Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14
STAT-304
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE II Lecture 2 Reference
Sampling: Design and Analysis (Advanced Series) 2nd Edition (2010) by
Sharon L. Lohr. Chapter 5, Page# 182-185
Singh, R. and Singh N, (1996), “Elements of Survey Sampling”, Kulwar,
Dodrecht. Chapter 11, Page # 283-313 Multistage Sampling With cluster sampling, the smaller the size of the clusters the better is. When (1) the units are distributed over a larger number of clusters and (2) instead of completely enumerating all the units in each selected clusters, only a sample of units is observed. For example, in a High School example, the students could be grouped by grade levels or classes; here grade levels are too large to serve as clusters for sampling purposes, and classes are the obvious choice. The problem with cluster sampling is that, because clusters usually comprise existing groupings that were formed for other purposes, the lowest level of clustering still often yields clusters that are too large to be used efficiently in cluster sampling. The solution to this problem is to divide the clusters into sub-clusters for sampling purposes; essentially this is what is done in multistage sampling. Two-Stage Cluster Sampling ‘The procedure of sampling , which consists in first selecting the clusters and then randomly choosing a specified number of units from each selected cluster, is known as two stage sampling
There are two desirable conditions for selecting appropriate clusters: –
Geographic proximity (Closeness) of the elements within a cluster – Cluster sizes that are convenient to handle.
Example: Consider an university student opinion poll. – If the students in
an university hold similar opinions but differ widely from university to university, the sample should contain few representatives from many different universities. – If the students in an university vary greatly, the sample should contain many representatives from each of a few universities. Cont. In two-stage cluster sampling, the sample of elements is obtained as a result of two stages of sampling.
The population elements are first grouped into disjoint
subpopulations, called primary sampling units (PSU). Then, in a first- stage sampling, a sample of PSU is drawn.
In the second-stage sampling units (SSU) may be clusters of elements,
for each PSU in the first-stage sample.
A sample of SSU is drawn (second-stage sampling) from each PSU in
the first-stage sample. When the SSU are clusters, every element in the selected SSU is surveyed. Estimator 1
(Singh, R. and Singh N, (1996), “Elements of Survey Sampling”) P#285)
Estimator 2
((Singh, R. and Singh N, (1996), “Elements of Survey Sampling”) P#288)
Estimator 3
(Solved Examples Related to all (estimators 1,2,3) from Book)
((Singh, R. and Singh N, (1996), “Elements of Survey Sampling”) P#289)
Estimator of Population Total
(Solved Examples Related to all estimator from Book)
((Singh, R. and Singh N, (1996), “Elements of Survey Sampling”) P#294)
Exercise Questions 11.4: A district is running 110 nursery schools (anganwadi) in the rural area. The total number of children in these schools, is knowns to be 8040. The Department of Foods and Nutrition of a university has undertaken a project to determine the quality of food intake by the children in these schools. For this purpose, a sample of 10 was selected using WOR equal probability sampling. From each selected school, about 5 percent of children were selected using same procedure.
(Singh, R. and Singh N, (1996), “Elements of Survey Sampling”)
Exercise Page # 308-310.) Elaborate diet records were kept for each selected child, and the average daily calorie intake was determined. The information thus collected, is presented in the following table.
Estimate unbiasedly the average daily calorie intake for the
children of all 110 schools, and also obtain the confidence interval for it. 11.7: The excessive rains have caused damage to cotton crop in a certain area consisting of 132 villages. Before deciding on the extent of relief to be given to cultivators, the administration has decided to estimate the average per hectare loss for the area. For this purpose, a sample of 10 villages was selected using without replacement SRS, and about 5 percent of cultivators from the sample villages were selected using the same sampling scheme. Per hectare loss (in '00 rupees) incurred by each selected cultivator was assessed by visiting his fields. The results are as follows: