The document discusses the performance of HTTP/2 compared to HTTP/1.1 across different network conditions. It summarizes results from testing 8 real websites under 16 bandwidth and latency combinations with varying packet loss rates. Overall, HTTP/2 performs better for document complete time and speed index, especially on slower connections, though results vary depending on the specific site and metrics measured.
A Day in the Life of a ClickHouse Query Webinar Slides Altinity Ltd
Why do queries run out of memory? How can I make my queries even faster? How should I size ClickHouse nodes for best cost-efficiency? The key to these questions and many others is knowing what happens inside ClickHouse when a query runs. This webinar is a gentle introduction to ClickHouse internals, focusing on topics that will help your applications run faster and more efficiently. We’ll discuss the basic flow of query execution, dig into how ClickHouse handles aggregation and joins, and show you how ClickHouse distributes processing within a single CPU as well as across many nodes in the network. After attending this webinar you’ll understand how to open up the black box and see what the parts are doing.
ClickHouse and the Magic of Materialized Views, By Robert Hodges and Altinity...Altinity Ltd
Presented at the webinar, June 26, 2019
Materialized views are a killer feature of ClickHouse that can speed up queries 20X or more. Our webinar will teach you how to use this potent tool starting with how to create materialized views and load data. We'll then walk through cookbook examples to solve practical problems like deriving aggregates that outlive base data, answering last point queries, and using AggregateFunctions to handle problems like counting unique values, which is a special ClickHouse feature. There will be time for Q&A at the end. At that point you'll be a wizard of ClickHouse materialized views and able to cast spells of your own.
Real-time, Exactly-once Data Ingestion from Kafka to ClickHouse at eBayAltinity Ltd
The document summarizes a real-time data ingestion solution from Kafka to ClickHouse using a block aggregator to ensure exactly-once message delivery. The block aggregator aggregates Kafka messages into large blocks before loading to ClickHouse. It uses Kafka metadata and ClickHouse's block duplication detection to replay messages deterministically after failures. The talk outlines the block aggregator's design for multi-DC deployments, deterministic replay protocol, runtime monitoring with a verifier, implementation experiences, and production deployment metrics.
A Practical Introduction to Handling Log Data in ClickHouse, by Robert Hodges...Altinity Ltd
This document discusses using ClickHouse to manage log data. It begins with an introduction to ClickHouse and its features. It then covers different ways to model log data in ClickHouse, including storing logs as JSON blobs or converting them to a tabular format. The document demonstrates using materialized views to ingest logs into ClickHouse tables in an efficient manner, extracting values from JSON and converting to columns. It shows how this approach allows flexible querying of log data while scaling to large volumes.
All About JSON and ClickHouse - Tips, Tricks and New Features-2022-07-26-FINA...Altinity Ltd
JSON is the king of data formats and ClickHouse has a plethora of features to handle it. This webinar covers JSON features from A to Z starting with traditional ways to load and represent JSON data in ClickHouse. Next, we’ll jump into the JSON data type: how it works, how to query data from it, and what works and doesn’t work. JSON data type is one of the most awaited features in the 2022 ClickHouse roadmap, so you won’t want to miss out. Finally, we’ll talk about Jedi master techniques like adding bloom filter indexing on JSON data.
Roko Kruze of vectorized.io describes real-time analytics using Redpanda event streams and ClickHouse data warehouse. 15 December 2021 SF Bay Area ClickHouse Meetup
HTTP/2 (or “H2” as the cool kids call it) has been ratified for months, and browsers already support or have committed to supporting the protocol. Everything we hear tells us that the new version of HTTP will provide significant performance benefits while requiring little to no change to our applications—all the problems with HTTP/1.x have seemingly been addressed; we no longer need the “hacks” that enabled us to circumvent them; and the Internet is about to be a happy place at last.
But maybe we should put the pom-poms down for a minute. Deploying HTTP/2 may not be as easy as it seems since the protocol brings with it new complications and issues. Likewise, the new features the spec introduces may not work as seamlessly as we hope. Hooman Beheshti examines HTTP/2’s core features and how they relate to real-world conditions, discussing the positives, negatives, new caveats, and practical considerations for deploying HTTP/2.
Topics include:
The single-connection model and the impact of degraded network conditions on HTTP/2 versus HTTP/1
How server push interacts (or doesn’t) with modern browser caches
What HTTP/2’s flow control mechanism means for server-to-client communication
New considerations for deploying HPACK compression
Difficulties in troubleshooting HTTP/2 communications, new tools, and new ways to use old tools
RFC 7540 was ratified over 2 years ago and, today, all major browsers, servers, and CDNs support the next generation of HTTP. Just over a year ago, at Velocity (https://www.slideshare.net/Fastly/http2-what-no-one-is-telling-you), we discussed the protocol, looked at some real world implications of its deployment and use, and what realistic expectations we should have from its use.
Now that adoption is ramped up and the protocol is being regularly used on the Internet, it's a good time to revisit the protocol and its deployment. Has it evolved? Have we learned anything? Are all the features providing the benefits we were expecting? What's next?
In this session, we'll review protocol basics and try to answer some of these questions based on real-world use of it. We'll dig into the core features like interaction with TCP, server push, priorities and dependencies, and HPACK. We'll look at these features through the lens of experience and see if good practice patterns have emerged. We'll also review available tools and discuss what protocol enhancements are in the near and not-so-near horizon.
Real-time, Exactly-once Data Ingestion from Kafka to ClickHouse at eBayAltinity Ltd
The document summarizes a real-time data ingestion solution from Kafka to ClickHouse using a block aggregator to ensure exactly-once message delivery. The block aggregator aggregates Kafka messages into large blocks before loading to ClickHouse. It uses Kafka metadata and ClickHouse's block duplication detection to replay messages deterministically after failures. The talk outlines the block aggregator's design for multi-DC deployments, deterministic replay protocol, runtime monitoring with a verifier, implementation experiences, and production deployment metrics.
A Practical Introduction to Handling Log Data in ClickHouse, by Robert Hodges...Altinity Ltd
This document discusses using ClickHouse to manage log data. It begins with an introduction to ClickHouse and its features. It then covers different ways to model log data in ClickHouse, including storing logs as JSON blobs or converting them to a tabular format. The document demonstrates using materialized views to ingest logs into ClickHouse tables in an efficient manner, extracting values from JSON and converting to columns. It shows how this approach allows flexible querying of log data while scaling to large volumes.
All About JSON and ClickHouse - Tips, Tricks and New Features-2022-07-26-FINA...Altinity Ltd
JSON is the king of data formats and ClickHouse has a plethora of features to handle it. This webinar covers JSON features from A to Z starting with traditional ways to load and represent JSON data in ClickHouse. Next, we’ll jump into the JSON data type: how it works, how to query data from it, and what works and doesn’t work. JSON data type is one of the most awaited features in the 2022 ClickHouse roadmap, so you won’t want to miss out. Finally, we’ll talk about Jedi master techniques like adding bloom filter indexing on JSON data.
Roko Kruze of vectorized.io describes real-time analytics using Redpanda event streams and ClickHouse data warehouse. 15 December 2021 SF Bay Area ClickHouse Meetup
HTTP/2 (or “H2” as the cool kids call it) has been ratified for months, and browsers already support or have committed to supporting the protocol. Everything we hear tells us that the new version of HTTP will provide significant performance benefits while requiring little to no change to our applications—all the problems with HTTP/1.x have seemingly been addressed; we no longer need the “hacks” that enabled us to circumvent them; and the Internet is about to be a happy place at last.
But maybe we should put the pom-poms down for a minute. Deploying HTTP/2 may not be as easy as it seems since the protocol brings with it new complications and issues. Likewise, the new features the spec introduces may not work as seamlessly as we hope. Hooman Beheshti examines HTTP/2’s core features and how they relate to real-world conditions, discussing the positives, negatives, new caveats, and practical considerations for deploying HTTP/2.
Topics include:
The single-connection model and the impact of degraded network conditions on HTTP/2 versus HTTP/1
How server push interacts (or doesn’t) with modern browser caches
What HTTP/2’s flow control mechanism means for server-to-client communication
New considerations for deploying HPACK compression
Difficulties in troubleshooting HTTP/2 communications, new tools, and new ways to use old tools
RFC 7540 was ratified over 2 years ago and, today, all major browsers, servers, and CDNs support the next generation of HTTP. Just over a year ago, at Velocity (https://www.slideshare.net/Fastly/http2-what-no-one-is-telling-you), we discussed the protocol, looked at some real world implications of its deployment and use, and what realistic expectations we should have from its use.
Now that adoption is ramped up and the protocol is being regularly used on the Internet, it's a good time to revisit the protocol and its deployment. Has it evolved? Have we learned anything? Are all the features providing the benefits we were expecting? What's next?
In this session, we'll review protocol basics and try to answer some of these questions based on real-world use of it. We'll dig into the core features like interaction with TCP, server push, priorities and dependencies, and HPACK. We'll look at these features through the lens of experience and see if good practice patterns have emerged. We'll also review available tools and discuss what protocol enhancements are in the near and not-so-near horizon.
The document discusses HTTP/2 and its implications for Java. It begins with an introduction to HTTP/2 and why it was created, noting limitations of HTTP/1.1 in handling modern web pages with many dependent resources. The document then covers specifics of the HTTP/2 protocol, and how it addresses issues like head-of-line blocking. It discusses how HTTP/2 is being adopted by browsers and considers impacts and integration of HTTP/2 with Java SE and Java EE technologies.
Web Performance in the Age of HTTP/2 - FEDay Conference, Guangzhou, China 19/...Holger Bartel
Web performance optimisation has been gaining ground and is slowly getting more of its deserved recognition. Now that we’ve learned to recognise this integral part of user experience and are approaching HTTP/2 as our new protocol of choice, some of our existing web performance best practices will turn into the new anti-patterns.
Talk slides from FEDay Conference in Guangzhou, China on 19/03/2016.
The document introduces HTTP/2 and discusses limitations of HTTP 1.1 including head of line blocking, TCP slow start, and latency issues. It describes key features of HTTP/2 such as multiplexing requests over a single TCP connection, header compression, and server push to reduce page load times. The presentation includes demos of HTTP/2 in Chrome dev tools and Wireshark to troubleshoot HTTP/2 connections.
Presentation given at the International PHP conference in Mainz, October 2012, dealing with a bit of history about the HTTP protocol, SPDY and the future (HTTP/2.0).
HTTP/2 aims to address issues with HTTP/1.x such as head-of-line blocking and wasted bandwidth through duplicate requests. It uses a binary format for multiplexing requests, server push, header compression, stream prioritization and flow control. Major browsers now support HTTP/2 over TLS, though server implementations are still in development. While preserving the HTTP/1.1 API, HTTP/2 provides advantages like cheaper requests and more efficient use of network resources and server capacity.
HTTP/3 is designed to improve in areas where HTTP/2 still has some shortcomings, primarily by changing the transport layer. HTTP/3 is the first major protocol to step away from TCP and instead it uses QUIC.
HTTP/3 is the designated name for the coming next version of the protocol that is currently under development within the QUIC working group in the IETF.
HTTP/3 is designed to improve in areas where HTTP/2 still has some shortcomings, primarily by changing the transport layer. HTTP/3 is the first major protocol to step away from TCP and instead it uses QUIC.
Daniel Stenberg does a presentation about HTTP/3 and QUIC. Why the new protocols are deemed necessary, how they work, how they change how things are sent over the network and what some of the coming deployment challenges will be.
This document introduces HTTP/2, describing its goals of improving on HTTP 1.1 by allowing multiple requests to be sent over a single TCP connection through request multiplexing and header compression. It outlines issues with HTTP 1.1 like head-of-line blocking and slow start that cause latency. HTTP/2 aims to address these by sending requests concurrently in interleaved frames and compressing headers. The document demonstrates these concepts and how to troubleshoot HTTP/2 connections using the Chrome network console and Wireshark.
The document discusses the HTTP request-response cycle. It provides examples of HTTP requests using the GET and POST methods, including the headers used. It also covers HTTP response status codes and the use of cookies in HTTP requests and responses.
HTTP/2 is a new version of the HTTP network protocol that improves performance and efficiency over HTTP/1.1. It uses a binary format and multiplexing to allow multiple requests and responses to be delivered over the same connection. HTTP/2 also supports server push, request prioritization, header compression and other features to reduce latency and improve page load times compared to HTTP/1.1. Major browsers and companies like Google and Twitter are implementing HTTP/2, and it is expected to become the new standard for the web.
HTTP/3 over QUIC. All is new but still the same!Daniel Stenberg
HTTP/3 is the designated name for the coming next version of the protocol that is currently under development within the QUIC working group in the IETF. HTTP/3 is designed to improve in areas where HTTP/2 still has some shortcomings, primarily by changing the transport layer. HTTP/3 is the first major protocol to step away from TCP and instead it uses QUIC.
Daniel Stenberg does a presentation about HTTP/3 and QUIC. Why the new protocols are deemed necessary, how they work, how they change how things are sent over the network and what some of the coming deployment challenges will be.
A technical description of http2, including background of HTTP what's been problematic with it and how http2 and its features improves the web.
See the "http2 explained" document with the complete transcript and more: http://daniel.haxx.se/http2/
(Updated version to slides shown on April 13th, 2016)
In this talk Sergei Koren, Production Architect at LivePerson will present HTTP/2, the official successor of HTTP 1.1, and how it would influence Web as we know it.
Sergei will talk about:
- HTTP/2 history
- The major changes - what do and don’t
- Expected changes to Web as we use it today
- Proposed checklist for implementation: how and when; from Production point of view.
The document discusses SPDY, an evolution of HTTP developed by Google since 2009 that aims to speed up web content delivery. SPDY utilizes a single TCP connection more efficiently through multiplexing and other techniques. It allows for faster page loads, often around 39-55% faster than HTTP. While SPDY adoption is growing, with support in Chrome, Firefox, and Amazon Silk, widespread implementation by servers is still limited. SPDY is expected to influence the development of HTTP 2.0.
RFC 7540 was ratified over 2 years ago and, today, all major browsers, servers, and CDNs support the next generation of HTTP. Just over a year ago, at Velocity, we discussed the protocol, looked at some real world implications of its deployment and use, and what realistic expectations we should have from its use. Now that adoption is ramped up and the protocol is being regularly used on the Internet, it's a good time to revisit the protocol and its deployment. Has it evolved? Have we learned anything? Are all the features providing the benefits we were expecting? What's next?In this session, we'll review protocol basics and try to answer some of these questions based on real-world use of it. We'll dig into the core features like interaction with TCP, server push, priorities and dependencies, and HPACK. We'll look at these features through the lens of experience and see if good practice patterns have emerged. We'll also review available tools and discuss what protocol enhancements are in the near and not-so-near horizon.
Daniel Stenberg gave a presentation on the evolution of HTTP from versions 1 to 2 to the upcoming version 3. He explained the problems with HTTP/1 and how HTTP/2 aimed to address these by using a single TCP connection with multiple streams. However, middleboxes in the internet slow the adoption of upgrades. QUIC was developed as a new transport protocol to run over UDP and enable always-encrypted connections with fewer head-of-line blocking problems. HTTP/3 defines how HTTP can be run over QUIC, providing features like independent streams and faster handshakes while keeping the basic request-response model of HTTP the same. Several challenges around implementations and tooling remain before HTTP/3 is widely adopted.
Reorganizing Website Architecture for HTTP/2 and BeyondKazuho Oku
This document discusses reorganizing website architecture for HTTP/2 and beyond. It summarizes some issues with HTTP/2 including errors in prioritization where some browsers fail to specify resource priority properly. It also discusses the problem of TCP head-of-line blocking where pending data in TCP buffers can delay higher priority resources. The document proposes solutions to these issues such as prioritizing resources on the server-side and writing only what can be sent immediately to avoid buffer blocking. It also examines the mixed success of HTTP/2 push and argues the server should not push already cached resources.
This document discusses programming TCP for responsiveness when sending HTTP/2 responses. It describes how to reduce head-of-line blocking by filling the TCP congestion window before sending data. The key points are reading TCP states via getsockopt to determine how much data can be sent immediately, and optimizing this only for high latency connections or small congestion windows to avoid additional response delays. Benchmarks show this approach can reduce response times from multiple round-trip times to a single RTT.
The document discusses optimizations to TCP and HTTP/2 to improve responsiveness on the web. It describes how TCP slow start works and the delays introduced in standard HTTP/2 usage from TCP/TLS handshakes. The author proposes adjusting the TCP send buffer polling threshold to allow switching between responses more quickly based on TCP congestion window state. Benchmark results show this can reduce response times by eliminating an extra round-trip delay.
Presentation material for TokyoRubyKaigi11.
Describes techniques used by H2O, including: techniques to optimize TCP for responsiveness, server-push and cache digests.
Cache aware-server-push in H2O version 1.5Kazuho Oku
This document discusses cache-aware server push in H2O version 1.5. It describes calculating a fingerprint of cached assets using a Golomb compressed set to identify what assets need to be pushed from the server. It also discusses implementing this fingerprint using a cookie or service worker. The hybrid approach stores responses in the service worker cache and updates the cookie fingerprint. H2O 1.5 implements cookie-based fingerprints to cancel push indications for cached assets, potentially improving page load speeds.
JSON SQL Injection and the Lessons LearnedKazuho Oku
This document discusses JSON SQL injection and lessons learned from vulnerabilities in SQL query builders. It describes how user-supplied JSON input containing operators instead of scalar values could manipulate queries by injecting conditions like id!='-1' instead of a specific id value. This allows accessing unintended data. The document examines how SQL::QueryMaker and a strict mode in SQL::Maker address this by restricting query parameters to special operator objects or raising errors on non-scalar values. While helpful, strict mode may break existing code, requiring changes to parameter handling. The vulnerability also applies to other languages' frameworks that similarly convert arrays to SQL IN clauses.
This document discusses using the prove command-line tool to run tests and other scripts. Prove is a test runner that uses the Test Anything Protocol (TAP) to aggregate results. It can run tests and scripts written in any language by specifying the interpreter with --exec. Extensions other than .t can be run by setting --ext. Prove searches for tests in the t/ directory by default but can run any kind of scripts or tasks placed in t/, such as service monitoring scripts. The .proverc file can save common prove options for a project.
complete On-Page SEO Best Practices guideRana Hassan
Mastering On-Page SEO—from keyword optimization and content structuring to technical improvements, UX enhancements, and schema markup. This comprehensive guide ensures that your website is fully optimized for search engines and user experience.
HITRUST Overview and AI Assessments Webinar.pptxAmyPoblete3
This webinar provides an overview of HITRUST, a widely recognized cybersecurity framework, and its application in AI assessments for risk management and compliance. It explores different HITRUST assessment options, including AI-specific frameworks, and highlights how organizations can streamline certification processes to enhance security and regulatory adherence.
Mastering FortiWeb: An Extensive Admin Guide for Secure DeploymentsAtakan ATAK
The document was created with reference to the official FortiWeb Admin Guide published by Fortinet. To maintain subject integrity and leverage the manufacturer's expertise, the section headings were closely followed, and the content was developed accordingly.
You can access short videos demonstrating the technical configurations covered in this document on the YouTube page below:
https://www.youtube.com/@PacketGuardAcademy
AstuteAP: AI-Powered Supplier Invoice Automation for Seamless Accounts Payabl...AstuteBusiness
AstuteAP is an AI-powered tool that automates supplier invoice processing, enhancing efficiency, accuracy, and cost savings by streamlining accounts payable workflows with intelligent automation and seamless integration.
文凭购买最佳渠道加拿大文凭多伦多大学成绩单?【q薇1954292140】复刻成绩单加拿大多伦多大学毕业证(UTM毕业证书)毕业证丢失补办 多伦多大学毕业证办理,毕业证外壳加拿大多伦多大学文凭办理,加拿大多伦多大学成绩单办理和真实留信认证、留服认证、多伦多大学学历认证。学院文凭定制,多伦多大学原版文凭补办,扫描件文凭定做,100%文凭复刻。【q薇1954292140】Buy University of Toronto Mississauga Diploma购买美国毕业证,购买英国毕业证,购买澳洲毕业证,购买加拿大毕业证,以及德国毕业证,购买法国毕业证(q薇1954292140)购买荷兰毕业证、购买瑞士毕业证、购买日本毕业证、购买韩国毕业证、购买新西兰毕业证、购买新加坡毕业证、购买西班牙毕业证、购买马来西亚毕业证等。包括了本科毕业证,硕士毕业证。
如果您在英、加、美、澳、欧洲等留学过程中或回国后:
1、在校期间因各种原因未能顺利毕业《UTM成绩单工艺详解》【Q/WeChat:1954292140】《Buy University of Toronto Mississauga Transcript快速办理多伦多大学教育部学历认证书毕业文凭证书》,拿不到官方毕业证;
2、面对父母的压力,希望尽快拿到;
3、不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备;
4、回国时间很长,忘记办理;
5、回国马上就要找工作《正式成绩单多伦多大学学历认证官网》【q薇1954292140】《学位证书样本UTM学历认证复核》办给用人单位看;
6、企事业单位必须要求办理的;
7、需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口、申请留学生创业基金。
加拿大文凭多伦多大学成绩单,UTM毕业证【q薇1954292140】办理加拿大多伦多大学毕业证(UTM毕业证书)【q薇1954292140】学位证明书如何办理申请?多伦多大学offer/学位证毕业证和学位证的区别、留信官方学历认证(永久存档真实可查)采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作。帮你解决多伦多大学学历学位认证难题。
加拿大文凭购买,加拿大文凭定制,加拿大文凭补办。专业在线定制加拿大大学文凭,定做加拿大本科文凭,【q薇1954292140】复制加拿大University of Toronto Mississauga completion letter。在线快速补办加拿大本科毕业证、硕士文凭证书,购买加拿大学位证、多伦多大学Offer,加拿大大学文凭在线购买。高仿真还原加拿大文凭证书和外壳,定制加拿大多伦多大学成绩单和信封。复刻一套文凭多少米UTM毕业证【q薇1954292140】办理加拿大多伦多大学毕业证(UTM毕业证书)【q薇1954292140】高仿文凭证书多伦多大学offer/学位证成绩单购买、留信官方学历认证(永久存档真实可查)采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作。帮你解决多伦多大学学历学位认证难题。
特殊原因导致无法毕业,也可以联系我们帮您办理相关材料:
1:在多伦多大学挂科了,不想读了,成绩不理想怎么办???
2:打算回国了,找工作的时候,需要提供认证《UTM成绩单购买办理多伦多大学毕业证书范本》【Q/WeChat:1954292140】Buy University of Toronto Mississauga Diploma《正式成绩单论文没过》有文凭却得不到认证。又该怎么办???加拿大毕业证购买,加拿大文凭购买,
3:回国了找工作没有多伦多大学文凭怎么办?有本科却要求硕士又怎么办?
帮您解决在加拿大多伦多大学未毕业难题(University of Toronto Mississauga)文凭购买、毕业证购买、大学文凭购买、大学毕业证购买、买文凭、日韩文凭、英国大学文凭、美国大学文凭、澳洲大学文凭、加拿大大学文凭(q薇1954292140)新加坡大学文凭、新西兰大学文凭、爱尔兰文凭、西班牙文凭、德国文凭、教育部认证,买毕业证,毕业证购买,买大学文凭,购买日韩毕业证、英国大学毕业证、美国大学毕业证、澳洲大学毕业证、加拿大大学毕业证(q薇1954292140)新加坡大学毕业证、新西兰大学毕业证、爱尔兰毕业证、西班牙毕业证、德国毕业证,回国证明,留信网认证,留信认证办理,学历认证。从而完成就业。
主营项目:
1、真实教育部国外学历学位认证《加拿大毕业文凭证书快速办理多伦多大学文凭办理》【q薇1954292140】《论文没过多伦多大学正式成绩单》,教育部存档,教育部留服网站100%可查.
2、办理UTM毕业证,改成绩单《UTM毕业证明办理多伦多大学办成绩单》【Q/WeChat:1954292140】Buy University of Toronto Mississauga Certificates《正式成绩单论文没过》,多伦多大学Offer、在读证明、学生卡、信封、证明信等全套材料,从防伪到印刷,从水印到钢印烫金,高精仿度跟学校原版100%相同.
3、真实使馆认证(即留学人员回国证明),使馆存档可通过大使馆查询确认.
4、留信网认证,国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书,留信网存档可查.
《多伦多大学办本科成绩单加拿大毕业证书办理UTM文凭制作案例》【q薇1954292140】学位证1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺:水印,阴影底纹,钢印LOGO烫金烫银,LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。
【q薇1954292140】办理多伦多大学毕业证(UTM毕业证书)专业定制国外文凭学历证书【q薇1954292140】多伦多大学offer/学位证、留信官方学历认证(永久存档真实可查)采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作加拿大多伦多大学毕业证(UTM毕业证书)成绩单制作案例
留信认证的作用:
1. 身份认证:留信认证可以证明你的留学经历是真实的,且你获得的学历或学位是正规且经过认证的。这对于一些用人单位来说,尤其是对留学经历有高度要求的公司(如跨国公司或国内高端企业),这是非常重要的一个凭证。
专业评定:留信认证不仅认证你的学位证书,还会对你的所学专业进行评定。这有助于展示你的学术背景,特别是对于国内企业而言,能够清楚了解你所学专业的水平和价值。
国家人才库入库:认证后,你的信息将被纳入国家人才库,并且可以在国家人才网等平台上展示,供包括500强企业等大型公司挑选和聘用人才。这对于回国找工作特别是进入大公司,具有非常积极的作用。
cyber hacking and cyber fraud by internet online moneyVEENAKSHI PATHAK
Cyber fraud is a blanket term to describe crimes committed by cyberattacks via the internet. These crimes are committed with the intent to illegally acquire and leverage an individual's or business’s sensitive information for monetary gain
Introduction on how unique identifier systems are managed and coordinated - R...APNIC
Sunny Chendi, Senior Regional Advisor, Membership and Policy at APNIC, presented an 'Introduction on how unique identifier systems are managed and coordinated - RIRs (APNIC for APAC), ICANN, IETF and policy development' at MyAPIGA 2025 held in Putrajaya from 16 to 18 February 2025.
Elliptic Curve Cryptography Algorithm with Recurrent Neural Networks for Atta...IJCNCJournal
The increasing use of Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) devices has brought about new security vulnerabilities, emphasizing the need to create strong and effective security solutions. This research proposes a two-layered approach to enhance security in IIoT networks by combining lightweight encryption and RNN-based attack detection. The first layer utilizes Improved Elliptic Curve Cryptography (IECC), a novel encryption scheme tailored for IIoT devices with limited computational resources. IECC employs a Modified Windowed Method (MWM) to optimize key generation, reducing computational overhead and enabling efficient secure data transmission between IIoT sensors and gateways. The second layer employs a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) for real-time attack detection. The RNN model is trained on a comprehensive dataset of IIoT network traffic, including instances of Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS), Man-in-the-Middle (MitM), ransomware attacks, and normal communications. The RNN effectively extracts contextual features from IIoT nodes and accurately predicts and classifies potential attacks. The effectiveness of the proposed two-layered approach is evaluated using three phases. The first phase compares the computational efficiency of IECC to established cryptographic algorithms including RSA, AES, DSA, Diffie-Hellman, SHA-256 and ECDSA. IECC outperforms all competitors in key eneration speed, encryption and decryption time, throughput, memory usage, information loss, and overall processing time. The second phase evaluates the prediction accuracy of the RNN model compared to other AI-based models DNNs, DBNs, RBFNs, and LSTM networks. The proposed RNN achieves the highest overall accuracy of 96.4%, specificity of 96.5%, precision of 95.2%, and recall of 96.8%, and the lowest false positive of 3.2% and false negative rates of 3.1%.
2025年在线购买加拿大文凭百年理工学院成绩单?【q薇1954292140】复刻成绩单加拿大百年理工学院毕业证(CC毕业证书)文凭在线制作 百年理工学院毕业证办理,办留学学历认证加拿大百年理工学院文凭办理,加拿大百年理工学院成绩单办理和真实留信认证、留服认证、百年理工学院学历认证。学院文凭定制,百年理工学院原版文凭补办,扫描件文凭定做,100%文凭复刻。【q薇1954292140】Buy Centennial College of Applied Arts and Technology Diploma购买美国毕业证,购买英国毕业证,购买澳洲毕业证,购买加拿大毕业证,以及德国毕业证,购买法国毕业证(q薇1954292140)购买荷兰毕业证、购买瑞士毕业证、购买日本毕业证、购买韩国毕业证、购买新西兰毕业证、购买新加坡毕业证、购买西班牙毕业证、购买马来西亚毕业证等。包括了本科毕业证,硕士毕业证。
如果您在英、加、美、澳、欧洲等留学过程中或回国后:
1、在校期间因各种原因未能顺利毕业《CC成绩单工艺详解》【Q/WeChat:1954292140】《Buy Centennial College of Applied Arts and Technology Transcript快速办理百年理工学院教育部学历认证书毕业文凭证书》,拿不到官方毕业证;
2、面对父母的压力,希望尽快拿到;
3、不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备;
4、回国时间很长,忘记办理;
5、回国马上就要找工作《正式成绩单百年理工学院学历证书申请》【q薇1954292140】《成绩单详解细节CC毕业证书样本》办给用人单位看;
6、企事业单位必须要求办理的;
7、需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口、申请留学生创业基金。
加拿大文凭百年理工学院成绩单,CC毕业证【q薇1954292140】办理加拿大百年理工学院毕业证(CC毕业证书)【q薇1954292140】办成绩单百年理工学院offer/学位证文凭购买、留信官方学历认证(永久存档真实可查)采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作。帮你解决百年理工学院学历学位认证难题。
加拿大文凭购买,加拿大文凭定制,加拿大文凭补办。专业在线定制加拿大大学文凭,定做加拿大本科文凭,【q薇1954292140】复制加拿大Centennial College of Applied Arts and Technology completion letter。在线快速补办加拿大本科毕业证、硕士文凭证书,购买加拿大学位证、百年理工学院Offer,加拿大大学文凭在线购买。高仿真还原加拿大文凭证书和外壳,定制加拿大百年理工学院成绩单和信封。毕业证样本CC毕业证【q薇1954292140】办理加拿大百年理工学院毕业证(CC毕业证书)【q薇1954292140】毕业证办理需要多久拿到?百年理工学院offer/学位证办理学历认证书扫码可查、留信官方学历认证(永久存档真实可查)采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作。帮你解决百年理工学院学历学位认证难题。
特殊原因导致无法毕业,也可以联系我们帮您办理相关材料:
1:在百年理工学院挂科了,不想读了,成绩不理想怎么办???
2:打算回国了,找工作的时候,需要提供认证《CC成绩单购买办理百年理工学院毕业证书范本》【Q/WeChat:1954292140】Buy Centennial College of Applied Arts and Technology Diploma《正式成绩单论文没过》有文凭却得不到认证。又该怎么办???加拿大毕业证购买,加拿大文凭购买,
3:回国了找工作没有百年理工学院文凭怎么办?有本科却要求硕士又怎么办?
帮您解决在加拿大百年理工学院未毕业难题(Centennial College of Applied Arts and Technology)文凭购买、毕业证购买、大学文凭购买、大学毕业证购买、买文凭、日韩文凭、英国大学文凭、美国大学文凭、澳洲大学文凭、加拿大大学文凭(q薇1954292140)新加坡大学文凭、新西兰大学文凭、爱尔兰文凭、西班牙文凭、德国文凭、教育部认证,买毕业证,毕业证购买,买大学文凭,购买日韩毕业证、英国大学毕业证、美国大学毕业证、澳洲大学毕业证、加拿大大学毕业证(q薇1954292140)新加坡大学毕业证、新西兰大学毕业证、爱尔兰毕业证、西班牙毕业证、德国毕业证,回国证明,留信网认证,留信认证办理,学历认证。从而完成就业。
主营项目:
1、真实教育部国外学历学位认证《加拿大毕业文凭证书快速办理百年理工学院毕业证/成绩单/可认证》【q薇1954292140】《论文没过百年理工学院正式成绩单》,教育部存档,教育部留服网站100%可查.
2、办理CC毕业证,改成绩单《CC毕业证明办理百年理工学院买一个在线制作本科文凭》【Q/WeChat:1954292140】Buy Centennial College of Applied Arts and Technology Certificates《正式成绩单论文没过》,百年理工学院Offer、在读证明、学生卡、信封、证明信等全套材料,从防伪到印刷,从水印到钢印烫金,高精仿度跟学校原版100%相同.
3、真实使馆认证(即留学人员回国证明),使馆存档可通过大使馆查询确认.
4、留信网认证,国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书,留信网存档可查.
《百年理工学院办本科毕业证加拿大毕业证书办理CC办理学历认证》【q薇1954292140】学位证1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺:水印,阴影底纹,钢印LOGO烫金烫银,LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。
【q薇1954292140】办理百年理工学院毕业证(CC毕业证书)专业定制国外成绩单【q薇1954292140】百年理工学院offer/学位证、留信官方学历认证(永久存档真实可查)采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作加拿大百年理工学院毕业证(CC毕业证书)留信网认证
留信认证的作用:
1. 身份认证:留信认证可以证明你的留学经历是真实的,且你获得的学历或学位是正规且经过认证的。这对于一些用人单位来说,尤其是对留学经历有高度要求的公司(如跨国公司或国内高端企业),这是非常重要的一个凭证。
专业评定:留信认证不仅认证你的学位证书,还会对你的所学专业进行评定。这有助于展示你的学术背景,特别是对于国内企业而言,能够清楚了解你所学专业的水平和价值。
国家人才库入库:认证后,你的信息将被纳入国家人才库,并且可以在国家人才网等平台上展示,供包括500强企业等大型公司挑选和聘用人才。这对于回国找工作特别是进入大公司,具有非常积极的作用。
50. HTTP/2
Real pages
• 8 pages (from 8 real sites)
• 16 bandwidth/latency combinations
– Each with 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2% PLR
• Firefox and Chrome, TLS only, collect all metrics
• 300-400 runs with each combination
51. HTTP/2
Real pages
• 8 pages (from 8 real sites)
• 16 bandwidth/latency combinations
– Each with 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2% PLR
• Firefox and Chrome, TLS only, collect all metrics
• 300-400 runs with each combination
52. HTTP/2
Analysis
• 3 Types of pages, # of resources h1àh2:
– ~75% or higher
– ~half
– ~25% or lower
• 2 profiles (0%, 0.5%, 1%, 2% PLR):
– “Broadband”: 5Mbps/1Mbps/40ms
– “Slow 3G”: 780Kbps/330Kbps/200ms
• 3 Metrics
– Document Complete
– DOM Content Loaded Start
– Speed Index