Chapter 4 More On Modes of Entry
Chapter 4 More On Modes of Entry
Chapter 4 More On Modes of Entry
3. Modes of entry
1. International Business
3.1.Exporting,
Analysis
3.2. Licensing
Timing of Entry – Early 3.3. Franchising
entry vs. late entry 3.4. Contract manufacturing,
3.5. Turnkey projects,
2 - Factors affecting
3.6. FDI
operating modes
3.7. Mergers and acquisitions
- Internal 3.8. joint ventures
4 - Comparisons of different entry modes
- External
Foreign Market Entry Modes
– Timing of Entry
– The moment when the initial decision is taken by the firm whether to
internationalize or not
Of two ways:
– Early entrant
– Late entrant
Advantages and Disadvantages of Early
Entry
– Advantages of being Early Entrant
– A competitive edge gained by being the first to introduce a product or service
in new market
– The opportunity to grab the best market place
– Technology leadership
– Chance to build brand loyalty
– Scope to create barriers to entry
– Enhance reputation
– Scope for creating a lead which others have to follow
– Disadvantages:
– The cost of pioneering can be high- techy, R & D, establishing distribution
channel, marketing know-how
– Weak loyalty of first time users
– Rapid technological change; skills & know-how easily imitated
Advantages of late Entry
– Advantages of Being Late Entrant
– Having lower R & D and marketing costs;
– ability to learn from the mistakes of the early entrant;
– ability to polish the design & capture large market share;
– lower risks
Modes of Entry – meaning
– A mode of entry - the channel employed to gain entry
into a new international markets
– there are many and diverse alternatives
– The decision of how to enter a foreign market can
have a significant impact on the results.
Mode of Entry – two broad
approaches
– Broadly speaking, there are 2 broad
approaches :
1 - Ownership forms. and
2 - Non-ownership forms
Non-ownership forms
– Non-ownership forms- involve doing IB without
ownership interest in the foreign countries concerned.
– These are: merchandise export, import & counter trade,
service export and import, licensing and franchising,
contract manufacturing, management contracts and
turnkey contracts.
Non-ownership forms
1 - internalization theory,
2 - appropriability theory and
3 - freedom to pursue global objectives
Internalization theory
– Control through self-handling of operations is known as internalization.
– Self-handling may reduce costs for a number of reasons:
– Different operating units within the same company are likely to share a
common corporate culture, which expedites communications- a lack of
trust, common terminology, & knowledge are major obstacles to
successful collaboration
– The company can use its own managers, who understand and are
committed to carrying out its objectives.
– The company can avoid protracted negotiations with another company on
such matters as how each will be compensated for contributions
Appropriability Theory
– Appropriability theory is the idea that companies want to deny rivals and
potential rivals’ access to resources such as capital, patents, trademarks, and
management know-how that might be captured through collaborative
agreements.
– Appropriability theory- the idea of denying rivals access to resources
– Companies are reluctant to transfer vital resources- capital, patents,
trademarks, and management know how- to another organization for fear of
their competitive position being undermined
– Companies are less concerned about appropriability in countries they
perceive as having a strong rule of law
Freedom to pursue Global Strategy
– A company that has a wholly owned foreign operations
may find it easier to allow the operation to participate
in a global strategy
– Pursuit of Global Strategies. When a company has a
wholly owned foreign operation, it may more easily
have that operation participate in a global or
transnational strategy.
Foreign Direct Investment (mostly
partial, when it is wholly…the FDI
becomes Wholly owned subsidiary)
– Is the direct ownership of facilities in the target country. It involves the
transfer of resources including capital, technology, and personnel. It may be
made through the acquisition of an existing entity or the establishment of a
new enterprise
– Involves substantial ownership & control, entrepreneurial risks, technology
and management transfer and hosts of implications for the host country and
the firm concerned
– Takes the form of starting a subsidiary, acquiring a stake in an existing firm
or starting a joint venture in the foreign market.
– Direct investment and management of the firms concerned normally go
hand in hand
Wholly owned manufacturing
facilities
– Companies with long term & substantial interest in the foreign
market normally establish fully owned manufacturing faculties
there
– It is simply not possible to maintain substantial market
standing in an important area unless one has a physical
presence of a producer- Drucker
– A number of factors like trade barriers, differences in the
production and other costs, government policies, etc
encourage the establishment of production facilities in the
foreign markets
Wholly owned subsidiary
Advantages Disadvantages
– Less time consuming and quick – Acquiring a firm in a foreign country
to execute is a complex task involving bankers,
lawyers, regulation, mergers and
– Less risky as compared to green acquisition specialists from the two
field countries
– Immediate grab of market share – Sometimes host countries imposed
restrictions on acquisition of local
– Reduce competition by taking companies by the foreign companies
over rival – Labor problem of the host country’s
– The investor can bank on the companies are also transferred to the
existing goodwill of the acquired acquired company
business
Green field investment
– Making Greenfield Investments-constructing new facilities
– Is the process of expanding operations in foreign market from ground zero
– Requires purchase of local property and local man power
– Reasons: difficult to find a company to buy, local governments may prevent
acquisition- competition & market dominance
– Companies may choose to build if:
– No desired company is available for acquisition
– Acquisition will lead to carryover problems
– Acquisition is harder to finance
Advantages and disadvantages of
Greenfield investment
Advantages Disadvantages
– No risk of losing technical – Lengthy process from scratch
– This is collabortion
Why Companies Collaborate
Alliance Types
– Differ based on their objectives and where they fit in a firm’s value chain
– Scale alliance- aim to provide efficiency by pooling similar assets so that
partners can carry out business activities in which they already have
experience
– Link alliances use complementary resources so that participating companies
can expand into new business areas
Types of Collaborative Arrangements
Advantages Disadvantages
– Access to expertise & contracts in local – Large investments of resources
markets – Partners may be locked into long-
– Reduced market & political risk term relations
– Shared knowledge & resources – Transfer pricing problems
– Economies of scale – The importance of venture to each
– Overcomes host government restrictions partner may change over time
– Cultural differences may result in
– May avoid local tariffs/non-tariffs barriers
management differences
– shared risk of failure
– Loss of flexibility & confidentiality
– Less costly than acquisitions
– Problems of management structures
– Better relations with national government & dual parenting
Key issues to consider in Joint
Venture
– The key issues to consider in a joint venture are ownership, control, length
of agreement, pricing, technology transfer, local firm capabilities and
resources, and government intentions
– Potential problems include:
– Conflict over asymmetric new investments
– Mistrust over proprietary knowledge
– Performance ambiguity- how to split the pie
– Lack of parent firm support
– Cultural clashes
– If, how, and when to terminate the relationship
Equity Alliances