Chapter 03. Operations Management and TQM
Chapter 03. Operations Management and TQM
Chapter 03. Operations Management and TQM
Management
Chapter 3 –
Project Management
Project Controlling
Project Management Techniques:
PERT And CPM
The Framework Of PERT And CPM
Network Diagrams And Approaches
Activity-on-Node Example
Activity-on-Arrow Example
Single unit
Many related activities
Difficult production planning and
inventory control
General purpose equipment
High labor skills
Research Project
Controlling
Monitor, compare, revise, action
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 16
Project Planning,
Scheduling, and Controlling
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1
Budgets
Delayed activities report
Slack activities report
CPM/PERT
Gantt charts
Milestone charts
Cash flow schedules
Figure 3.1
Human Quality
Resources Marketing Finance Design Production
Mgt
Project 1 Project
Manager
Mechanical Test Technician
Engineer Engineer
Project 2 Project
Manager
Electrical Computer Technician
Engineer Engineer
Figure 3.2
Project 1
Project 2
Project 3
Project 4
Time
J F M A M J J A S
Design
Prototype
Test
Revise
Production
C and D cannot
A C begin until A A C
(d) and B have
both been
B D completed B D
C cannot begin
until both A and B
A C are completed; D A C
(e) cannot begin until Dummy activity
B is completed. A
B D dummy activity is
introduced in AOA B D
Figure 3.5
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 42
A Comparison of AON and
AOA Network Conventions
Activity on Activity Activity on
Node (AON) Meaning Arrow (AOA)
B and C cannot
begin until A is
completed. D
A B D cannot begin A B D
until both B and
(f) C are completed. Dummy
A dummy C
C activity
activity is again
introduced in
AOA.
Figure 3.5
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 43
AON Example
Milwaukee Paper Manufacturing's
Activities and Predecessors
Immediate
Activity Description Predecessors
A Build internal components —
B Modify roof and floor —
C Construct collection stack A
D Pour concrete and install frame A, B
E Build high-temperature burner C
F Install pollution control system C
G Install air pollution device D, E
H Inspect and test F, G
Table 3.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 44
AON Network for
Milwaukee Paper
Activity A
A (Build Internal Components)
Start
Activity B
Start B (Modify Roof and Floor)
Activity
Figure 3.6
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 45
AON Network for
Milwaukee Paper
Activity A Precedes Activity C
A C
Start
B D
Activities A and B
Precede Activity D Figure 3.7
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 46
AON Network for
Milwaukee Paper
F
A C
E
Start H
B D G
nt sta
ne ern
s)
o m ld A
(Build Burner)
ro ll
p o In t
ls
)
C ui
H
(B
Dummy 7
E
1 6
Activity (Inspect/
Test)
Ro (M B
o f od G ll
/F ify s ta ion
lo
or (In llut ice)
) 3
D
5 Po ev
D
(Pour
Concrete/
Install Frame) Figure 3.9
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 48
Determining the Project
Schedule
Perform a Critical Path Analysis
The critical path is the longest path
through the network
The critical path is the shortest time in
which the project can be completed
Any delay in critical path activities
delays the project
Critical path activities have no slack
time
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 49
Determining the Project
Schedule
Perform a Critical Path Analysis
Activity Description Time (weeks)
A Build internal components 2
B Modify roof and floor 3
C Construct collection stack2
D Pour concrete and install frame 4
E Build high-temperature burner 4
F Install pollution control system 3
G Install air pollution device 5
H Inspect and test 2
Total Time (weeks)25
Table 3.2
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 50
Determining the Project
Schedule
Perform a Critical Path Analysis
Earliest start (ES) = earliest time at
Activity
which an activity can start,(weeks)
Description Time assuming
A Build internal components
all predecessors have been 2 completed
B Modify roof
Earliest and floor
finish (EF) = 3 earliest time at
C Construct
which ancollection stack2
activity can be finished
D Pour concrete
Latest and =install
start (LS) latestframe
time at 4which
an activity
E Build can start so
high-temperature as to not4delay
burner
the completion
F Install time ofsystem
pollution control the entire3
project
G Install air pollution device 5
Latestand
H Inspect finish
test(LF)2=latest time by
which an activity has to be finished so
Total Time
as to not(weeks)25
delay the completion time Tableof3.2
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. the entire project 3 – 51
Determining the Project
Schedule
Perform a Critical Path Analysis
Activity Name
or Symbol
A Earliest
Earliest ES EF Finish
Start
Latest LS LF Latest
Start 2 Finish
EF = ES + Activity time
ES EF = ES + Activity time
Start
0 0
2 EF of B =
ES ES of B + 3
0
Start
0 of B
B
0 0 3
3
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 57
ES/EF Network for
Milwaukee Paper
A C
0 2 2 4
2 2
Start
0 0
B
0 3
2 2
Start
0 0
= Max (2, 3) D
0
3 7
B
0 3
3
4
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 59
ES/EF Network for
Milwaukee Paper
A C
0 2 2 4
2 2
Start
0 0
B D
0 3 3 7
3 4
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.11
LS = LF – Activity time
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
13 15
0 4 2
B LS = LF
D – Activity time
G
0 3 3 7 8 13
3 4 5 LF = EF
of Project
Figure 3.12
10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0
LF =4 Min(LS
8 of 13 15
following activity) 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.12
A C F
0 2 2 4 4 7
2 4 10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.12
0 2 2 4 10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
1 4 4 8 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.12
Slack = LS – ES or Slack = LF – EF
A 0 2 0 2 0 Yes
B 0 3 1 4 1 No
C 2 4 2 4 0 Yes
D 3 7 4 8 1 No
E 4 8 4 8 0 Yes
F 4 7 10 13 6 No
G 8 13 8 13 0 Yes
H 13 15 13 15 0 Yes
Table 3.3
0 2 2 4 10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
1 4 4 8 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.13
Activity
Time
A 1 2 3 2 .11
B 2 3 4 3 .11
C 1 2 3 2 .11
D 2 4 6 4 .44
E 1 4 7 4 1.00
F 1 2 9 3 1.78
G 3 4 11 5 1.78
H 1 2 3 2 .11
Table 3.4
15 Weeks
(Expected Completion Time)
Figure 3.15
15 16 Time
Weeks Weeks
Figure 3.16
Probability
of 0.99
Probability
of 0.01
2.33 Standard Z
From Appendix I deviations
0 2.33
Figure 3.17
Table 3.5
$30,000 —
Normal
Normal —
Cost
| | |
1 2 3 Time (Weeks)
Figure 3.18
Crash Time Normal Time
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 94
Critical Path And Slack Times
For Milwaukee Paper
A C F
0 2 2 4 4 7
0 2 2 4 10 13
2 2 3
Start Slack = 0 Slack = 0 E Slack = 6 H
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D Slack = 0 G Slack = 0
0 3 3 7 8 13
1 4 4 8 8 13
3 4 5
Program 3.1
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 99
Using Microsoft Project
Program 3.2
Program 3.3
Program 3.4
Program 3.5
Program 3.6
© 2006 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 104
Using Microsoft Project
Program 3.7