Henkel: Building A Winning Culture: Group 09
Henkel: Building A Winning Culture: Group 09
Henkel: Building A Winning Culture: Group 09
Group 09
About Henkel and the need for change…..
• German Family
• Competitors : 3M,P&G,Unilever and L'Oréal
• Need for change:
• “ The happy underperformer: always #2 or #3”
• 58% drop in net profit in 2008
Adhesive Technologies (48%) Laundry and Home Care The Cosmetics/Toiletries (22%)
(30%)
Sealants and surface treatments Personal care products such as
to industrial customers in Detergents and related home shampoos, hair coloring, skin
various industries care products creams, deodorants, and toothpastes
Brands: Loctite and Pritt glue Brands: Dial soap, and Persil Brand :Schwarzkopf hair care
sticks laundry detergent products
First one invented glue sticks
As the leader of this business
2
Problem Analysis
• Henkel lacked competitive spirit with a slow growth rate of 8%
• Faced immense competition in laundry and personal care market
• Global financial crisis and economic slowdown impacted business
• Shifted focus to basic products, cutting down costs, increasing prices
• Necessity to transform complacent nature of employees
• The overall performance of company declined though the individual performance
remained high
• Hence necessity of overhauling performance management system
• Focus towards entrepreneurship and accountability required
3
Conceptualization of Change process
4
Vision for Change
Vision A global leader in brands and technologies
5
Henkel - Transition state of change
6
Cheerleading-Incentive plan
● Group Performance
○ Measured on basis of predefined KPIs
○ Rated on scale of 200
● Team Performance
○ Based on KPIs designed with respect to business unit or local targets
○ Weightage- 30% on company scores + 70% on performance scores
○ Rated on scale of 200
● Individual Performance
○ Based on KPIs(50%) + Rating based on DRT Process(50%)
7
Stretch Goals
• Required to transform the complacent culture towards a winning culture
• Objective probability of attainment unknown but is seemingly impossible given current capabilities
• Means of creating performance pressure to employees
• Necessary to achieve full business potential and focus on customers and strengthen the team
• Allows employees to understand negative consequences to company prestige
• Recognize the employee efforts and implement strategies to achieve better goals
• Bonuses linked to overall company performance pushed the employees to strive to improve performance
8
Forced Distribution method
• Assigns employees to certain category based on their performance
• Managers rank employees into 4 categories:
• Top 10%
• Strong 60%
• Moderate 10%
• Below par 5%
Merits Demerits
• Increases productivity • Quotas can pull down par performers
• Increases competition and performance • Limits creativity and risk taking
• Easy to target people for L&D and appraisals • Impact on corporate culture
• Acts a rationale for benefits and layoffs • Demoralize employees
• Unhealthy competition
9
Ways to improve the Change process
• Incentive system to everyone : Raising the bonus for topper levels to encourage employees to
raise their performance
• Identify and manage best practices and communicate to everyone with manuals
10
Thankyou
11