Business overview-ABB & Caterpillar

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 8

Business overview- ABB & Caterpillar

5 business divisions-
Power products Divisions
Power systems
Automation products
Robotics
Process Automation Machin
ery

Financial
products

2004 - ABB - World leader in power


and automation technologies

Leading manufacturer of construction and


Operates in >100 $20.7 billion mining equipments, diesel and natural gas
countries worth engines and industrial gas turbines
Sales and Revenues of $36.6 billion in 2005
Relationship between ABB and caterpillar

US $40 Mn came from Caterpillar buys 30% of


selling turbochargers the turbochargers
alone produced

ABB is supplier to ABB supplied


Caterpillar's two plants components worth US
- Lafayette, Indiana & $67 Mn to Caterpillar
Kiel, Germany in 2004.
Issues outstanding
• Big disconnect between caterpillar & ABB Turbo systems customer wise
and management wise
Customer and • Caterpillar managers wanted supplier replacement due to ABB’s hostile
management behavior
disconnect

• No clarity on the roles and responsibilities of GAM of caterpillar


• Turbocharger BU management did not want GAM’s involvement in turbo
Roles &
Responsibilities charging working groups or the steering committee
of GAM

• Caterpillar was ABB’s top customer with 30% share in turbo systems by
30% by volume volume while making only 10% in revenue
& 10% by
revenue
Insights/points to consider
• About Caterpillar as a Key Account
– Purchases a significant volume of Turbochargers
– DMU- involves Jim Owens (CEO), Dan Murphy (VP- Global purchasing), Paul Wroblewski
(operations manager) and Tom Sandbord (Purchase manager)- It involves interaction
with different stakeholders.
– Expectations: More attention and robust/better delivery support, Better Relationship,
which can be long-lasting
• Straight Rebuy situation- on the verge of becoming a modified rebuy situation
• Interestingly, Paul who was getting hostile vibes from ABB, has now accepted to be in the
steering committee.
Current Status

May invest in you


position on loyalty ladder

Most Valuable
Partners
Customers
collaboration

Is willing to pay premiums

Resists competitors
Commodity underperformer
buyers s Endorses products

Wants to grow relationship

Sellers cost of serving Customer

ABB was always in the want to grow relationship part of the loyalty ladder. Caterpillar has 2 other suppliers other than
ABB and from the case we can see that, Caterpillar was ready to replace ABB immediately.

ABB Turbo charger sells 30% of the product for less than 10% revenue and this shows price cutting. The order quantity
provided by Kiel is less in volume and ABB also suffers from IP problems and turbo charger design by Caterpillar. So ABB is
not enjoying much revenue and is currently under performer.
ABB could have moved Caterpillar by collaborating with them on design and leveraging the product mix.
Account Selection Criteria

Capacity
Customer
Utilization Price & Margins Order Patterns
Maintenance Cost
(product Mix)

Turbo Chargers At present only 0.3% The order pattern


AC machine of ABB’s revenue is might lead to Customer
LV Control generated from reduction in price and Maintenance cost
Instrumentation Caterpillar, but on but ABB counteract it might be high, but
Robotics extending the profit by offering they can be
Opportunities to mix and by working specialised service. In decreased by
collaborate with Air for larger orders a the case of reorders.
system group on high profit margin is turbocharger the
design possible. committee might help

Caterpillar has high rate for growth


Already three suppliers present, if ABB does not approach for key supplier status then competitors might.
Both the companies value technological growth so there is strategic compatibility
Operational problems due to small order quantity can be solved by diversifying the product.
Key Account Management

 When Dan approached Oliver, his responses were not inviting. For successful key account
management program, senior manager’s support is necessary.
 The support might not be present as the program is being instituted for the first time. The
revenue from Caterpillar being less, the loss of BU’s control and the new CEO might also
be a factor.
 Dan should have met R&D managers, purchase managers and operation managers on both
side. Most importantly he should have met LEC executives and Tom Sandborg .
 The revenue for ABB Turbo charger BU from Caterpillar is less. ABB should do business
across the product line to achieve revenue. In such a scenario some BU will have to trade
on their profit margin. Therefore integration of sales programs with Key account program
is essential. This integration will reduce antagonism and encourage co-operation.
 Since many other BU’s are co-operating, ideally Dan should lead the steering committee
or at the least participate in it. The other BU heads involved in caterpillar should also be
informed of the decision.
 Apart from Dan one executive from turbo charger BU should sponsor the committee.
 Moreover the compatibility of strategy between ABB and Caterpillar should be checked
and depending upon it mission and the goals of the Key Account management program
and sales program should be set.
Recommendations

1. Less impact on short term but


in long run, big client like
caterpillar would be entirely
lost
2. ABB can
1. ABB can
approach 2. More flexibility could be
leave the
caterpillar provided which can help in
issue as it maintaining balance of power
with a new
was between the two partners.
offer
3. Proper division of
4. ABB responsibilities needs to be
3. Need for there i.e. who makes the final
should decision? Exact role of Key
ABB’s whole
provide account manager
turbocharger
better
unit to work
transparency 4. Transparency in terms of price
as a team and importance of caterpillar
to caterpillar
to ABB.

You might also like