Barilla Case Presentation - Final
Barilla Case Presentation - Final
Barilla Case Presentation - Final
Company Background
Barilla was founded in 1875 as a small pasta shop. High quality products, Innovative marketing programs, created a strong brand name. Constructed a 1.25 million square feet pasta plant drove it into dept. Sold the company to US MNC which struggled to payoff the acquisition. US MNC Sold it back to Pietro Barilla. Capital Investments, organizational changes, improving market conditions helped company achieve annual growth rate of over 21%. It 1992, Barilla became the largest pasta manufacturer in the world.
Company Overview
Worlds largest pasta manufacturer with 35% MS in Italy and 22% MS in Europe 50% of company revenue comes from North and 50% from South Italy Flat growth in Italian Market, 20%+ growth in international markets
BARILLA
Barilla
Voiello
Braibanti
Bakery
Fresh Bread
Catering
International
Customer Segments
Distribution Channels
Distribution to small retail shops was direct from the Central Distribution Centers (CDCs). Distribution to the supermarkets went through intermediate distribution centers, either owned by the chain, or operated by a third party representing multiple independent supermarkets. Fresh product was distributed through a network of brokers.
Huge number of SKU but only few reflected on shelf space of customers
The solution decided was to implement JITD but that faced internal and external resistance
Demand Fluctuations
Demand Fluctuations
Demand Variability strained Barillas manufacturing and logistics operations. Difficult to meet unexpected demand due to specific sequence of pasta production necessitated by the tight heat and humidity specifications in the tunnel kiln. On the other hand, holding more finished goods was expensive. Distributors faced stock outs and lesser service levels. Reason is customer is changing as they do not have enough room in their stores and warehouses. Nearly impossible to anticipate demand swings. Vitalis Suggestion: Company should look at all of the distributors shipment data and send only what is needed at the stores rather than sending product to the distributors according to their internal planning process.
Is JITD feasible ?
The JITD program is a futuristic program. The reasons for implementations are as follows:
The shelf space at Store levels and Distributor warehouses are limited and hence to stock the ever increasing SKU, they need more space. More space comes at a cost and hence the ROI of distributor will come down or the company will have to increase the margins of the products. In both cases the profitability of the chain takes a hit. Average 3-6% stock out means direct loss in sales. Unplanned and random orders make manufacturing plant function at less than efficiency. Hence increased CAPEX.
2. Taking the above as prototype, the Top 20% of GD/DO in ITALY should be presented with the findings and the profits to the channel partners 3. The same can then be extended to the self owned warehouse channel to service small outlets
Will the DO/GD find the findings conclusive? What should be the next steps?
After the successful roll out at the barilla owned warehouses, the next big step is to convince the GD/PO to rollout the program. The selection of GD/PO should be based on the following parameters:
A big and loyal Barilla distributor with a long business relationship Closer to CDC to reduce Delivery time, which would act as an incentive for DO/GD to cooperate. Greater degree of randomness in order generated by GD/DO each week Space constrained Warehouse.
Will the DO/GD find the findings conclusive? What should be the next steps?
The GD/DO who meets the above criteria should be convinced roll out the JITD program. The use of incentive is optional. The incentive can be as below:
Faster delivery. Special promotions. Dedicated manpower to monitor the program. Extra margins (not preferable but as last resort).
Recommendations
SKU Rationalization. Discount Scheme Rationalization. Reduction in replenishment time(2 weeks to 3 days). Common Interest: More profit and inventory turn over. Stock out should be reduced from 6% to 1%. Cultural change. Better Demand Forecast.