Audit Planning
Audit Planning
Audit Planning
Learning Objectives
• To identify the processes in shariah audit planning
• To determine the materiality indicator in shariah audit
practice
• To develop understanding on the internal control for
shariah compliance
• To introduce shariah audit program during the audit
process
Introduction
• Audit processes are the steps that involve in performing
shariah audit function which is done by the external auditors
• External shariah audit is an optional basis – this can be adopted
by IFIs
• The audit process can be broke down into the following audit
phases:
Consider
Establish Issue the
internal Perform
Preliminar Materiality Plan the shariah
control for audit
y Review and Assess Audit audit
shariah procedure
Risks report
compliance
Terms of Engagement
• The terms of engagement in conducting audit must done at the
planning stage.
• To allow the auditor to set the scope and objectives of the
relationship between the auditor and the IFIs.
• Engagement letter should address:
• The responsibilities: Scope, Independence, Deliverables
• Authority: right of access to information
• Accountability: Auditees’s rights, agreed completion date of the
auditor
• AAOIFI No 3. on terms of audit engagement – requires auditor
and the client to agree on the terms of the engagement
Preliminary Review
• Allows the auditor to gather organizational information as a
basis for creating their audit plan
• Identify the IFI’s strategy and responsibilities for managing
and controlling the institutions
• An auditor can provide an in depth overview of the IFI’s
operations system to establish which applications are
financially significant
• Preliminary review: the auditors will perform analytical review
to identify areas that need to be focused and mitigated
Analytical Review
• Analytical review: analysis of significant ratios and trends
including the resulting investigation of fluctuations and
variances
• 5 Types of Analytical Review:
• Compare client data and industry data
• Compare client data with similar prior period data
• Compare client data with client determined expected results
(budgets)
• Compare client data with auditor determined expected results
• Compare client data with expected results, using non-financial
data
Shariah Audit Checklist
• Essential part of the planning stage
• Checklist:
Product design and structure Product documentation Product operations
• Suitable for the design of the • The product manual is in place • Product concept – well
product in the IFIs understood by the internal
• Shariah compliant • Product manual and legal parties especially the front
• Maqasid shariah of the product documentation – shariah lines
and necessary approvals compliant • Execution and disbursement of
• Endorsement – obtained for the products – follow shariah
the design and structure of the contract
product • Payment and repayment –
clear
• Product transaction recording
procedures – meet the
standards of IFRS
• Monitoring and recovery
policies and procedures – clear
and overall operations must be
shariah compliant
Materiality and risk assessment
in shariah audit practice
• Materiality and Assessment of the IFI’s business risks are
made to set the scope of the audit
• Materiality is
“Information is material if its omission or misstatement could
influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
the financial statements. Materiality depends on the size of the
item or error judge in the particular circumstances of its
omission or misstatement. Thus, materiality provides a threshold
or cut- off point rather than being a primary qualitative
characteristic which information must have if it is to be useful”
Materiality in Shariah Audit
• The level of compliance needed for a certain transaction to be
considered as valid according to shariah
• Level needed to be adopted by internal auditors when they are
planning the audit. This includes:
• The audit of financial statements
• Compliance audit of the organizational:
• Structure
• People
• Process
• Information technology application system
• The review of adequacy of the shariah governance process
Auditor’s determination of
materiality
• A matter of professional judgment and is affected by the auditor’s
perception of the information needs of users of the financial
statements
• It is reasonable for the internal shariah auditor to assume that users:
• Have a reasonable knowledge of fiqh muamalat activities and
transactions and a willingness to study the information in the contracts
with reasonable diligence
• Understand that the contracts are prepared, presented and audited to
levels of materiality
• Recognized the uncertainties inherent in the measurement of amounts
based on the use of estimates, judgment and the consideration of future
events and
• Make reasonable economic decisions on the basis of the information in
the transactions of IFIs
Designing Shariah Audit Plan
• Internal shariah auditor should establish an acceptable
materiality level so as to detect quantitatively material
misstatements
• Both the amount (quantity) and nature (quality) of
misstatements need to be considered
• Qualitative misstatements would be the inadequate or improper
description of a product and services when it is likely that a
user of the information would be misled by the description
• Failure to disclose that breach of regulatory requirements when
it is likely that the consequent imposition of regulatory
restrictions will significantly impair operating capability
The auditor’s considerations
• Need to consider the possibility of misstatements of relatively
small amounts that cumulatively could have a material effect
on the structure of the issued product in the IFIs
• In terms of the organisation’s:
• Structure
• People
• Process
• Information technology application system
The relationship between
materiality and audit risk
• Internal shariah audit need to consider what would make the
information materially misstated
• Shariah audit need to decide as what items to examine and
whether to use sampling and substantive analytical procedures
• Selection of items – to reduce the shariah risk to an acceptably
low level
• The higher the materiality level, the lower the shariah risk and
vice versa
Materiality level in shariah audit
planning
• Materiality is quantified and considered twice during the
shariah audit process
• During the planning phase of the audit (planning materiality)
• During the concluding phase of the audit (final materiality)
• The SA may also audit non-financial items such as physical
access controls, logical access controls and systems for
personnel management, manufacturing control, design, quality
control and password generation
• The SA – identify relevant control objectives and determine,
based on materiality which controls should be examined.
• Internal control objectives are placed by management and
identifies what the management strives to achieve through their
internal controls
Materiality Indicators
• Needed to set certain level of materiality for the purpose of
determining whether a contract is valid, voidable or void is to be used
by the auditors when they are examining the documents in relation to
a transaction
• The degree of materiality measurement - used to ascertain whether
any activity or operation is indeed compliant to shariah
• Must be referred to the requirement of shariah on the contracts or
transactions
• Auditing – Issue of materiality arises!
• Internal audit has to set a minimum threshold of shariah compliance in
order to finally decide whether the activities and operations comply with
the shariah guidelines
• Some actions give rise to different implications to the contract
• Essential elements of a contract are the items that have to be strictly
observed
Materiality Indicator
• The materiality level to be used when assessing the risk of
shariah non-compliance can be divided into three main areas:
Adequate
Avoid shariah Shariah
Qualified
conflict of policies Audit-
HR
Interest and Internal
procedures
IFIs adoption of five major components of
Internal Control System
• A company’s system of internal control system commonly
comprises of five main components
Control environments
Control Procedures
Test of Substantive
Control Test
Internal
Operational Analytical Test of
control
Audit Procedure Transactions
system
Test of
Balance
In order to perform ST, the auditor needs to perform audit sampling to avoid testing
the whole population of the IFIs. To ensure the resources available in performing
shariah audit are being allocated efficiently and effectively
Audit Sampling
• Sampling is important to determine the sufficiency evidence from
the total number of target population
• One of the steps in audit process on the adequacy to warrant
generalization of the findings to the target population
• Audit sampling – the data gathered will be more accurate and
time saving
• The auditor should consider the audit objectives, the nature of the
population and the sampling and selection methods when
designing the size and structure of an audit sampling
• SA needs to consider the previous audit findings in determining
the sample size
• If previously, IFIs are highly exposed to Shariah non-compliance
issues, the auditor needs to increase the sample size in order to reduce
the risk faced by the auditor
Selecting the sample
• The auditor should select the sample items in such a way that
they are representative of the population
Sampling Methods
Random sampling
Statistical Sampling
Methods
Systematic
Sampling
Judgmental
Sampling
Non-Statistical
Sampling Methods
Haphazard
Sampling
Selecting the sample
• The selection of the sample size is affected by the level of
sampling risk that the auditor is willing to accept
• Sampling risk- the risk that the auditor’s conclusion may be
different from the conclusion that would be reached if the
entire population were subjected to the same audit procedure
• The two types of sampling risk:
• The risks of incorrect acceptance
• The risk of incorrect rejection
Evaluation and Documentation
of Samples
• The effect of not being able to apply a planned procedure to a
sample item in identifying shariah non-compliance risks
• A projection of the sample results to the population being
tested, then comparing those results with the planned amounts
• Appropriate consideration to the assessed level of sampling
risk must be performed
• Auditor needs to adequately consider qualitative aspects of
misstatements, such as the nature and cause of the
misstatements and the possible relationship of the
misstatements to other phases of the audit
Evaluation and Documentation
of Samples
The auditor must document in their work papers
the sampling objectives and the sampling process
used.