Christopher Moehrl filed a class action lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Realogy, RE/MAX, and HomeServices of America alleging that the "Buyer Broker Commission Rule" requiring blanket, non-negotiable offers to compensate buyer brokers when listing properties on MLSs violates antitrust laws. The lawsuit seeks damages on behalf of home sellers who paid broker commissions in the last four years when listing homes on certain large MLSs. While the MLSs themselves are not currently defendants, they could be found liable as co-conspirators for adopting the alleged anticompetitive rule.
Christopher Moehrl filed a class action lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Realogy, RE/MAX, and HomeServices of America alleging that the "Buyer Broker Commission Rule" requiring blanket, non-negotiable offers to compensate buyer brokers when listing properties on MLSs violates antitrust laws. The lawsuit seeks damages on behalf of home sellers who paid broker commissions in the last four years when listing homes on certain large MLSs. While the MLSs themselves are not currently defendants, they could be found liable as co-conspirators for adopting the alleged anticompetitive rule.
Christopher Moehrl filed a class action lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Realogy, RE/MAX, and HomeServices of America alleging that the "Buyer Broker Commission Rule" requiring blanket, non-negotiable offers to compensate buyer brokers when listing properties on MLSs violates antitrust laws. The lawsuit seeks damages on behalf of home sellers who paid broker commissions in the last four years when listing homes on certain large MLSs. While the MLSs themselves are not currently defendants, they could be found liable as co-conspirators for adopting the alleged anticompetitive rule.
Christopher Moehrl filed a class action lawsuit against the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Realogy, RE/MAX, and HomeServices of America alleging that the "Buyer Broker Commission Rule" requiring blanket, non-negotiable offers to compensate buyer brokers when listing properties on MLSs violates antitrust laws. The lawsuit seeks damages on behalf of home sellers who paid broker commissions in the last four years when listing homes on certain large MLSs. While the MLSs themselves are not currently defendants, they could be found liable as co-conspirators for adopting the alleged anticompetitive rule.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10
Lawsuits
Lawsuits – Class Action
March 6, 2019 - Six law firms representing
Shorewood, Minnesota resident Christopher Moehrl filed a complaint related to the sale of his home on November 15, 2017, listed in NorthstarMLS. Lawsuits Moehrl entered into a listing agreement with his seller’s broker (a RE/MAX franchise) that specified he would compensate the listing broker for helping to market and sell the home for a commission of 6 percent of the purchase price. The listing agreement further specified that the listing broker would keep 3.3 percent of the commission and share 2.7 percent with a buyer’s brokerage (which ended up being a Keller Williams Realty franchise.) Lawsuits The original complaint alleged that the National Association of Realtors (NAR), Realogy, RE/MAX, HomeServices of America and Keller Williams Realty are violating Section 1 of the US Sherman Antitrust Act, by requiring a “blanket, nonnegotiable offer of buyer broker compensation” when listing a property on the MLS, which the suit calls the “Buyer Broker Commission Rule.” Lawsuits The lawsuit, filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in Chicago, seeks class-action status on behalf of homesellers who paid a broker commission in the last four years (since March 6, 2015) in connection with the sale and listing of their home in one of 20 Realtor association-owned MLSs. Many of the listed MLSs are among the country’s largest, including Bright MLS in the Mid-Atlantic region and Stellar MLS in mid- Florida. Lawsuits The MLSs are not listed as defendants in the lawsuit, but as co-conspirators because they allegedly adopt, comply with and implement what the suit calls the “Buyer Broker Commission Rule”. Although they are not currently defendants, any one of them could be responsible for paying damages and found as defendants at a later point. Lawsuits In April 2019, another nearly identical complaint from homeseller Sawbill Strategic Inc, also in the US District Court’s Northern District of Illinois.
On June 16, 2019, the Moerhl and Sawbill
complaints merged and added six additional homeseller plaintiffs in a consolidated and amended suit. Lawsuits The same month a third homeseller, Sitzer and Winger, filed another suit, in the Western District of Missouri, obviously copied from the Illinois complaints.
(class definition covers sellers who listed
homes in 4 Mo. MLSs) Lawsuits September 6, 2019 Redfin begins displaying all buyer-broker commissions on all its Seattle listings on its website.
October 1, 2019 Redfin, Windermere Real Estate and Coldwell Banker Bain begin displaying buyer-broker commissions on all Northwest MLS listings on their websites.
William H. Michelson, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Citicorp National Services, Inc., F/k/a/ Citicorp Acceptance Company, Inc, 138 F.3d 508, 3rd Cir. (1998)
Patricia Boone, Patricia Boone Mandolyn Boyd Mary Jordan Mary McBride Arthaway McCullough Constance McFarland Eugene Paine Bernice Paine Mary Spratt Peggy Washington v. Citigroup, Inc. Citifinancial Inc. Associates First Capital Corporation Associates Corporation of North America Paul Spears D. Lavender Michelle Easter John Does 1-50 Citifinancial Corporation, 416 F.3d 382, 1st Cir. (2005)