Art criticism involves systematically analyzing and interpreting works of art. There are three main types of people who write critically about art: art critics, art historians, and curators. When analyzing a work of art, critics use various philosophical approaches such as formalist, ideological, psychoanalytic, structuralist, post-structuralist, feminist, post-colonial, and phenomenological criticism. The process of art criticism generally involves four steps: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. Film criticism similarly analyzes elements like plot, theme, acting, editing, pace, directing, score, cinematography, production design, special effects, and dialogue.
Art criticism involves systematically analyzing and interpreting works of art. There are three main types of people who write critically about art: art critics, art historians, and curators. When analyzing a work of art, critics use various philosophical approaches such as formalist, ideological, psychoanalytic, structuralist, post-structuralist, feminist, post-colonial, and phenomenological criticism. The process of art criticism generally involves four steps: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. Film criticism similarly analyzes elements like plot, theme, acting, editing, pace, directing, score, cinematography, production design, special effects, and dialogue.
Art criticism involves systematically analyzing and interpreting works of art. There are three main types of people who write critically about art: art critics, art historians, and curators. When analyzing a work of art, critics use various philosophical approaches such as formalist, ideological, psychoanalytic, structuralist, post-structuralist, feminist, post-colonial, and phenomenological criticism. The process of art criticism generally involves four steps: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. Film criticism similarly analyzes elements like plot, theme, acting, editing, pace, directing, score, cinematography, production design, special effects, and dialogue.
Art criticism involves systematically analyzing and interpreting works of art. There are three main types of people who write critically about art: art critics, art historians, and curators. When analyzing a work of art, critics use various philosophical approaches such as formalist, ideological, psychoanalytic, structuralist, post-structuralist, feminist, post-colonial, and phenomenological criticism. The process of art criticism generally involves four steps: description, analysis, interpretation, and judgment. Film criticism similarly analyzes elements like plot, theme, acting, editing, pace, directing, score, cinematography, production design, special effects, and dialogue.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 39
Art Criticism
Critical Thinking and Art Appreciation
• Art is produced by hard work, and critical thinking that involves questioning, exploration, trial and error, revision and discovery • In order to achieve critical thinking, one must put his mind in a questioning frame of mind • Art are generally silent or muted object and there are hidden meaning that may be decoded.. It must be interpreted by your own personal views from your experience accumulated from your life and social interaction Art Criticism • It is an organized approached in studying work of Art • Criticism may be personal • The interpretation and criticism may improve your aesthetic experience or with your personal interaction with the art • Art criticism helps us understand the full meaning of the artwork Art Criticism • Three types of people who write critical about arts 1. Art Critics – they describe art and assess their significance 2. Art Historian – they research about the past of the art and the culture behind it 3. Curators – they write catalog essays, wall texts, and educational material for museum and gallery exhibition Philosophical Positions in Art Criticism 1. Formalist Criticism
• It is based on the aesthetics
assessment of art that gives priority to such formal elements such as line, shapes, colors, at the expense of representational elements that involves the narrative, subject matter and symbols Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 2. Ideological Criticism
• Originate from the writing of
Karl Marx and deals with the political implication of Art. • In this view, art support a particular agenda, cultural structure, economic hierarchy or class struggle. Even artwork that is neutral is considered politcal Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 3. Psychoanalytic Criticism
• Studies art believing that it is a
product of individual’s past, unconscious urges, and their social history. • It is appropriate for works that deals with strong emotional content, intuition, dream imagery, hallucination, or fantasy Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 3. Psychoanalytic Criticism
• Sigmund Freud was the first who
uses Psychoanalytic criticism. He examine it by the light of Leonardo’s homosexual tendencies and early childhood experiences • Portrait of an Unknown Woman, La Belle Ferronnierre, 1496 by Leonardo Da Vinci Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 4. Structuralism
Criticism by analysis of the
structures of the art and its complex interrelationships of all its part that produced the whole, like a sentence determines the meaning of individual words within Originally applied on the study of language, as well as Semiotics, the study of signs in verbal or written communication Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 5. Post-Structuralism
A reaction against structuralism
and Post structuralism believes that it will result in a multiple meaning because every viewer approaches the work with a varying perspective Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 5. Post-Structuralism
To understand an object or art, it
is necessary to study both itself and the system of knowledge that produced the object Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 6. Feminist Criticism
Concern with the oppression of the
groups esp. women along with the oppression of their belief system Feminist point out that there are large number of art made by men that features nude women while practically no male nude painted by women. Also, they work for breaking the barrier that women encounter in the field of art and fine art Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 7. Post Colonial Criticism
Assumes a unique perspective on the
art and politics of colonialism, the art produced by the colonial and the ones under colonial power. It looks at the issues of social, political, religion and culture. How these elements work in the relation to colonial hegemony(colonizer controlling the colonized) Philosophical Position in Art Criticism 8. Phenomenological Criticism
• The engagement of the perceiver and
the subject creates an intellectual and emotional response based on the perceivers ideas, personal experiences, and history. Some of these are conscious and some lurks away from consciousness • In the study of art, you may learn about yourself • And interpretation may differ from other’s 4 step process of Art Criticism • Learning art criticism helps you discover the meaning of the work of art • This 4 step will help you process and organize your thoughts and build your confidence in sharing your thoughts about arts • 4 steps are: Description, Analysis, Interpretation, and Judgement Steps in Art Criticism: Description • What do I see? • What is the subject of this work? • What do I perceived? • What am I looking at?
Collect the information about the
subject without the value of judgement. Know the Credit Line Steps in Art Criticism: Description • Credit Line List of important facts on the art C or Circa that appears on date abbreviates for “about” or “around” the date it was created
Mix media means a combination of
medium or material was used
Location is the information where the
art is housed or stored Steps in Art Criticism: Analysis • How is the work organized? • How are the shapes was used and organized? • What is being emphasized? • How the color was used? • How did the artist do it?
Study the detail how the elements
and principles were used Steps in Art Criticism: Analysis • Analyze the elements, it includes a. Determining of subject by naming iconographic elements e.g. historical events, allegory, myths and other b. Selection of most distinct features c. How elements contribute to the appearance and function Steps in Art Criticism: Analysis • Analyze the elements, it includes d. Analyze the principle of design or composition e.g. stable, repetition, rhythms, symmetric, harmony, geometrics and orientation e. The use of light. Or shades of color f. The use of space and perspective Steps in Art Criticism: Analysis • Analyze the elements, it includes g. The movement and how it is achieved h. Effects of particular matter or techniques used i. balance, proportion and scale j. Emotional reaction to object or the artwork Steps in Art Criticism: Interpretation • What is the artist trying to communicate? • What is the message of the art? Identify the meaning. What are the symbols and the purpose of the art • Can I express idea of what the art probably means in one sentence? • What is the evidence that may support my claim inside and outside the art context Steps in Art Criticism: Judgement • What do you think of the work? • Criteria: what criteria do I think Determine if the art achieve its are the most appropriate for success. Why it does and why it judging the art? doesn’t achieve success? • Evidence: what is the evidence Answer the question inside the art and outside that relate for each criterion • Is it a good art? • Note: you must be able to back Describe the relevance of the art up your opinion using the in the art community and the language of art society as a whole Steps in Art Criticism: Film • Elements in film that should be considered in Analyzing Film Steps in Art Criticism: Film 1. Plot
What was the movie about?
Was it interesting? Thought provoking? Believable? How was the climax revealed? How did the setting affect the story? Steps in Art Criticism: Film 2. Themes and Tone
What was the main objective of
the story? Was it for entertainment? To educate? To shock? Or bring awareness or issue? If there is a symbolism in the movie? Does it clearly shown or did it somehow comes into play? Steps in Art Criticism: Film 3. Acting and Character
Are they believable?
Did the character come to life by the acting? Does the character somehow shown some archetypes and does it ruined or enhance the film? Steps in Art Criticism: Film 4. Direction
Did you like how the director
chose to tell the story? Is the pace too fast or slow Steps in Art Criticism: Film 5. Musical Score
Does the music supports the film?
Is it distracting or appropriate Does it help build the mood of a scene Steps in Art Criticism: Film 6. Cinematography
Were the shots framed in a unique
way to tell the story? How does the camera move? How does the lighting and coloring affects the narrative and film? Steps in Art Criticism: Film 7. Production Design
Is the set feel lived in and
believable to the story? Is too artificial or too theatrical? Is the props appropriate to the setting? Did the props depicted the right era of the story Steps in Art Criticism: Film 8. Special Effects
Is it believable? Is it too overboard or too subtle? Is it align with the era and tone of the movie? Steps in Art Criticism: Film 9. Editing
Was the editing clean or choppy
How was the transition of every scene? Is the flow consistent? Is there a unique way of how the story was told? Steps in Art Criticism: Film 10. Pace
Is the film too fast or too slow?
Was it clear and organized? Was there a certain scene that drags the film? Steps in Art Criticism: Film 11. Dialogue
Was the conversation believable?
Does the language match the era of the setting? Does the conversation bring context to the development of the plot Does the characters personality match his/her dialogue? Elements of Film 1. Plot 2. Theme 3. Acting 4. Editing 5. Pace 6. Directing 7. Score 8. Cinematography 9. Production design 10. Special effects 11. dialogue