Chapter 5 Supply Contracts
Chapter 5 Supply Contracts
Chapter 5 Supply Contracts
SUPPLY CONTRACTS
Example
500
Þ Retailer’s optimal
450
400
policy is to order
12,000 units ~
Profit (in thousands)
350
300 gain avg profit of
250 $470,700
200
150
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Þ Manufacturer’s
16000
2.1. Buy – back contracts: The seller agrees to buy back unsold
goods from the buyer for some agree – upon price higher than the
salvage value.
Þ Give the buyer incentive to order more units => decrease in the
likelihood of out – of – stock.
Þ The seller can increase their profit since order quantity increases.
2. Types of supply contract for strategic
components.
w = $80 p = $125
Manufacturer Retailer s = $20 End user
b = $55
Retailer’s marginal profit = Manufacturer’s marginal profit = $45
Retailer’s marginal loss = $80 - $55 = $25
2.1. Buy – back contracts
F = $100,000
c = $35
w = $60 p = $125
Manufacturer Retailer s = $20 End user
15% of revenue
500
Þ Retailer’s
400
optimal policy is
Profit 300
to order 14,000
200
units ~ gain avg
100
profit of
0
$504,325
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000
Þ Manufacturer’s
16000
profit = $481,375
Quantity
R's profit M's profit
• The SC total profit = $985,700.
• The reduction in the wholesale price coupled with revenue sharing leads to
increased profit for both parties.
2.2. Revenue – sharing contracts
Limitations
F = $100,000
c = $35
w = $80 p = $125
Manufacturer Retailer End user
s = $80 for unsold products
with condition # returns <= a fixed number
2. Types of supply contract for strategic
components.
2.4. Sales Rebate contracts
Provide a direct incentive to the retailer to increase sales by means of
rebate paid by the supplier for any item sold above a certain quantity
What if an unbiased decision maker is allowed to identify the best strategy for
the entire supply chain?
Same
organizatio
n
Buyer
Maximize supply chain profit
2. Types of supply contract for strategic
components.
Example
F = $100,000
c = $35
w = $80 p = $125
Supply chain marginal profit = $125 - $35 = $90 > Supply chain marginal loss = $35 -
$20 = $15
Þ The supply chain will produce more than average demand
Þ Both parties are in the same company big company
2. Types of supply contract for strategic
components.
2.5. Global Optimization for (order to stock)
Example
1200
Þ The optimal
Profit (in thousands)
1000
production
800
quantity is
600
16,000 units ~
400 gain expected
200 supply chain
0
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
profit of
$1,014,500
Quantity
2. Types of supply contract for strategic
components.
Order q’ty?
MTO
MTS
Supplier
Buyer
Prod. Q’ty?
MTS supply chains
F = $100,000
c = $55
s = $20
w = $80 p = $125
Manufacturer Distributor Retailer
Contracts for MTS supply chains.
Building more
capacity than Limit its production
sales quantity
Manufacturer
200
180 Þ Manufacturer’s
160
140 optimal policy is
Profit (in thousand) 120
100
to produce
80 12,000 units ~
60
40 gain avg profit of
20
0
$143,900
Þ Distributor’s
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
profit = $510,300
Production quantity
¨ The buyer agrees to pay some agreed – upon price for any
unit produced by manufacturer but not purchased by the
distributor.
Þ The manufacturer have incentive to produce more units since
the risk associated with unused capacity is decreased.
Þ The distributor’s risk increases.
PAY – BACK CONTRACTS
Example
F = $100,000
c = $55
w = $80 p = $125
s = $20 Retailer
Manufacturer Distributor
500 increases to
400
300 $525,420
200
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000
Order quantity
F = $100,000
c = $55
w = $62 p = $125
s = $20 Retailer
Manufacturer Distributor
400
300 $523,320
200
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Production quantity
w = $80 p = $125
s = $20
Manufacturer Distributor Retailer
Þ There is always a positive probability that the forecast is higher than realized
demand
Þ Whether we can design contracts that achieve credible information sharing or not?
4. Contracts with asymmetric information
=> Use the marketplace to find new suppliers and force competition
to reduce product price.
5. Contracts for nonstrategic
components