Six Sigma Optimization Project Documentation Template
Six Sigma Optimization Project Documentation Template
Six Sigma Optimization Project Documentation Template
Process Optimization
Process selected
Plant
Team Members
Date of Start
Slide number: 1
Process Optimization
P
Planning
PLANNING
A
ANALYSE
Analyse
I
Improve
IMPROVE
C
Control
CONTROL
Slide number: 2
Process Optimization
Phase – 1- Planning
No. Parameter
1 Process selected
Slide number: 3
Process Optimization
Phase – 1- Planning
Project Planning
Month Month Month
Phase
W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
Plan
Analyze
Improve
Control
Improve
Control
Slide number: 4
Process Optimization
Phase – 1- Planning
Response Y = Diameter
Specification : 9.00 mm Minimum.
Slide number: 5
Process Optimization
Phase – 1- Planning
A–
B–
C–
D–
E–
F–
G–
H–
I–
Slide number: 6
Process Optimization
Phase – 1 – Planning
C
D
Slide number: 7
Process Optimization
P
Planning
PLANNING
A
ANALYSE
Analyze
I
Improve
IMPROVE
C
Control
CONTROL
Slide number: 8
Process Optimization
Phase – 2 – Analyze
Step -1
3rd Run
Median
Range
D ( Difference Between Two
Medians )
d = Average of Two Ranges
D/d
Slide number: 9
Process Optimization
Phase – 2 – Analyze
Step -1
Conclusion:
Slide number: 10
Process Optimization
Phase – 2 – Analyze
Step -1
Median(+)
Median(-)
Average of Medians
d
1.45*d
1.45*d (after rounding off to the same
decimal place as data. Always round
off to higher number)
UDL(+) = Median(+) + 1.45*d
LDL(+) = Median(+) – 1.45*d
UDL(-) = Median(-) + 1.45*d
LDL(-) = Median(-) – 1.45*d
Slide number: 11
Process Optimization
Phase – 2 – Analyze
Step -2 – Method #1 data collection
Is the
contribution
- Setting + Setting Average UDL (+) LDL(+) UDL (-) LDL(-) Conclusion zero
1st run
2nd run
3rd run
Slide number: 12
Process Optimization
Phase – 2 – Analyze
Step -2 – Method #1 data collection
Graph
9.9
9.7
9.5
- S e t t ing
9.3 +
S e t t ing
Ave r a ge
9.1
UDL (+)
8.9 LDL( +)
LDL( -)
8.5
1st run 2nd run 3rd run
Slide number: 13
Process Optimization
Phase – 2 – Analyze
Step -3 – Factorial analysis
Factorial table
Response Is there any parameter
- - - held at a specific setting
because its contribution
+ - -
is not zero Yes/No
- + -
If yes, what are the
+ + - parameters and what are
- - + the settings
+ - + -
- + + -
+ + +
-
-
Slide number: 14
Process Optimization
Response
- - -
+ - -
- + -
+ + -
- - +
+ - +
- + +
+ + +
Slide number: 15
Process Optimization
Slide number: 16
Process Optimization
Interactions plot
Slide number: 17
Process Optimization
Slide number: 18
Process Optimization
Slide number: 19
Process Optimization
Upper boundary of Y
Lower boundary of Y
Nominal value of Y
Slide number: 20
Process Optimization
Slide number: 21
Process Optimization
Slide number: 22
Process Optimization
P
Planning
PLANNING
A
ANALYSE
Analyze
I
Improve
IMPROVE
C
Control
CONTROL
Slide number: 23
Process Optimization
Phase – 3 - Improve
Validation using B vs C
2 Better Condition
Current Condition
Slide number: 24
Process Optimization
Phase – 3 - Improve
Slide number: 25
Process Optimization
Phase – 3 - Improve
Analysis - B Vs C
4 Xb – Xc (Amount of
Improvement)
5 Sigma (B)
K = 4.2
Slide number: 26
Process Optimization
P
Planning
PLANNING
A
ANALYSE
Analyze
I
Improve
IMPROVE
C
Control
CONTROL
Slide number: 27
Process Optimization
Phase – 4 - Control
QP-WS-SP-
EMXI STRIKER ASSY DOOR 81350-33010 020 UPSETTING 10 CHOWEL-ASR-150
050(02)
WORKING CONDITION
1 0 24 9 0 10 0 0 4.0~5.0 KG/CM2
NUMBER COUNT MAX. CURR CURR - I CURR - II CURR - III COND. DEGREE HIGH AIR PRESSURE
SKETCH
History of Problem
1) UPSETTING CRACK
2) UPSETTING DAMAGE
3) COMPONENTS DAMAGE
4) COMPONENTS RUST
5) UNEVEN WELD
6) COMPONENT BURR
NOTE : INSERT TO BE CHANGED, IF BULB DIAMETER OF THE LAST COMPONENT FOUND OUT OF SPEC.
AMENDMENT HISTORY
SI NO REV NO DATE REASON
1 01 30.05.03 DOCUMENT NUMBER ADDED
Slide number: 28