This document summarizes sections 340-352 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with offenses affecting the administration of justice. Some key points:
- These sections cover offenses like intentionally giving false evidence or fabricating false evidence.
- Courts have the power to conduct preliminary inquiries into such offenses and forward complaints to magistrates. They can also try certain offenses summarily or forward more serious offenses to magistrates.
- The sections provide for appeals of convictions under these offenses and special procedures for dealing with witnesses who refuse to answer questions or fail to appear.
- A case example is provided where the court refused to become a complainant at the request of a husband in a disputed marital issue.
This document summarizes sections 340-352 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with offenses affecting the administration of justice. Some key points:
- These sections cover offenses like intentionally giving false evidence or fabricating false evidence.
- Courts have the power to conduct preliminary inquiries into such offenses and forward complaints to magistrates. They can also try certain offenses summarily or forward more serious offenses to magistrates.
- The sections provide for appeals of convictions under these offenses and special procedures for dealing with witnesses who refuse to answer questions or fail to appear.
- A case example is provided where the court refused to become a complainant at the request of a husband in a disputed marital issue.
Original Description:
Offences affecting the adminstration of justice under Criminal Procedure Code
This document summarizes sections 340-352 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with offenses affecting the administration of justice. Some key points:
- These sections cover offenses like intentionally giving false evidence or fabricating false evidence.
- Courts have the power to conduct preliminary inquiries into such offenses and forward complaints to magistrates. They can also try certain offenses summarily or forward more serious offenses to magistrates.
- The sections provide for appeals of convictions under these offenses and special procedures for dealing with witnesses who refuse to answer questions or fail to appear.
- A case example is provided where the court refused to become a complainant at the request of a husband in a disputed marital issue.
This document summarizes sections 340-352 of the Indian Penal Code, which deal with offenses affecting the administration of justice. Some key points:
- These sections cover offenses like intentionally giving false evidence or fabricating false evidence.
- Courts have the power to conduct preliminary inquiries into such offenses and forward complaints to magistrates. They can also try certain offenses summarily or forward more serious offenses to magistrates.
- The sections provide for appeals of convictions under these offenses and special procedures for dealing with witnesses who refuse to answer questions or fail to appear.
- A case example is provided where the court refused to become a complainant at the request of a husband in a disputed marital issue.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5
OFFENCES AFFECTING
THE ADMINISTRATION ISHA CHAVAN
ROLL NO. 28 OF JUSTICE • Chapter XXVI includes the provisions as to offences affecting the administration of justice. • It includes sections 340 – 352. • Section 340 - When an offence is committed in relation of a public servant or a court with respect to section 195 (1) (b) the sanction of the public servant or the court has to be obtained first. Any civil/ revenue/ criminal court can proceed under this section & hold preliminary inquiry & record findings & complaint to First Class Magistrate. • Section 341 – An appeal lies under this section from an order passed under sec 340 by a civil court must be deemed to be criminal appeal. Sub – section (2) that order under sections 340 & 341 shall be final and shall not be subject to revision. • Section 342 – Any court which is dealing with an application made to it for filing a complaint under sections 340/341 has the power to make such orders. • Sections 343 – This section lays down the manner in which the complaints made under section 340 & 341 are to be dealt with and states such complaints to be dealt as they were instituted on a police report. Sub- section (2) states that the proceedings out of which an inquiry has started should come to a close. • Section 344 – (1) states that any witness appearing in such proceedings had knowingly or willfully given false evidence or had fabricated false evidence should be tried summarily and the court shall take cognizance of the offence. The offender should be given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause why he should not be punished and sentence him to imprisonment for a term up to 3 months or fine up to 500 rupees or with both. • (2) In every such case the Court shall follow, as nearly as may be practicable, the procedure prescribed for summary trials. (3) makes clear that the power of the court to make complaint under Section 340 is not affected even if the court chooses not to take any action. •(4) gives the court the power to stop the further proceedings of the trial if it notices that an appeal or a revision application has been preferred against the judgement or order in the main proceedings. • Section 345 - enables a court to preserve its decorum and maintain its dignity. The Court is not bound to any evidence it can rely on its own opinion of what happened and can detain the offender in custody, take cognizance of the offence and sentence him. • Section 346 - states that where the court considers that an offence under section 345 cannot be tried summarily by it or requires a heavier sentence, it can after recording the facts and the statement of the accused, forward them to a Magistrate in the ordinary way as if it were instituted on a police report. • Section 347 - states that where the court considers that an offence under section 345 cannot be tried summarily by it or requires a heavier sentence, it can after recording the facts and the statement of the accused, forward them to a Magistrate in the ordinary way as if it were instituted on a police report. • Section 348 - states that the offence described under Section 345 is curable on the satisfactory apology made to the court even after the procedure laid down in Sections 345 or 346 has been followed. • Section 349 - lays down special provision regarding the witness refusing to answer the questions as required by it under section 17 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. • Section 350 - says that if a witness who is summoned fails to appear without just excuse, the court may try summarily, after hearing his defence. And sentence him to a fine not exceeding Rs. 100. Also, the court is to follow the procedure prescribed for summary trial. • Section 351 – (1) states that any person sentenced by any court other than a High Court under sections 344, 345, 349, or 350 may, notwithstanding anything contained in the Criminal Procedure Code appeal to the court to which decrees or orders made in such court are ordinarily. (2) The provisions of Chapter XXIX shall, so far as they arc applicable, apply to appeals under this section, and the Appellate Court may alter or reverse the finding, or reduce or reverse the sentence appealed against. (3) An appeal from such conviction by a Court of small causes shall lie to the Court of Session within which such Court is situated. • (4) An appeal from such conviction by any Registrar of Sub-Registrar deemed to be a Civil Court by virtue of a direction issued under section 347 shall lie to the Court of Session for the sessions division within which the office of such Registrar of Sub-Registrar is situated. • Section 352 - states that a Magistrate who refuses to set aside an order sanctioning prosecution on the charge of perjury cannot try the case himself. Also, a Sessions Judge cannot try a person whose trial has been directed by him for the offences of giving false evidence committed in the course of judicial proceedings of a criminal nature. • Jaswinder Singh vs Paramjit Kaur [1986 Cr LJ 1398 (P&H)] In this case, a petition was filed by the wife complaining that the husband had made false denial about the factum of the second marriage and the matter be inquired into under Section 193 of the Indian Penal Code. The husband contended that the findings recorded by the lower court that the allegations made about the second marriage being not truthful, a complaint be filed against the wife. The court held that they cannot in such contentious issues, enter into facts and become a complainant at the request of the husband. The proceeding was maintainable.
Subject: Professional Ethics B.A.Ll.B-Ixth Sem Subject Teacher: Dr. Md. Junaid Study Material of Unit-Iii - (C) (A) (B) (C) Topic: Professional Misconduct Under Advocate Act 1961