Group 7 (Chap 4) 11
Group 7 (Chap 4) 11
Group 7 (Chap 4) 11
OUR PRESENTATION
Course Name: Behavioral Finance Presented to
Course Code: FIN-6404 Dr. Mohammad Sogir Hossain
Department of Finance Khandoker
Chairman &Professor
Jagannath University, Dhaka.
Department of Finance
Jagannath University, Dhaka.
Presented by- Group-7
Group Members
Name ID
9
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
2. Investors Rationalize decisions prior to investment which get failed. They make delay
to unloading assets that are not generating adequate returns. In both cases Cognitive
Dissonance prevents investors from acting Rationally.
3. There are some investors who want to maintain self esteem rather than taking lessons
from past mistakes. They define their failure by calling it a "Chance" rather than poor
decision making.
10
PRACTICAL APPLICATION
Feininger's Peg Experiment
12
RESEARCH REVIEW
Professor William N. Goetzmann and Navad Peles established a theory that entitled
"Cognitive Dissonance and mutual fund investors", in which they examined that
investors are most likely to stick irrationally, with struggling with mutual funds.
The theory played a significant role in compelling investors to hold losing fund
position. The researchers theorized that people do not permit themselves to accept
new evidence that suggests it might be time to evacuate a fund, because they feel
committed on their initial decision.
The study showed that investors are affected by the disparity in value between
security's purchase price and current price.
13
RESEARCH REVIEW (cont..)
1. It can cause investors to hold losing securities position that they otherwise
would sell.
2. It can cause investors to continue to invest in a security that they already own
after it has gone down.
3. Due to cognitive dissonance, people avoid information that counters an earlier
decision, until so much counter information is released.
4. In can cause investors to believe “ It’s different this time” they purchase high-
flying securities, that have no excess returns. 14
RESEARCH REVIEW (Cont..)
The researchers final comment
The researchers illustrated, that the response documented in their study appears
widespread.
This chapter might have especially broad implications.
If cognitive dissonance is taken successfully with understanding, detecting and
countering the behavioral biases, could help numerous individual investors.
15
DIAGNOSTIC TESTING
a. You immediately head to your home office and page through the
various consumer magazines to determine whether you should
have purchased Model B.
b. You proceed with washing the car and think, “If I had it to do
all over again, I may have purchased Model Z. Even though
mine doesn't have a navigation system, I'm still pleased with
Model B.”
17
DIAGNOSTIC TESTING (cont..)
Example
c. You contemplate doing some additional research on Model Z. However, you
decide not to follow through on the idea. The car was a big, important
purchase, and you've been so happy with it—the prospect of discovering an
error in your purchase leaves you feeling uneasy. Better to just put this thought
to rest and continue to enjoy the car.
19
ADVICE
Cognitive Dissonance: Common Coping Responses
20
ADVICE
(cont..)
Cognitive Dissonance: Common Coping Responses
1. Modifying Beliefs
2. Modifying Actions
3. Modifying perceptions
of relevant action(s)
21
Conclusion
The bottom line in overcoming the negative behavioral effects of cognitive
dissonance is that clients need to immediately admit that a faulty cognition has
occurred.
Rather than adapting beliefs or actions in order to circumnavigate cognitive
dissonance, investors must address feelings of unease at their source and take an
appropriate rational action.
If you think you may have made a bad investment decision, analyze the decision; if
your fears prove correct, confront the problem head-on and rectify the situation. In
the long run, you’ll become a better investor.
22
23