espana (Spanish Penal
Code)
COMMON LAW CRIMES
• the body of principles, usages and rules of
actions which do not result from the
express act of the legislature. There is no
such crime in the Philippines.
NULLUM CRIMEN NULLA
POENA SINE LEGE
• there is no crime if there is no law
punishing it.
CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMINAL LAW
• An act or omission
• Act or omission punishable by the RPC
• Act is performed or omission is incurred by
means of dolo or culpa.
• Act- is any bodily movement tending to
produce some effects in the external
world.
• Omission- inaction, the failure to perform
an act one is bound to do.
IMPRUDENCE VS. NEGLIGENCE
• Freedom of action
• Intelligence
• Intent
MEN’S REA
• Criminal Intent
• The gravamen of a certain crime
REQUISITES OF FAULT OR CULPA
(CULPABLE FELONIES)
• Freedom of action
• Intelligence
• Imprudent, negligent, or lack of foresight
or lack of skill
MISTAKE OF FACT
Mistake of fact- is a misapprehension of
fact on the part of the person who caused
injury to another. He is not liable for
absence of criminal intent
REQUISITES OF MISTAKE OF
FACT
.
SUBJECTIVE PHASE vs. OBJECTIVE PHASE OF THE
CRIME
1. Justifying Circumstances
2. Exempting Circumstances
3. Mitigating Circumstances
4. Aggravating Circumstances
5. Alternative Circumstances
JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES,
DEFINED
Those where the act of a person is said to
be in accordance with the law, so that he
in the eyes of the law is considered not to
have violated the law and is therefore free
from criminal and civil liabilities.
QUICK ENUMERATION OF
JUSTIFYING CIRCUMSTANCES
1. Self defense
2. Defense of relatives
3. Defense of strangers
4. Avoidance of greater evil
5. Fulfillment of duty
6. Obedience to order of superior.
7. Battered Woman Syndrome
THREE REQUISITES OF SELF
DEFENSE
1. Unlawful aggression.
2. Reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel it.
3. Lack of sufficient provocation on the part
of the person defending himself.
2. Any one who acts in defense of DEFENSE OF RELATIVES
the person or rights of his spouse,
ascendants, descendants, or
legitimate, natural or adopted
brothers or sisters, or his relatives
by affinity in the same degrees
and those consanguinity within the
fourth civil degree, provided that
the first and second requisites
prescribed in the next preceding
circumstance are present, and the
further requisite, in case the
revocation was given by the
person attacked, that the one
making defense had no part
therein.
REQUISITES OF DEFENSE OF
RELATIVES
1. Unlawful aggression.
2. Reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel it.
3. In case the Provocation was given by the
person attacked, that the one making
defense had no part therein.
Anyone who acts in defense DEFENSE OF
of the person or rights of a STRANGERS
stranger, provided that the
first and second requisites
mentioned in the first
circumstance of this article
are present and that the
person defending be not
induced by revenge,
resentment, or other evil
motive.
REQUISITES OF DEFENSE OF
STRANGERS
1. Unlawful aggression.
2. Reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel it.
3. The person defending be not induced by
revenge, resentment, or other evil motive.
Any person who, in order to avoid AVOIDANCE OF
an evil or injury, does not act
which causes damage to another, GREATER EVIL/STATE OF
provided that the following NECESSITY
requisites are present:
An ancient common law rule in A rule which states that where the
homicide which made it the duty of a accused is where he has the right
person assailed to retreat as far as he to be, the law does not require him
can before he is justified in meeting
to retreat when his assailant is
force with force advancing upon him with a deadly
weapon.
1. Unlawful aggression
2. Reasonable necessity of the means
employed to prevent or repel it
3. In case the provocation was given by the
person attacked, the one making the
defense had no part therein.
RELATIVES BY AFFINITY vs.
RELATIVES BY CONSANGUINITY
• Relatives by affinity are those created by
marriage such as parents in law, sons and
daughters in law
• Relatives by consanguinity are relatives by
nature or by blood relations. Siblings are
within the 2nd civil degree, whereas uncle
and niece or aunt and nephew are within
the 3rd civil degree, first cousins are within
the 4th civil degree
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN SELF DEFENSE,
DEFENSE OF RELATIVES AND DEFENSE OF
STRANGERS
SELF DEFENSE DEFENSE OF DEFENSE OF
RELATIVES STRANGERS
ANSWER:
a. Tension Building Stage- where minor battering
occurs
b. Acute Battering Incident- characterized by
brutality, destructiveness and death.
c. Tranquil or loving phase- The batterer shows
loving caring nurture to the victim.
d. All of the above
EXEMPTING CIRCUMSTANCES
1. Ways and means are resorted to for the Here, the police practically induces the
purpose of trapping and capturing the accused into the commission of the offense
lawbreaker in the execution of his plans and he himself becomes a co principal in
the crime.
2. The intent to violate the law originated 2. The intent to violate the law did not
from the accused himself. originate from the accused as he was
induced only by the police to perform a
criminal act.
3. Not an absolutory cause hence does not An absolutory cause that exempts one from
exempt from criminal liability criminal liability
MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES
one who at the time He is an offender who Within ten yeARS A PERSON
of his trial for one HAS BEEEN
PREVIOUSLY
THE ACUSED IS AFTER HAVING
crime, shall have CONVICTED OF BEEN
PUNISHED FOR:
been previously
ROBO, HURTO, CONVICTED
convicted by final
judgment of another An offense to which the ESTAFA, SHALL COMMIT
law attaches an equal FALSIFICATION, ANOTHER
crime embraced in or greater penalty or
the same title of the PHYSICAL FELONY WHILE
For two or more crimes
Revised Penal to which it attaches a INJURY FOR SERVING HIS
Code. lighter penalty THE THIRD
SENTENCE
TIME.
EVIDENT PREMEDITATION
EVIDENT PREMEDITATION- it involves a
determination to commit the crime prior to
the moment of its execution and also to
carry out the criminal intent which must be
the result of deliberate, calculated and
reflective thoughts through a period of time
sufficient to dispassionately consider and
accept the consequences thereof, thus
indicating greater perversity
Q: What are the requisites of evident
premeditation?
A: 1. The time when the offender determined to
commit the crime;
2. An act manifestly indicating that the culprit
has clung to his determination;
3. A sufficient lapse of time between the
determination and execution, to allow him to
reflect upon the consequences of his act and to
allow his conscience to overcome the resolution
of his will.
CRAFT, DEFINED
CRAFT- is a circumstance characterized
by trickery or cunning resorted to by the
accused, to carry out his design. It is the
use of intellectual trickery and cunning on
the part of the accused.
“ASTUCIA”
FRAUD, DEFINED
FRAUD- insidious words or machinations
used to induce the victim to act in a
manner which would enable the offender
to carry out his design.
“FRAUDE”
DISGUISE, DEFINED
• DISGUISE- it involves the deliberate effort
of the accused to conceal his identity in
the commission of the crime.
“DISFRAZ”
TREACHERY OR ALEVOSIA
There is treachery when the offender
commits any of the crimes against the
person, employing means, methods or
forms in the execution thereof which tend
directly and specially to insure its
execution, without risk to himself arising
from the defense which the offended party
might make.
IGNOMINY, DEFINED
• IGNOMINY- is a circumstance pertaining
to the moral order, which adds disgrace
and obloquy to the material injury caused
by the crime. It is a circumstance that
tends to make the effects of the crime
more humiliating, thus adding to the
victim’s moral sufferings.
UNLAWFUL ENTRY, DEFINED
UNLAWFUL ENTRY- there is unlawful
entry when an entrance is affected by a
way not intended for the purpose.
“ESCALAMIENTO”
CRUELTY, DEFINED
CRUELTY- a circumstance whereby the
offender enjoys and delights in making his
victim suffer slowly and gradually, causing
him unnecessary physical pain in the
consummation of his criminal act.
“ENSANAMIENTO”
FOUR KINDS OF AGGRAVATING
CIRCUMSTANCE
2.May be given before or after conviction or Given only after conviction by final
during trial. judgment
3. Usually given to political offnders and a 3. Usually given to common crimes and
group of people single person
Libel 1 year