Multinational Capital Budgeting: South-Western/Thomson Learning © 2003
Multinational Capital Budgeting: South-Western/Thomson Learning © 2003
Multinational Capital Budgeting: South-Western/Thomson Learning © 2003
A14 - 2
Subsidiary versus Parent
Perspective
• Should the capital budgeting for a multi-
national project be conducted from the
viewpoint of the subsidiary that will
administer the project, or the parent that will
provide most of the financing?
• The results may vary with the perspective
taken because the net after-tax cash inflows
to the parent can differ substantially from
those to the subsidiary.
A14 - 3
Subsidiary versus Parent
Perspective
The difference in cash inflows is due to :
• Tax differentials
¤ What is the tax rate on remitted funds?
• Regulations that restrict remittances
• Excessive remittances
¤ The parent may charge its subsidiary very
high administrative fees.
• Exchange rate movements
A14 - 4
Subsidiary versus Parent
Perspective
• A parent’s perspective is appropriate
when evaluating a project, since any
project that can create a positive net
present value for the parent should
enhance the firm’s value.
• However, one exception to this rule may
occur when the foreign subsidiary is not
wholly owned by the parent.
A14 - 5
Input for Multinational
Capital Budgeting
The following forecasts are usually required:
1.Initial investment
2.Consumer demand
3.Product price
4.Variable cost
5.Fixed cost
6.Project lifetime
7.Salvage (liquidation) value
A14 - 6
Input for Multinational
Capital Budgeting
The following forecasts are usually required:
8.Fund-transfer restrictions
9.Tax laws
10.Exchange rates
11.Required rate of return
A14 - 7
Multinational
Capital Budgeting
• Capital budgeting is necessary for all
long-term projects that deserve
consideration.
• One common method of performing the
analysis is to estimate the cash flows and
salvage value to be received by the parent,
and compute the net present value (NPV)
of the project.
A14 - 8
Multinational
Capital Budgeting
• NPV = – initial outlay
n
+ cash flow in period
t
t
t =1 (1 + k )
+
salvage value
(1 + k )n
k = the required rate of return on the project
n = project lifetime in terms of periods
• If NPV > 0, the project can be accepted.
A14 - 9
Capital Budgeting Analysis
Period t
1.Demand (1)
2.Price per unit (2)
3.Total revenue (1)(2)=(3)
4.Variable cost per unit (4)
5.Total variable cost (1)(4)=(5)
6.Annual lease expense (6)
7.Other fixed periodic expenses (7)
8.Noncash expense (depreciation) (8)
9.Total expenses (5)+(6)+(7)+(8)=(9)
10. Before-tax earnings of subsidiary(3)–(9)=(10)
11. Host government taxtax
rate(10)=(11)
12. After-tax earnings of subsidiary(10)–
(11)=(12)
A14 - 10
Capital Budgeting Analysis
Period t
13. Net cash flow to subsidiary (12)+(8)=(13)
14. Remittance to parent(14)
15. Tax on remitted fundstax
rate(14)=(15)
16. Remittance after withheld tax(14)–(15)=(16)
17. Salvage value(17)
18. Exchange rate(18)
19. Cash flow to parent
(16)(18)+(17)(18)=(19)
20. Investment by parent(20)
21. Net cash flow to parent (19)–(20)=(21)
22. PV of net cash flow to parent (1+k) - t(21)=(22)
23. Cumulative NPVPVs=(23)
A14 - 11
Factors to Consider in
Multinational Capital Budgeting
Exchange rate fluctuations. Different
scenarios should be considered together
with their probability of occurrence.
Inflation. Although price/cost forecasting
implicitly considers inflation, inflation can
be quite volatile from year to year for
some countries.
A14 - 12
Factors to Consider in
Multinational Capital Budgeting
Financing arrangement. Financing costs
are usually captured by the discount rate.
However, many foreign projects are
partially financed by foreign subsidiaries.
Blocked funds. Some countries may
require that the earnings be reinvested
locally for a certain period of time before
they can be remitted to the parent.
A14 - 13
Factors to Consider in
Multinational Capital Budgeting
Uncertain salvage value. The salvage value
typically has a significant impact on the
project’s NPV, and the MNC may want to
compute the break-even salvage value.
Impact of project on prevailing cash flows.
The new investment may compete with the
existing business for the same customers.
Host government incentives. These should
also be considered in the analysis.
A14 - 14
Adjusting Project Assessment
for Risk
• If an MNC is unsure of the cash flows of a
proposed project, it needs to adjust its
assessment for this risk.
• One method is to use a risk-adjusted discount
rate. The greater the uncertainty, the larger
the discount rate that is applied.
• Many computer software packages are also
available to perform sensitivity analysis and
simulation.
A14 - 15
Impact of Multinational Capital Budgeting
on an MNC’s Value
Multinational Capital Budgeting
Decisions
m
n
E CFj , t E ER j , t
j 1
Value =
t =1 1 k t
A14 - 17
Chapter Review
A14 - 18
Chapter Review
A14 - 19