2g Scam

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 9

Presented By : Kunal Chhabra

Latakshi Masrani
Tushar Agrawal
Three primary benefits of 2G networks over their
predecessors were :
 Phone conversations were digitally encrypted;
 2G systems were significantly more efficient on
the spectrum allowing for far greater mobile
phone penetration levels;
 2G introduced data services for mobile, starting
with SMS text messages.
 The 2G spectrum scam involved officials in the
government of India illegally undercharging mobile
telephony companies for frequency
allocation licenses.
 The issuing of licenses occurred in 2008, but the
scam came to public notice when the Indian Income
Tax Department was investigating political
lobbyist Nira Radia.
 The discussion around the reactions to the 2G
spectrum scam became known in the media as
the Nira Radia tapes controversy.
 
 2G licenses issued to private telecom players at
throwaway prices in 2008
 CAG: Spectrum scam has cost the
government Rs. 1.76 lacs crores
 CAG: Rules and procedures flouted while issuing
licenses
CHEAP TELECOM LICENSES
 
  Entry fee for spectrum licenses in 2008 pegged
at 2001 prices
  Mobile subscriber base had shot up to 350
million in 2008 from 4 million in 2001
NO PROCEDURES FOLLOWED
 Rules changed after the game had begun
 Cut-off date for applications advanced by a week
 Licenses issued on a first-come-first-served basis
 No proper auction process followed, no bids invited
 Raja ignored advice of TRAI, Law Ministry, Finance
Ministry
 TRAI had recommended auctioning of spectrum at
market rates
FAVOURITISM, CORPORATES ENCASH PREMIUM
 
 Unitech, Swan Telecom got licenses without any prior
telecom experience
 Swan Telecom given license even though it did not meet
eligibility criteria
 Swan got license for Rs. 1537 crore, sold 45% stake to
Etisalat for Rs. 4200 crore
 Unitech Wireless got license for Rs. 1661 crore, sold 60%
stake for Rs. 6200 crore
 All nine companies paid DoT only Rs. 10,772 crore for 2G
licences
 The CAG highlighted that the entire process of allocation of Unified
Access Service licences "lacked transparency" and was undertaken in an
"arbitrary, unfair and inequitable manner," in the process "flouting every
canon of financial propriety, rules and procedures.“

 The 77-page report of the CAG tabled in Parliament said due diligence
was not followed and even the recommendations of the telecom
regulator TRAI were "not followed in spirit".

 The report said the "presumptive" loss caused to the exchequer through
spectrum allocation to 122 licencees and 35 dual technology licences in
2007-08 was Rs 1,76,645 crore. It pegged the figures on the basis of 3G
auction held earlier this year in which the government mopped up over
Rs 67,000 crore (Rs 670 billion).

You might also like