6161576

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 15

MULTIPLE INPUT MULTIPLE

OUTPUT SYSTEMS (MIMO)

By MOHAMMED BERHEA
1. Introduction
MIMO Systems:
 use multiple inputs and multiple outputs from a
single channel
 are defined by Spatial Diversity and Spatial
Multiplexing
Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing

• Spatial Diversity
– Signal copies are transferred from multiple antennas
or received at more than one antenna
– redundancy is provided by employing an array of
antennas, with a minimum separation of λ/2 between
neighbouring antennas

• Spatial Multiplexing
– the system is able to carry more than one data stream
over one frequency, simultaneously
Why MIMO?
• There is always a need for increase in performance in
wireless systems
– Significant increase in spectral efficiency and data
rates
– High Quality of Service (QoS)
– Wide coverage, etc.
• Wireless channel that we are using is very unfriendly
– Suffers from Co–channel interference and signal level
fading
– It provides a limited bandwidth
– power falls off with distance
MIMO System solutions

• By using Multiple Output Multiple Input (MIMO) systems


– Diversity gain mitigates the fading and increases
coverage and improves QoS
– Multiplexing gain increases capacity and spectral
efficiency with no additional power or bandwidth
expenditure
– Array gain results in an increase in average receive
SNR.
• Spatial Diversity and Spatial Multiplexing can be
conflicting goals
Spatial Multiplexing
• MIMO channels can be decomposed into a number of R parallel
independent channels → Multiplexing Gain
– Principle: Transmit independent data signals from different antennas to
increase the throughput, capacity.

Source: An Overview of MIMO Systems in Wireless Communications


www.iet.ntnu.no/projects/beats/Documents/mimo.pdf
MEMO capacity on fading channels

• The capacity increase can be seen by comparing MEMO


systems with SISO, SIMO, and MISO systems
– SISO:capacity is given by Shannon’s classical formula:
2
C B log (1  snr h )
2

Where B is the BW and h is the fading gain


– SIMO (with M transmitting antennas), the capacity is given by [2]
m 2
C B log (1  snr   h )
2 n
n 1
– MISO (with M transmitting antennas), the capacity is given by [2]

 snr  N 2
C B log (1     h )
2  N  n 1 n
MEMO capacity on fading channels

• The capacity for MIMO systems can have the following forms
(Assuming Tx antennas = Rx antennas = N):
A) If the channel is not known at the transmitter:

 Es  2
C  N log (1    h )
2  N 2  n
 
– Where Es is the total power, σ2 is noise level of AWGN
– Hence the power is equally shared by each channel
– The capacity grows linearly with the number of antennas
B) If the channel is known at the transmitter
N  En  2 
C   log (1    h )
n1  2  2  n 
  
MEMO capacity on fading channels

• With the channel known at the transmitter, the total power allocation
the each channel will be based on watterfilling.
– Watterfilling: Strong Sub-channel, with low noise power level will be
assigned with a higher signal power.

Illustrating Watterfilling

Where σN2 = σ2 / │hn2│

Source: MIMO Systems and Transmit Diversity,


www.comm.utoronto.ca/~rsadve/Notes/DiversityTransmit.pdf
Average capacity of a MIMO Rayleigh fading
channel []
60

55

50

45

40
Average Capacity [bits/sec/Hz]

35

30

25

20

15

10

0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
SNR [dB]

N=1 M=1 N=2 M=1 N=1 M=2 N=2 M=2 N=2 M=4 N=2 M=6 N=4 M=4 N=8 M=8

Source: Space-time Diversity Codes for Fading Channels, [3]


Spatial Diversity
• Improves the signal quality and achieves a higher SNR at the
receiver-side
• Principle of diversity relies on the transmission of structured
redundancy

xi yi
MIMO Diversity and Reliability

• The performance improvement in SNR and error probability for


MIMO can be compared with SISO, SIMO, and MISO
• The detailed calculation for SNR and Pe is shown in [1]
– SISO: y hx  n
2 1
E hx 2 Pe 
SNR (h)  SNR h and SNR
En
2 1
2
– Receive Diversity (SIMO): yi hi x  ni , i 1,2, N

N 1
Pe 
SNR (h) SNR  h
2
N
and  SNR 
i 1  
 2 
MIMO Diversity and Reliability

• The values for SNR and Pe for: M


– Transmit Diversity (MISO): y  hjx j  n
j 1

M 1
Pe 
SNR (h) SNR  hj
2
and M
 SNR 
j 1 1  
 2 
– Transmit/Receive Diversity (MIMO): M
• The received signal at antenna i will be: yi  hijxj  ni
• H is the channel fading matrix j 1

SNR H
2 1
2 Pe  MN
SNR ( H ) SNR H and  SNR 
min{N , M }  1  
 2 min{N , M } 
Conclusion

• The capacity of Receive or Transmit Diversity grows logarithmically


with the number of antennas
• Capacity of MEMO increases linearly with the number of antennas
• Using Spatial Diversity:
– The SNR increases and Pe decreases when using MIMO
• Spatial Multiplexing and Spatial Diversity are conflicting objectives
References

[1] MIMO Architecture for Wireless Communication: Intel Technology Journal,


vol. 10, Issue 02, May 2006
[2] MIMO Systems and Transmit Diversity,
www.comm.utoronto.ca/~rsadve/Notes/DiversityTransmit.pdf
[3] R.A. Carrasco, Space-time Diversity Codes for fading Channel,
Staffordshire University
[4] D. Gesbert, M.Shafi, D. Shiu, P. Smith, and A. Naguib, “From Theory to
Practice: An Overview of MIMO Space–Time Coded Wireless Systems”
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 21,
NO. 3, APRIL 2003
[5] Introduction to MIMO Systems: Application Note 1MA102, Rohde & schwarz

You might also like