Human Rights
Human Rights
Human Rights
INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
SOURCES OF
INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
O Since time immemorial, states and peoples have entered into
formal relationships with each other. Over the ages, traditions
have developed on how such relationships are conducted.
O In international law there is no single legislature, nor is there a
single enforcing institution. Consequently, international law can
only be established with the consent of states and is primarily
dependent on self-enforcement by those same states.
O This consent, from which the rules of international law are
derived, may be expressed in various ways. The obvious mode is
an explicit treaty, imposing obligations on the states parties. Such
‘treaty law’ constitutes a dominant part of modern international
law.
classification of
sources of
international law
O The internationally accepted classification of sources of
international law is formulated in Article 38 of the Statute of the
International Court of Justice. These are:
O a) International conventions, whether general or particular;
O b) International custom, as evidence of general practice
accepted as law;
O c) The general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;
O d) Subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law such
as judicial decisions and teachings of the most highly qualified
publicists.
International conventions
O Customary international law plays a crucial role in international human rights law. The
Statute of the International Court of Justice refers to ‘general practice accepted as law’.
O In order to become international customary law, the ‘general practice’ needs to represent a
broad consensus in terms of content and applicability, deriving from a sense that the
practice is obligatory .
O Customary law is binding on all states (except those that may have objected to it during
its formation), whether or not they have ratified any relevant treaty.
O One of the important features of customary international law is that customary law may,
under certain circumstances, lead to universal jurisdiction or application, so that any
national court may hear extra-territorial claims brought under international law.
O Many scholars argue that some standards laid down in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (which in formal terms is only a resolution of the UNGA and as such not
legally binding) have become part of customary international law as a result of subsequent
practice; therefore they would be binding upon all states. Within the realm of human rights
law the distinction between concepts of customary law, treaty law, and general principles
of law are often unclear.
Subsidiary means for the
determination of rules of law
O According to Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of
Justice, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most qualified
publicists are ‘subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law’.
Therefore, they are not, strictly speaking, formal sources, but they are
regarded as evidence of the state of the law.
O As for the judicial decisions, Article 38 of the Statute of the International
Court is not confined to international decisions (such as the judgements of
the International Court of Justice, the Inter-American Court, the European
Court and the future African Court on human rights); decisions of national
tribunals relating to human rights are also subsidiary sources of law.
O The writings of scholars contribute to the development and analysis of
human rights law. Compared to the formal standard setting of
international organs the impact is indirect.