Pragmatic

REFERENCES AND
INFERENCES
Nguyen Thi Kim Anh
References
Definition of reference
Referring expression & its types
Characteristics of reference
Reasons to use reference in Language
Types of reference
Referential and attribute use of referring expressions

Definition
Reference: an act in which

a speaker/ writer uses
linguistic forms to enable
listeners/ readers to
identify something (Yule,
2010:131)
The categories of referring expressions
(1)
Proper
nouns
(2)
(4)
Referring
Definite
Pronouns expressions noun
phrases
(3)
Indefinite
noun
phrases
Cohesion consists in continuity of referential
meaning (relatedness of reference) ;
Personal (communication goal of referent)
Demonstrative (proximity of referent)

REFERENCE
Comparative ( similarity to preceding referent)

Types of reference
a. Personal reference:
Personal pronouns (e.g., I, he, she)
Possesive pronouns (e.g., mine, hers, his)
Possesive determiners (e.g., my, your, her)
English is considered an international language. It is a spoken

by more than 260 million people all over the world.
I have met some friends this morning. They told me you had
gone by her car
b. Demonstrative reference: essentially a form of verbal pointing
the speaker identifies the referent by locating it on a scale of proximity.
this, these and here imply proximity to the speaker
that, those and there imply distance from the speaker.
Like personals, the demonstratives regularly refer exophorically to

something within the context of situation.
E.g. How do you like a cruise in that yacht?

c. Comparative reference: contributes to textual cohesion by
setting up a relation of contrast
adjectives as same, identical, equal
adjectives in a comparative degree such as bigger, faster
adverbs such as identically, likewise, so, such
E.g. She has a similarly furnished room to mine.
The little dog barked as noisily as the big one.

REFERENCE
(Situational) (Textual)
{EXO}{PHORA} { ENDO}{PHORA}
IN(SIDE)
OUT(SIDE)
{ANA}{PHORA} {CATA}{PHORA }
Endophora vs exophora
Endophora: referring to something inside the text
E.g. Wash and core six cooking apples. Put them into
a fireproof dish.
An example of an endophoric reference when them

referred back to apples.
them, therefore, signals to the reader that he or she

needs to look back in the text to find its meaning.
Endophora
Anaphora Cataphora
to preceding text to following text
Anaphoric reference
In the film, a man and a woman were trying to wash a cat.
The man was holding the cat while the woman poured water
on it. He said something to her and they started laughing.
a man, a woman, a cat → initial references
the man, the woman, the cat, it, he, her, they
→ the second or subsequent references.
In technical term,
the first/ initial references are antecedents
Ex: a man, a woman, a cat → indefinite NP
the second/subsequent references are anaphoras
Ex: the man, the woman, the cat, it, he, her, they → definite
noun phrases, pronouns
Anaphoric reference
Anaphoric reference can change
Peel and slice six potatoes
Put them in cold water
the anaphoric pronoun them
not → six potatoes
but→ six peeled and sliced potatoes.
Zero anaphora/ ellipsis
Peel an onion and slice it. Drop the slices into
hot oil. Cook for 3 minutes
In “Cook (?) for 3 minutes”, no linguistic

expression is referent, it is called zero anaphora
or ellipsis.
The use of zero anaphora to maintain reference

creates an expectation that the listeners are
able to infer what/ who the speaker intends to
Associative anaphora/ bridging
• Instead of referring back to an entity, we refer
back to something associated with it.
Ex: I walked into a room. The windows looked
out to the bay.
Associative
antecedent
anaphora
Anaphoric reference
The key to making sense of reference is

that pragmatic process whereby the
speakers select linguistic expressions
with the intention of identifying certain
entities and with the assumption that
listeners will collaborate and interpret
those expressions as the speakers
intended.
Cataphoric reference
E.g: I turned the corner and almost stepped on it.

There was a large snake in the middle of the path.
In this case, we refer forward, instead of

backward.
This case is called cataphoric reference.

Referring expressions can be
pronouns or definite noun phrases
Ex: He walked into his room and

was frightened by the woman. She
is his mother.
Exophora: referring to something outside the text
E.g. For he's a jolly good fellow. And so say all of us.
As readers outside of this environment, we are unfamiliar with

who the he is that is being referred to
But, most likely, the people involved are aware of the he.
When the meaning is not explicit from the text itself, but is
obvious to those in a particular situation, this is called exophoric
reference.
Characteristics of reference
Reference as an action.
Reference is tied to the speaker’s goals

and beliefs in the use of language.
Reference needn’t be precise.

Reference as an action
• The speaker intend the • The listener needs to:
listener to be able to  understand that the
pick out a reference in a speaker intend him to
particular context. identify an entity
 identify that entity
Eg: Can you see the according to the
tall man in the red referring expression the
shirt? I don’t like speaker produced
him.
Speaker’s goals and belief
Reference components:
Speaker’s belief
Speaker’s goals Listener is capable of
to identify something identifying the thing due to
mutual knowledge
Speakers and listeners still manage to understand
each other in the absence of the precise
information
We often use vague expressions, or expression that

aren’t literally of the referent
Eg: Mr. Whoever knows is over there

Referential and attributive use
“It is important to recognize that not all referring expressions
have identifiable physical referents” (Yule:2010)
NPs used by a speaker who is able to identify a referent or has
one specific entity in mind
E.g. The man I live next door to has some very strange habits.
Even if the description content is wrong, they may still refer

successfully
(The listener can still manage to infer what referent is intended)

Imagine that somebody called Smith has just been murdered. Jones
has been charged with the murder and he’s on trial. He behaves
oddly. Afterwards, you tell a friend: “The man who murdered Smith is
insane”
The description suggests a referential use.
The speaker intend to refer the murder is Jones, a particular man,

regardless of whether or not he is actually responsible for the death
of Smith
Attributive use
NPs used by a speaker who assumes the existence

of a referent that satisfies some descriptive content
Meaning: “Whoever/ Whatever fits the description”
An “invitation” to the listener to assume that such a

referent exists (even it can’t be identified)
Imagine that somebody called Smith has just been murdered. You
come across the murdered body of Smith. You’ve no idea who did it.
You turn to your friend and say: “The man who murdered Smith is
insane”
The description is not a particular person; “The man who murdered

Smith” isn’t really referring to someone identifiable
The description has an “Attributive use”, equivalent to Whoever

murdered Smith
Remember: the descriptive properities of speaker decide
whether a NP is a referential use or attributive use.
E.g. He wants to marry a woman with a lot of money
Referential use: when speaker has a person in mind without

having a name
Attributive use: when speaker want to infer any woman who
has a lot of money
the word “a” could be replaced by “any”

Inferences
• Definitions
1. Definition of inference
Inference is connecting prior knowledge to text based information to
create meaning beyond what is directly stated.
The role of inference in communication is to allow the listener to

identify correctly which particular entity the speaker is referring to.
We can even use vague expressions relying on the listener’s ability to

infer what is the referent that we have in mind.
Eg: I just rented a house. The kitchen is really big

Listeners make inferences about what is said in order to arrive at an
interpretation of the speaker’s intended meaning.
The choice of one type of referring expression rather than another

seems to be based on what the speaker assumes the listener already
knows.
Inference: as there is no direct relationship between entities and words,

the listener's task is to infer correctly which entity the speaker intends
to identify by using a particular referring expression.
The role of co-text
The ability to identify intended referents does not just
depend on the understanding of the referring expression,
but is aided by the co-text and context, accompanying it.
co-text: linguistic part of the environment in which a

referring expression is used (văn cảnh)
context: physical environment and (speech) conventions

(cảnh huống)
Examples of co-text
The heart-attack mustn't be moved

(hospital)
Your ten-thirty just cancelled
(dentist)
A couple of rooms have complained
about the heat (hotel)
Types of inferences
Coreference: A referential relation between

expressions where they both refer to the
same entity
Bridging inferences: Links the nominals to

the preceding sentences and creates
coherence based on the basic of
background knowledge
Coreference
Repetition of nominal
E.g: I saw a beggar. The beggar looked curiously at me.
An independent nominal used as an epithet
E.g: Ann is a daughter of Mary. I met this beautiful girl in the bus yesterday.
An anaphoric pronoun
E.g: Susan dropped the plate. It shattered loudly.

Bridging inferences
John owned a house. The plumbing was blocked.
John owned a house. The ceilings were sagging.
John owned a house. The valuation was too low.
The speaker assumes that referent is accessible

to the listener
Exercise
Conversation 1:
A: Can I borrow your Shakespeare?
B: Yeah, it’s over there on the table
Conversation 2:
A: Where’s the cheese sandwich sitting?
B: He’s over there by the window.
Shakespeare takes up the whole bottom shelf.
We are going to see Shakepeare in London
I hate Shakepeare at school.
=> things the writer produced

References
• Cruse, A. 2002. Meaning in Language: An introduction to Semantics and
Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Diệp Quang Ban. (2004), Ngữ pháp tiếng Việt, Nxb Giáo dục, Hà Nội.
• Hanks, W. (2009) Fieldwork on deixis. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1: 10-24.
• Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Newman, P. and Ratliff, M. (2001). Linguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
• Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language
Teaching and Applied Linguistics (4th ed.). London: Longman (Pearson
Education).
• Yule, G. 1996. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Yule, G. 2010. The study of language (4th). New York: Cambridge
University Press

Pragmatic

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pragmatic

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Pragmatic

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REFERENCES AND

Referring expression & its types

Reasons to use reference in Language

Referential and attribute use of referring expressions

Reference: an act in which

Personal (communication goal of referent)

Demonstrative (proximity of referent)

Comparative ( similarity to preceding referent)

Personal pronouns (e.g., I, he, she)

Possesive pronouns (e.g., mine, hers, his)

Possesive determiners (e.g., my, your, her)

English is considered an international language. It is a spoken

the speaker identifies the referent by locating it on a scale of proximity.

this, these and here imply proximity to the speaker

that, those and there imply distance from the speaker.

Like personals, the demonstratives regularly refer exophorically to

E.g. How do you like a cruise in that yacht?

adjectives as same, identical, equal

adjectives in a comparative degree such as bigger, faster

adverbs such as identically, likewise, so, such

E.g. She has a similarly furnished room to mine.

The little dog barked as noisily as the big one.

Endophora: referring to something inside the text

An example of an endophoric reference when them

them, therefore, signals to the reader that he or she

a man, a woman, a cat → initial references

the first/ initial references are antecedents

Ex: a man, a woman, a cat → indefinite NP

the second/subsequent references are anaphoras

In “Cook (?) for 3 minutes”, no linguistic

The use of zero anaphora to maintain reference

The key to making sense of reference is

E.g: I turned the corner and almost stepped on it.

In this case, we refer forward, instead of

This case is called cataphoric reference.

Ex: He walked into his room and

As readers outside of this environment, we are unfamiliar with

Reference is tied to the speaker’s goals

Reference needn’t be precise.

We often use vague expressions, or expression that

Eg: Mr. Whoever knows is over there

Even if the description content is wrong, they may still refer

(The listener can still manage to infer what referent is intended)

The description suggests a referential use.

The speaker intend to refer the murder is Jones, a particular man,

NPs used by a speaker who assumes the existence

Meaning: “Whoever/ Whatever fits the description”

An “invitation” to the listener to assume that such a

The description is not a particular person; “The man who murdered

The description has an “Attributive use”, equivalent to Whoever

E.g. He wants to marry a woman with a lot of money

Referential use: when speaker has a person in mind without

the word “a” could be replaced by “any”

The role of inference in communication is to allow the listener to

We can even use vague expressions relying on the listener’s ability to

Eg: I just rented a house. The kitchen is really big

The choice of one type of referring expression rather than another

Inference: as there is no direct relationship between entities and words,

co-text: linguistic part of the environment in which a