Monopoly: Imba Nccu Managerial Economics Jack Wu
Monopoly: Imba Nccu Managerial Economics Jack Wu
Monopoly: Imba Nccu Managerial Economics Jack Wu
IMBA NCCU
Managerial Economics
Jack Wu
MARKET
Pure
(Perfect) competition – least freedom in pricing
Monopolistic competition
Medical clinic
Oligopoly
Hospital
anti-virus software, microcomputer operating system
Monopoly – single supplier of good or a service
with no close substitute: most freedom in pricing
MARKET POWER
Definition: ability to influence price
monopoly -- single supplier of good or a service with no
close substitute
oligopoly -- few suppliers
250
infra-marginal
units
150
Price ($ per unit)
130
demand (marginal benefit)
70
marginal revenue
50
-50
Quantity (Million units a year)
REVENUE, COST, AND PROFIT
Total Marginal Total Marginal
Price Revenue Revenue Cost ($) Cost Profit
($) Sales ($) ($) ($) ($)
200 0.0 0 50 -50
190 0.2 38 190 52 10 -40
180 0.4 72 170 56 20 16
170 0.6 102 150 62 30 40
160 0.8 128 130 70 40 58
150 1.0 150 110 80 50 70
140 1.2 168 90 92 60 76
130 1.4 182 70 106 70 76
120 1.6 192 50 122 80 70
110 1.8 198 30 140 90 58
100 2.0 200 10 160 100 40
90 2.2 198 -10 182 110 16
MONOPOLY: PROFIT MAXIMUM, I
Operate at scale where
marginal revenue = marginal cost
Justification:
If marginal revenue > marginal cost, sell more and increase profit.
If marginal revenue < marginal cost, sell less and increase profit.
OPERATING SCALE:
PROFIT MAXIMUM
MONOPOLY: PROFIT MAXIMUM, III
contribution margin = total revenue less variable cost
profit-maximizing scale: selling additional unit does not
change the contribution margin
DEMAND CHANGE
Find new scale where marginal revenue = marginal cost
should change price
Pepsi
raisedprice by 6.9%
what about advertising?
ANSWER
Pepsi should increase advertising expenditure for two
reasons:
price increase --> increase in incremental margin;
Pepsi’s increase in advertising will attract some
marginal consumers -- those who are brand-switchers,
relatively less loyal to Pepsi/Coke; so Coke’s demand
will be more sensitive to advertising (higher advertising
elasticity)
DOLLAR GENERAL
“Our customer lives within three to five miles of the store,
knows we’re there”
cut advertising from 3.8% to 0.2% of revenue
demand 60
Price (Cents per unit)
marginal revenue
0 300 0 150
produces less
marginal expenditure
marginal benefit
MONOPSONY SCALE
marginal expenditure
400
Price ($ per ton)
supply
350
273
marginal benefit
0 6 8