Human Rights

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 14

SOURCES OF

INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
SOURCES OF
INTERNATIONAL
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW
O Since time immemorial, states and peoples have entered into
formal relationships with each other. Over the ages, traditions
have developed on how such relationships are conducted.
O In international law there is no single legislature, nor is there a
single enforcing institution. Consequently, international law can
only be established with the consent of states and is primarily
dependent on self-enforcement by those same states.
O This consent, from which the rules of international law are
derived, may be expressed in various ways. The obvious mode is
an explicit treaty, imposing obligations on the states parties. Such
‘treaty law’ constitutes a dominant part of modern international
law.
classification of
sources of
international law
O The internationally accepted classification of sources of
international law is formulated in Article 38 of the Statute of the
International Court of Justice. These are:
O a) International conventions, whether general or particular;
O b) International custom, as evidence of general practice
accepted as law;
O c) The general principles of law recognized by civilized nations;
O d) Subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law such
as judicial decisions and teachings of the most highly qualified
publicists.
International conventions

O International treaties are contracts signed between states. They are


legally binding and impose mutual obligations on the states that are
party to any particular treaty (states parties). The main particularity of
human rights treaties is that they impose obligations on states about
the manner in which they treat all individuals within their jurisdiction.
O Even though the sources of international law are not hierarchical,
treaties have some degree of primacy. Nowadays, more than forty
major international conventions for the protection of human rights
have been adopted. International human rights treaties bear various
titles, including ‘covenant’, ‘convention’ and ‘protocol’; but what they
share are the explicit indication of states parties to be bound by their
terms.
Universal conventions
for the protection of
human rights
O Human rights had already found expression in the Covenant of
the League of Nations, which led, inter alia, to the creation of the
International Labor Organization.
O the UN Charter clearly speaks of ‘promoting and encouraging
respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all
without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion’ (Article
1, para. 3). The idea of promulgating an ‘international bill of
rights’ was developed immediately afterwards and led to the
adoption in 1948 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
(UDHR).
The UDHR

O adopted by a resolution of the United Nations General


Assembly (UNGA) 1948, although not a treaty, is the earliest
comprehensive human rights instrument adopted by the
international community.
The two covenants

O in 1966, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and


Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) were adopted, as well as
the First Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, which established
an individual complaints procedure. Both Covenants and the
Optional Protocol entered into force in 1976. A Second
Optional Protocol to the ICCPR, on the abolition of the death
penalty, was adopted in 1989 and entered into force in 1991.
International Bill of Human Rights

O The ‘International Bill of Human Rights’ consists of the


Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ICESCR, and
the ICCPR and its two Optional Protocols. The
International Bill of Rights is the basis for numerous
conventions and national constitutions.
O The ICESCR and the ICCPR are key international human
rights instruments. They have a common Preamble and
Article 1, in which the right to self-determination is
defined. The ICCPR primarily contains civil and political
rights. The supervisory body is the Human Rights
Committee. The ICESCR consists of a catalogue of
economic, social and cultural rights in the same vein as the
‘social’ part of the UDHR.
CONVENTIONS ELABORATING
ON CERTAIN RIGHTS, INTER
ALIA:

O The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime


of Genocide (1948).
O The Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984)
CONVENTIONS DEALING WITH CERTAIN
CATEGORIES OF PERSONS WHICH MAY
NEED SPECIAL PROTECTION, INTER ALIA

O The Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951), and


the 1967 Protocol thereto.
O The Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989).
O The International Convention on the Protection of the Rights
of All Migrant Workers and Members of Their Families
(2000).
CONVENTIONS SEEKING TO
ELIMINATE DISCRIMINATION
O UNESCO Convention against Discrimination in Education
(1960) .
O The International Convention on the Elimination of All
Forms of Racial Discrimination (1965).
O The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (1979) and its Optional
Protocol (2000).
Regional conventions for the
protection of human rights

O The Council of Europe adopted the European Convention for the


Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in 1950.
O the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and
Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment in 1987.
O The American Convention on Human Rights was adopted in
1969, under the auspices of the Organization of American States.
O the Convention to Prevent and Punish Torture (1985), the
Convention on the Forced Disappearances of Persons (1994).
O the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child
(1990).
International custom

O Customary international law plays a crucial role in international human rights law. The
Statute of the International Court of Justice refers to ‘general practice accepted as law’.
O In order to become international customary law, the ‘general practice’ needs to represent a
broad consensus in terms of content and applicability, deriving from a sense that the
practice is obligatory .
O Customary law is binding on all states (except those that may have objected to it during
its formation), whether or not they have ratified any relevant treaty.
O One of the important features of customary international law is that customary law may,
under certain circumstances, lead to universal jurisdiction or application, so that any
national court may hear extra-territorial claims brought under international law.
O Many scholars argue that some standards laid down in the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights (which in formal terms is only a resolution of the UNGA and as such not
legally binding) have become part of customary international law as a result of subsequent
practice; therefore they would be binding upon all states. Within the realm of human rights
law the distinction between concepts of customary law, treaty law, and general principles
of law are often unclear.
Subsidiary means for the
determination of rules of law
O According to Article 38 of the Statute of the International Court of
Justice, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most qualified
publicists are ‘subsidiary means for the determination of rules of law’.
Therefore, they are not, strictly speaking, formal sources, but they are
regarded as evidence of the state of the law.
O As for the judicial decisions, Article 38 of the Statute of the International
Court is not confined to international decisions (such as the judgements of
the International Court of Justice, the Inter-American Court, the European
Court and the future African Court on human rights); decisions of national
tribunals relating to human rights are also subsidiary sources of law.
O The writings of scholars contribute to the development and analysis of
human rights law. Compared to the formal standard setting of
international organs the impact is indirect.

You might also like