Rizal's Ann Sucesos D Filip: Otation of e Las Islas Inas

Rizal’s annotation of
Sucesos De Las Islas

Filipinas
Group 5
Antioquia | Dimanarig | Lamo | Lim | Manguerra | Ponce | Tan
Rizal’s annotation of
Sucesos De Las Islas
Filipinas
Group 5
Antioquia | Dimanarig | Lamo | Lim | Manguerra | Ponce | Tan
Objectives:
 To analyze Rizal's idea on how to rewrite
Philippine History.
 To Compare and contrast Rizal and Morga's

different views about Filipinos and Philippine
culture
an·no·ta·tion
/ˌanəˈtāSH(ə)n/
noun
noun: annotation; plural noun: annotations
a note of explanation or comment added to

a text or diagram.
MEANING OF SUCESOS
de las islas filipinas
• Las Islas Filipinas means “The
Philippine Island” in English and
was named in honor of King Philip II
of Spain
• Sucesos means the work of an

honest observer, a versatile
bureaucrat, who knew the workings
of the administration from the
inside.
About Sucesos De Las Islas Filipinas
• One of the important works of the Philippines about the colonization
of Spain, published by Antonio De Morga in Mexico 1609.
• Explains the political, social and economical aspects of a colonizer

and the colonized country.
• The book is based on the experience and observation of Antonio De

Morga
• Annotated by Jose Rizal with a prologue by Dr. Ferdinand Blumentritt

The work consists of 8 chapters
1. Of the first discoveries of the Eastern islands.
2. Of the government of Dr. Francisco de Sande.
3. Of the government of don Gonzalo Ronquillo de Peiialosa.
4. Of the government of Dr. Santiago de Vera.
5. Of the government of Gomes Perez Dasrnariiias.
6. Of the government of don Francisco Tello.
7. Of the government of don Pedro de Acuiia.
8. An account of the Philippine Islands.
ANTONIO de

MORGA
Spanish lawyer and a government
official during the 17th Century
 Historical Anthropologist
 Author of Sucesos De Las Islas
Filipinas
 Wrote the first lay formal history of
the Philippines conquest by Spain.
 He is a doctorate in Canon and Civil
Law
Purpose of sucesos De las islas filipinas
Morga (1609) wrote that the purpose for
writing Sucesos was so he could
chronicle "the deeds achieved by our
Spaniards, the discovery, conquest,
and conversion of the Filipinas
Islands - as well as various fortunes
that they have from time to time in
the great kingdoms and among the
pagan peoples surrounding the
islands. "
WHAT
WHY
HOW
What lead jose rizal to morga’s work
• Rizal was an earnest seeker of truth and this marked him as
historian
• He had a burning desire to know exactly the condition of the
Philippines when the Spaniards came ashore to the islands
• His theory was that the country was economically self-sufficient and
prosperous. Entertained the idea that it had a lively and vigorous
community
• He believed the conquest of the Spaniards contributed in part to
the decline of the Philippine’s rich traditions and culture.
What lead jose rizal to morga’s work
• He then decided to undertake the annotation of Antonio de
Morga’s Sucesos De Las Islas Filipinas.
• His personal friendship with Ferdinand Blumentritt provided the

inspiration for doing a new edition of Morga’s Sucesos.
• Devoting four months research and writing and almost a year to get
his manuscript published in Paris in January 1890.
Why jose rizal chose morga’s work
• Rizal felt Morga to be more "objective" than the religious writers

whose accounts included many miracle stories.
• Morga, compared to religious chroniclers, was more sympathetic to

the indios; and finally, Morga was not only an eyewitness but a
major actor in the events he narrates.
• Rizal's second consideration for the choice of Morga was that it was
the only civil, as opposed to religious or ecclesiastical, history of the
Philippines written during the colonial period.
• The third consideration for the choice of Morga was Rizal’s opinion
that this secular account was more objective, more trustworthy,
than those written by the religious missionaries which were
liberally sprinkled with tales of miracles and apparitions.
• The fourth consideration in Rizal's choice of the Morga was that it
appeared more sympathetic, at least in parts, to the indios, in
contrast to the friar accounts, many of which were biased or downright
racist in tone and interpretation
• The fifth and last consideration was that Morga was an eyewitness,
and therefore a primary source, on the Philippines and its people at
the point of first contact with Spain.
How did jose rizal know about morga’s work
• Rizal found the book while he was in London at the British

Museum’s reading room.
• He hand copied the whole 351 pages of the book.
• And annotated every chapter of it.
• It was the first historical work on the Philippines by a Filipino. It is

the first history written from the point of view of the colonized not the
colonizer.
Rizal’s annotation
FIRST: SECOND:
straightforward the annotations

historical annotations, which, though
where Rizal amplifies historically based,
or corrects the reflect his strong
original. anticlerical bias.
Rizal’s Purpose of annotating morga’s work
• To awaken the consciousness of the Filipinos regarding their glorious

ways of the past
• To correct what has been distorted about the Philippines due to

Spanish Conquest
• To prove that the Filipinos are civilized/advanced even before the

coming of the Spaniards
• The people of the Philippines had a culture on their own, before the
coming of the Spaniards
• The people of the pre-Hispanic Philippines is advanced, has high
literacy rate, self sufficient and has smooth foreign relations.
• Filipinos were decimated, demoralized, exploited and ruined by the
Spanish colonization.
• The present state of the Philippines was not necessarily superior to
its past.
• In his annotation, he included the colonial history of the

Philippines, being in prolonged periods of suffering that many
people have been subjected to.
• “The Philippines was depopulated, impoverished and retorted,

astounded by metaphor, with no confidence in their past, still
without faith in her present and without faltering hope in the
future”.
Ferdinand Bluementritt’s
prologue to sucesos de las islas
filipinas
• He wrote it in Spanish even though

German is his native language.
• Encouraged Rizal to write about the
Philippines’ pre-colonial History.
• He praised Rizal’s works as “Scholarly
and well-thought out”.
• Noted that the book is so rare that very
few libraries has it and guarded it like a
treasure
Bluementritt criticized rizal’s explanation on two accounts
• He noticed that Rizal had committed the mistakes of many

modern historians who judged events in the past
• He said that Rizal shouldn’t condemn Catholicism even though

they didn’t do any effort to suppress calls for reform. He should
just keep the critique about religious orders in the Philippines
The “SUCESOS” as annotated by Rizal,
appeared for the first time in the Philippines
sixty eight years later when a publisher in
Manila, published the new work in 1958, to
contribute his bit to the national effort to honor
Rizal. The present work is the sixth volume of
the Series of Writings of Jose Rizal which the
Jose Rizal National Centennial Commission has
no published in commemoration of his birth.
“ To foretell the destiny of a
nation, it is necessary to open the
books that tell of her past
“ JOSE RIZAL

Rizal's Ann Sucesos D Filip: Otation of e Las Islas Inas

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rizal's Ann Sucesos D Filip: Otation of e Las Islas Inas

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rizal's Ann Sucesos D Filip: Otation of e Las Islas Inas

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rizal’s annotation of

Sucesos De Las Islas

 To Compare and contrast Rizal and Morga's

a note of explanation or comment added to

• Sucesos means the work of an

• Explains the political, social and economical aspects of a colonizer

• The book is based on the experience and observation of Antonio De

• Annotated by Jose Rizal with a prologue by Dr. Ferdinand Blumentritt

• His personal friendship with Ferdinand Blumentritt provided the

• Rizal felt Morga to be more "objective" than the religious writers

• Morga, compared to religious chroniclers, was more sympathetic to

• Rizal found the book while he was in London at the British

• He hand copied the whole 351 pages of the book.

• And annotated every chapter of it.

• It was the first historical work on the Philippines by a Filipino. It is

straightforward the annotations

• To awaken the consciousness of the Filipinos regarding their glorious

• To correct what has been distorted about the Philippines due to

• To prove that the Filipinos are civilized/advanced even before the

• In his annotation, he included the colonial history of the

• “The Philippines was depopulated, impoverished and retorted,

• He wrote it in Spanish even though

• He noticed that Rizal had committed the mistakes of many

• He said that Rizal shouldn’t condemn Catholicism even though

You might also like