Anishish Sharan
Anishish Sharan
Anishish Sharan
Project
Optimization
• Genetic Algorithm
Brief Description:
Until now the dynamics of the market maker's This paper starts in this direction by considering A stochastic model is developed for this. The
pricing decision has either been ignored, treated optimal pricing for a single market maker in the authors have used methods of dynamic
in an intuitive manner, or addressed without market. programming to characterize optimal pricing
taking the relevant internal and external factors of policies.
the market maker into account.
Objective
Function
•
• (x) = price*x
43 25795.35 41.35 43.78 17199.48 41.37 43.75 12901.50 41.33 43.82 21497.41 41.30 43.72
44 26399.91 41.82 44.51 17604.09 41.89 44.53 13206.21 41.86 44.51 22002.03 41.88 44.51
45 27006.61 42.43 45.50 18010.94 42.34 45.50 13513.04 42.36 45.51 22508.76 42.34 45.51
46 27615.09 42.90 46.51 18419.56 42.87 46.50 13821.64 42.89 46.51 23017.24 42.87 46.51
47 28225.32 43.33 47.52 18829.90 43.25 47.51 14132.21 43.39 47.50 23527.50 43.48 47.52
48 28837.23 44.19 48.50 19242.22 43.83 48.50 14444.44 43.89 48.51 24039.85 43.86 48.51
49 29451.71 44.31 49.50 19656.05 44.15 49.51 14758.35 44.37 49.52 24554.06 44.34 49.50
50 30067.35 44.71 50.51 20071.73 44.60 50.52 15074.07 45.00 50.52 25069.90 44.79 50.50
51 30684.97 45.45 51.51 20489.85 45.34 51.51 15392.43 45.48 51.50 25587.11 45.16 51.52
52 31304.39 45.55 52.50 20909.42 45.78 52.51 15711.22 45.94 52.53 26107.31 45.79 52.50
53 31925.83 46.06 53.50 21330.63 46.26 53.52 16033.68 46.40 53.50 26628.61 46.28 53.50
54 32548.25 46.92 54.53 21753.83 47.05 54.51 16356.59 46.98 54.51 27151.76 46.90 54.51
55 33174.23 47.49 55.50 22179.43 47.42 55.51 16681.49 47.18 55.52 27676.92 47.25 55.50
56 33800.88 47.93 56.51 22606.13 48.07 56.51 17007.95 47.71 56.53 28203.77 47.95 56.50
57 34429.73 48.27 57.51 23035.40 48.37 57.50 17337.64 48.33 57.51 28732.53 48.36 57.50
58 35059.77 48.95 58.51 23465.44 48.88 58.51 17668.74 48.89 58.50 29262.82 48.97 58.51
59 35692.56 49.40 59.51 23898.00 49.59 59.51 18000.92 49.48 59.51 29795.48 49.34 59.50
Sanity Check of the algorithm
• Upon comparing it with fixed step gradient descent of step size 0.3,
we can see that the values that we get are still very close for price =
55
• Note 1: Fixed step gradient descent was implemented on univariate
parts of the objective function, as the objective function can be
separated into two univariate objective function, this is done by the
authors during classical optimization
• Note 2: The number of stocks in the inventory doesn’t change the bid
and ask price for the market maker in this case
Fixed step size – Optimization method
Thank You