This document discusses three ethics case studies related to civil engineering:
1) Juan Dela Cruz copied structural plans from another engineer's work without permission, violating ethical canons related to plagiarism.
2) Jose's boss changed a design specification to favor a particular pipe supplier, raising potential issues around conflicts of interest and improper influence on engineering decisions.
3) Steve signed off on engineering plans for a major building project even though unlicensed engineers worked on some aspects of the design, violating ethical rules requiring licensed professionals to fully supervise and take responsibility for engineering work.
This document discusses three ethics case studies related to civil engineering:
1) Juan Dela Cruz copied structural plans from another engineer's work without permission, violating ethical canons related to plagiarism.
2) Jose's boss changed a design specification to favor a particular pipe supplier, raising potential issues around conflicts of interest and improper influence on engineering decisions.
3) Steve signed off on engineering plans for a major building project even though unlicensed engineers worked on some aspects of the design, violating ethical rules requiring licensed professionals to fully supervise and take responsibility for engineering work.
This document discusses three ethics case studies related to civil engineering:
1) Juan Dela Cruz copied structural plans from another engineer's work without permission, violating ethical canons related to plagiarism.
2) Jose's boss changed a design specification to favor a particular pipe supplier, raising potential issues around conflicts of interest and improper influence on engineering decisions.
3) Steve signed off on engineering plans for a major building project even though unlicensed engineers worked on some aspects of the design, violating ethical rules requiring licensed professionals to fully supervise and take responsibility for engineering work.
This document discusses three ethics case studies related to civil engineering:
1) Juan Dela Cruz copied structural plans from another engineer's work without permission, violating ethical canons related to plagiarism.
2) Jose's boss changed a design specification to favor a particular pipe supplier, raising potential issues around conflicts of interest and improper influence on engineering decisions.
3) Steve signed off on engineering plans for a major building project even though unlicensed engineers worked on some aspects of the design, violating ethical rules requiring licensed professionals to fully supervise and take responsibility for engineering work.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7
Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila
College of Engineering and Technology
Civil Engineering Department
CIV 0322 CE Laws, Ethics and Contracts
Case Analysis in Ethics
Dr. J. BERLIN P. JUANZON CE, MBA, MSCM
ETHICAL CASE ANALYSIS CASE 1 Juan Dela Cruz is a civil engineer by profession with special training in transportation engineering. His client asked him to prepare a house structural plan “just like the guy down the road.” Dela Cruz obtained the plans, copied them and signed, sealed and dated them. What fundamental canon/s did Dela Cruz violated? Case 2 Jose is a professional civil engineer in the Philippines . He designs a complicated pipeline system and determines that lined ductile iron pipe is the only appropriate material to use to protect the health and welfare of the public. His extensive analysis determines that PVC, HDPE and pre-stressed concrete (PSC) are not appropriate for the conditions. Jose’s boss is a CE, but loves the guy who sells PSC pipe and changes the spec to PSC to help him out. What potential issues do Jose or his boss have with their CE Licenses? What could happen? Case 3 Steve is the VP of an engineering firm. He has BS in Civil engineering with 20 years experience (much of it in project management and client relations). He is one of two people with a CE license in the firm. The firm designs a major building in Makati. His firm divides the work into five areas he supervises: structural, electrical, process, mechanical and architectural. The structural design chief is not licensed, nor is the electrical section chief. When the project is to be bid and permitted, Steve signs all the plans. What ethical problems do you see? GROUP ACTIVITY Lorenzo was a newly graduate Civil Engineer from a prestigious school in Laguna, and passed the CE board licensure exam the same year. He was recommended by his former professor to a friend who owns an engineering firm. He was trained to used a licensed structural software which was installed in his personal laptop for company use. Lorenzo resigned from the firm the following year and still continue to use the licensed structural software installed in his personal laptop in his own personal practice and even in the new company he is now working with. What fundamental CE canon/s did Lorenzo violated? Explain. (Ethical Theory) THANK YOU FOR LISTENING… Introduction to CE Ethics