Convention of 1832

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7

Convention of 1832

What was the Convention of 1832?


1. The Convention of 1832, held at San Felipe de Austin, followed the
Anahuac Disturbances, the battle of Velasco, and the Turtle Bayou
Resolutions, in which many Texans pledged their support to then-
liberal Antonio López de Santa Anna.

2. Fifty-five delegates, none of whom were Tejano, represented


sixteen districts and met from October 1 through October 6, 1832.
The largely Tejano-populated San Fernando de Béxar (San Antonio)
and Victoria did not send a delegation. Delegates from La Bahía
(Goliad), who arrived after the meeting had adjourned, approved
what had been done. Stephen F. Austin was elected president of
the convention and Francis W. Johnson secretary.
Convention of 1833
What was the Convention of 1833?
1. The Convention of 1833 met at San Felipe on April 1 as a successor to the
Convention of 1832, to which San Fernando de Béxar (San Antonio) had refused
to send delegates. While Stephen F. Austin was visiting the Mexican
settlements in an effort to secure their cooperation, less patient settlers called
the new convention, which met on the day that Antonio López de Santa Anna
took power.

2. The political chief in San Antonio, Ramón Músquiz, again disapproved of the
meeting. Approximately fifty-six delegates attended, including Sam Houston, a
delegate from Nacogdoches. William H. Wharton presided, and Thomas
Hastings was secretary. The convention petitioned anew for repeal of the anti-
immigration section of the Law of April 6, 1830, asked for more adequate
Indian defense, judicial reform, and improvement in mail service, sought tariff
exemption, and passed resolutions prohibiting African slave traffic into Texas.
Convention of 1833 Pt. 2
1. Delegates also proposed to split Coahuila and Texas. Assuming that the
petition for statehood would be granted, a committee of which Houston was
chairman prepared a constitution for submission to the Mexican Congress.
This document was a model of republicanism fashioned, surprisingly, after the
Massachusetts constitution of 1780, which happened to be on hand. It
provided for trial by jury, habeas corpus, freedom of the press, and universal
suffrage

2. David G. Burnet was chosen to head a committee on preparing a memorial to


the Mexican government extoling the merits of the constitution and
organization of the state government. Juan Erasmo Seguín, Dr. James B. Miller,
and Austin were chosen to present the petitions to the government, but since
Seguín and Miller were unable to go, Austin went to Mexico alone. The
convention adjourned on April 13.
Austin’s Arrest
Austin’s Arrest
1. Stephen Fuller Austin was a reluctant revolutionary. He frequently traveled to
Mexico City to argue for the rights of the American colonists in Texas. He believed
that an Anglo-American state could succeed within the boundaries of the Mexican
nation.

2. Mexican authorities were alarmed by the growing numbers of former Americans


migrating to Texas. They were also concerned that the U.S. might try to annex the
region. The Mexican government began to limit immigration in 1830. This policy
angered many Anglo-American colonists who already had a long list of grievances
against the Mexican government.

3. Austin traveled to Mexico City to present the new constitution to the government
along with a list of other demands. President Santa Ana refused to grant Texas
separate status from Coahuila and threw Austin in prison on suspicion of arousing
a rebellion. Austin spent eight months in prison.

You might also like