Final 6-8 Writing Module
Final 6-8 Writing Module
Final 6-8 Writing Module
1.Standard W1
2.Difference between persuasion and argument
3.Analyzing examples
4.How to write an argument
Warm Up
• What was your best writing experience?
• What was your worst writing experience?
Argument Writing from Text
CCR.W.1
• Write arguments to support claims in an
analysis of substantive topics or texts, using
valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient
evidence.
Sci.
Claim
Evidence
Reasoning
Arguments across disciplines
• “Although arguments in different fields use the same elements
(claims, warrants, etc.), fields have different goals for
argumentation, degrees of formality and precision, and modes
of resolution, with the consequence that evaluative judgments
should be made within fields, not between fields."
Also. . .
• There are "multiple differences between academic argument
and public argument."
~Miller & Charney
Common Core: What is Argument?
OR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6dnbAoJl6U
Elements of Argument
• Claim
• Cite
o Evidence: relevant and verifiable
• Clarify
o Warrant: explanation of how the evidence supports the
claim; often common sense rules, laws, scientific
principles or research, and well-considered definitions.
o Backing: support for the warrant (often extended
definitions)
• Qualifications and Counter-arguments:
acknowledgement of differing claims
Is it argument or persuasion?
Is it Argument or Persuasion?
Is it Argument or Persuasion?
Digging Deeper Into Argument
• Claims
• Evidence
• Warrant
• Counterclaims
Four corners
• The Supreme Court was right to reverse the ban on the sale of
violent video games to children.
• Strongly Agree? Agree? Disagree? Strongly Disagree? Write
for 3 minutes on your opinion.
• Go to corner of room matching your response. In your groups,
you have several minutes to create an argument: claim,
convincing evidence (yes, you can use your laptops), and
explanation to present a two-minute argument to the rest of the
groups.
Grade-level samples
• Group by grade level and read associated sample. Grade
6 (Dear Mr. Sandler)
Grade 7 (Video Cameras In Classrooms)
Grade 8 (Shut Down Your Screen Week)
• Discuss what the writing reveals about characteristics of
argument writing (according to CCSS).
• Label the elements of an argument within the sample.
• Count off by 3’s. Form a group with your like number and
share your sample group’s findings. Generate a list of
characteristics across samples: what are the qualities of
argument writing, as revealed by these samples (in
connection to standards)? Be prepared to share your
group’s list.
Argument Writing Process
Choosing an arguable issue
• Arguments need. . .
– An issue – Arguments fail with. . .
– An arguer • No disagreement or reason to
argue
– An audience • Risky or trivial issues
– Common ground • Difficulty establishing common
– A forum ground
– Audience outcomes • Standoffs or fights that result in
negative outcomes
Building a Topic Bank
School issues Local Issues State Issues National Global Issues
Issues
Narrowing a topic
Preventing Bullying
Tex
Name calling
tin
g
bad
na
me
s
Elements of Argument
• Claim
• Cite
o Evidence: relevant and verifiable
• Clarify
o Warrant: explanation of how the evidence supports the
claim; often common sense rules, laws, scientific
principles or research, and well-considered definitions.
o Backing: support for the warrant (often extended
definitions)
• Qualifications and Counter-arguments:
acknowledgement of differing claims
How to Construct an Argument
• Develop a main claim/strong thesis
• Types of claims
• Citing evidence
• Organizing the argument
DDOE Revised Writing Rubrics
32
DDOE Revised Writing Rubrics
33
Writing Rubric: Changes
34
It is strongly suggested that
teachers use the DE Writing Rubric
vs. SBAC Full Write Rubric
Delaware Writing Rubrics SBAC Performance Task Rubrics
Grade Specific Grade Bands – teachers need to know that not all
standards represented are for one grade – watch
asterisks
Discourse Specific Discourse specific
Optional use of research standards; can be used for Research standards are part of this rubric- not
stand alone, text based, or performance tasks optional – this rubric is meant for scoring
performance tasks
Ideal for instruction – analytic nature Meant for high stakes assessment to give holistic
feedback
Standards are listed Standards are not listed
Score point of a 4 is above grade level – standards Score point of a 4 is an extension of the grade level
are noted; “skillfully” if standard language has not standard in the 3
changed from one grade to the next
Language/Conventions Table by grade level with Language/Conventions table by grade band –
standards listed standards not listed
35
What do you think?
• Based upon your grade level rubric, score of 3:
– What do your students need to know?
– What do your students need to be able to do?
– WOWs!?
– Whoas!?
36
Activity: Where to start instruction
1. With a partner, analyze a writing
sample(s) from your classe(s).
• Using the rubric, what core descriptors
are used effectively?
• What core descriptors are missing?
2. Take a look at the W1 learning
progression for your grade level.
• Where should instruction begin for
this student?
37
Reflection
• Why is it important to know core descriptors?
• How will knowing the core descriptors impact classroom
instruction for all learners?
• Why is it important to know the expectations across grade
levels?
38
Gradual Release Model
3. Collaborative Learning-
opportunities for students to problem
solve with peers. Teacher monitors.
39
Accommodations for All Learners
• Build upon students’ strengths, interests, and needs
• Build in time every day for review of important concepts
• Make tasks meaningful
• Use symbols/signals to help students follow directions, i.e., arrow to continue, stop sign to stop
• Chunk/highlight key passages using markers or highlighting tape
• Use clear overlays that won’t ruin the book
• Allow students to dictate their stories into a tape recorder
40
Students With Disabilities (SWD)
Students with disabilities are a heterogeneous group with one common characteristic: the
presence of disabling conditions that significantly hinder their abilities to benefit from general
education (IDEA 34 CFR§300.39, 2004).
Teacher should:
4. Be familiar with Standards and decide if student needs to master whole standard or parts
of the standard
5. Analyze test results and determine students Present Level of Performance (PLEP) and
determine how far off grade level the student is working. Be sure to document all data
sources used
6. Define the student in terms that translate directly into instructional intervention
Lessons designed with Universal Design of Learning Principles will allow the student the most
access to grade level standards with minimal to no barriers.
41
Activity
Divide group in half.
Group A read ‘Recommendations’ 1 and 2 and concluding statement
Group B read ‘Recommendations’ 3 and 4 and concluding statement
Each group share out their opinion on the piece of the article that they read.
Do you find the recommendations to be of value? Would you try or have you tried any of these recommendations in your
classroom?
Once finished the groups can also look at the link : http://www.udlcenter.org/advocacy/faq_guides/common_core
42
Instructional, Implementation and General Resources
• Application of the CCSS for Students with Disabilities from the Common Core
State Standards Initiative: http://www.corestandards.org/assets/application-to-
students-with-disabilities.pdf
• The IDEA Partnership’s collection of tools and resources on the Common Core and
assessments: www.ideapartnership.org/index.php?
option=com_content&view=article&id=1522&Itemid=151
• http://www.leadered.com/pdf/Special%20Ed%20&%20CCSS%20white
%20paper.pdf
• ASCD webinar and related materials on Common Core State Standards: Where
Does Differentiation Fit?
http://www.ascd.org/professional-development/webinars/tomlinson-and-britt-
webinar.aspx
43
English Language Learners
A single approach to writing will not meet the needs of all students
Quality Instruction has the greatest effect on achievement for these students
• systematic phonics in grades K–1, cooperative learning, and direct instruction
in comprehension and vocabulary skills in all grades
• Explicit vocabulary instruction
• Cooperative learning groups
• Small group tutoring
• Frequent assessment and regrouping
44
Table Group Work
In a group of 2 to 3 divide and read the
article: Effective Instruction for English
Language .
45
ELL Proficiency Levels
• http://languagemagazine.com/?page_id=31244
Calderon whole school approach to ELL and CCSS
• http://widaatwcer.blogspot.com/2012/10/
understanding-proficiency-levels-using.html
• http://www.learnalberta.ca/content/eslapb/
video.html#20 potential videos for ELL
46
Tying It All Together
• Waffles vs. Pancakes
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=r4A5zoRuPoQ
References
• Caine, Karen. Writing to Persuade: Mini-lessons to Help Students Plan, Draft, and Revise. Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann, 2008.
• Daniels, Harvey “Smokey,” and Nancy Steineke. Texts and Lessons for Content-Area Reading. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann, 2011.
• Dean, Deborah. Strategic Writing: The Writing Process and Beyond in Secondary Schools. Urbana, IL:
NCTE, 2006.
• ---. What Works in Writing Instruction: Research and Practices. Urbana, IL: NCTE, 2010.
• Graff, Gerald, and Cathy Birkenstein. They Say, I Say: The Moves that Matter in Academic Writing. New
York: Norton, 2006.
• Hillocks, George, Jr. Teaching Argument Writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 2011.
• Miller, Carolyn R., and Davida Charney. “Persuasion, Audience, and Argument.” Handbook of Research on
Writing. Ed. Charles Bazerman. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008. 583-598.
• Smagorinsky, Peter, et al. The Dynamics of Writing Instruction: A Structured Process Approach for Middle and
High School. Portsmouth, NH: 2010.
Resources
49
Self-Paced eLearning Courses
• ELA/Literacy: CCSS Writing Standards and the Delaware
Writing
Rubrics
– Elementary
– Secondary
• Register through PDMS
– https://login.doe.k12.de.us/
• ELA/Literacy eLearning Course Catalog
– http://www.doe.k12.de.us/Page/2427
50
Learning Progressions Webinar
• https://sas.elluminate.com/site/external/recording/playback/link
/meeting.jnlp?suid=M.D1D5EDABF616B45B58C2E41B464A
72&sid=2011040
51
Argument Resource Packet
Resources to further clarify for your students.
Introducing others’ ideas
• Put source names either before the idea [Painter insists that the
hula hoop can help fight diabetes] or after the idea in
parentheses [Others find the idea ridiculous (Smith, Wilson)].
• Use vivid and precise verb signals more than “says” or
“believes” to show how an author feels or how an idea might
relate to other ideas: agrees, recommends, insists, explains
• Make sure the idea adds to the point you are making. Dropping
in unrelated quotes or names diminishes your credibility.
SHOW how the idea contributes to YOUR argument.
Quoting
Level of
Evidence Type of evidence importance to
audience
• Day 6: Logic and organization, transitions
• Day 7: Drafting, returning to models
• Day 8: Peer evaluation
• Day 9: Revision and further inquiry if necessary
• Day 10: Polishing; sentence combining and word choice
• Day 11: Due with addressed envelope