Motivating Employees

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 17

ninth edition

STEPHEN P. ROBBINS MARY COULTER

Part
Motivating
2 Employees
What Is Motivation?
• Motivation
 Is the result of an interaction between the person and
a situation; it is not a personal trait.
 Is the process by which a person’s efforts are
energized, directed, and sustained towards attaining
a goal.
 Energy: a measure of intensity or drive.
 Direction: toward organizational goals
 Persistence: exerting effort to achieve goals.
 Motivation works best when individual needs are
compatible with organizational goals.
Early Theories of Motivation
• Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Theory
 Needs were categorized as five levels of lower- to
higher-order needs.
 Individuals must satisfy lower-order needs before they can
satisfy higher order needs.
 Satisfied needs will no longer motivate.
 Motivating a person depends on knowing at what level that
person is on the hierarchy.
 Hierarchy of needs
 Lower-order (external): physiological, safety
 Higher-order (internal): social, esteem, self-actualization
Exhibit 16–1 Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Early Theories of Motivation (cont’d)
• McGregor’s Theory X and Theory Y
 Theory X
 Assumes that workers have little ambition, dislike work, avoid
responsibility, and require close supervision.
 Theory Y
 Assumes that workers can exercise self-direction, desire
responsibility, and like to work.
 Assumption:
 Motivation is maximized by participative decision making,
interesting jobs, and good group relations.
Early Theories of Motivation (cont’d)
• Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory
 Job satisfaction and job dissatisfaction are created by
different factors.
 Hygiene factors: extrinsic (environmental) factors that
create job dissatisfaction.
 Motivators: intrinsic (psychological) factors that create job
satisfaction.
 Attempted to explain why job satisfaction does not
result in increased performance.
 The opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction, but rather
no satisfaction.
Exhibit 16–2 Herzberg’s Motivation-Hygiene Theory
Motivation and Behavior
• Reinforcement Theory
 Assumes that a desired behavior is a function of its
consequences, is externally caused, and if reinforced,
is likely to be repeated.
 Positive reinforcement is preferred for its long-term effects on
performance
 Ignoring undesired behavior is better than punishment which
may create additional dysfunctional behaviors.
Designing Motivating Jobs
• Job Design
 The way into which tasks can be combined to form
complete jobs.
 Factors influencing job design:
 Changing organizational environment/structure
 The organization’s technology
 Employees’ skill, abilities, and preferences

 Job enlargement
 Increasing the job’s scope (number and frequency of tasks)
 Job enrichment
 Increasing responsibility and autonomy (depth) in a job.
Exhibit 16–7 Guidelines for Job Redesign

Source: J.R. Hackman and J.L. Suttle (eds.). Improving Life at Work
(Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman, 1977). With permission of the authors.
Motivation and Perception
• Equity Theory
 Proposes that employees perceive what they get from
a job situation (outcomes) in relation to what they put
in (inputs) and then compare their inputs-outcomes
ratio with the inputs-outcomes ratios of relevant
others.
 If the ratios are perceived as equal then a state of equity
(fairness) exists.
 If the ratios are perceived as unequal, inequity exists and the
person feels under- or over-rewarded.
 When inequities occur, employees will attempt to do
something to rebalance the ratios (seek justice).
Motivation and Perception (cont’d)
• Equity Theory (cont’d)
 Employee responses to perceived inequities:
 Distort own or others’ ratios.
 Induce others to change their own inputs or outcomes.
 Change own inputs (increase or decrease efforts) or
outcomes (seek greater rewards).
 Choose a different comparison (referent) other (person,
systems, or self).
 Quit their job.
 Employees are concerned with both the absolute and
relative nature of organizational rewards.
Exhibit 16–8 Equity Theory
Motivation and Perception (cont’d)
• Equity Theory (cont’d)
 Distributive justice
 The perceived fairness of the amount and allocation of
rewards among individuals (i.e., who received what).
– Influences an employee’s satisfaction.
 Procedural justice
 The perceived fairness of the process use to determine the
distribution of rewards (i.e., how who received what).
– Affects an employee’s organizational commitment.
Motivation and Behavior
• Expectancy Theory (Vroom)
 States that an individual tends to act in a certain way
based on the expectation that the act will be followed
by a given outcome and on the attractiveness of that
outcome to the individual.
 Key to the theory is understanding and managing
employee goals and the linkages among and between
effort, performance and rewards.
 Effort: employee abilities and training/development
 Performance: valid appraisal systems
 Rewards (goals): understanding employee needs
Exhibit 16–9 Simplified Expectancy Model
Motivation and Behavior (cont’d)
• Expectancy Relationships
 Expectancy (effort-performance linkage)
 The perceived probability that an individual’s effort will result
in a certain level of performance.
 Instrumentality
 The perception that a particular level of performance will
result in the attaining a desired outcome (reward).
 Valence
 The attractiveness/importance of the performance reward
(outcome) to the individual.

You might also like