Avatar

me when im a bug

@dragon-mantis / dragon-mantis.tumblr.com

she/they/it | aroace | really likes bugs and crocodiles

tumblr milestone: edit pinned post unlocked

hi! im nickel. im just vibin 👍

ao3 is PocketChange_FallenStars, i mostly just write poetry but i do have a few fanfics on there

self tag is nickels talkin, writing tag is nickels writin or nickels poetry, embroidery tag is nickels embroidery, you get the picture

also! because i have been followed before by people who have 'dsmp dni' in their bio, i am a dsmp fan

here there be mcytshipping, enter at your own risk

please dont send me mutual aid asks or dms

mutuals can dm me for my discord

aquarium advertisments say stuiff like discover the longtooth grouper this friday

I see that, and raise you my local aquarium's advertising.

Vancouver Aquarium has similar ads!

They also have some SERIOUSLY inventive ones:

(High and Low Tide ^)

the only type of advertising that should exist: "ooooohhhh you want to come look at the animal"

Avatar
Reblogged

Anyways, been thinking about Double Life again, and I think Scott's treatment of Pearl was less about Pearl and more about the concept of soulmates generally.

I mean- Scott can be petty, of course. He often doesn't respond well to perceived slights, and is more than willing and capable of making people regret it if he feels like they insulted him.

But, despite his policy of pettiness, I'd also consider Scott to be relatively slow to anger and relatively quick to forgive. Scott has always been someone who sees great value in diplomacy. If someone is treating him like an easy mark or really pushing boundaries, he'll retaliate to prove he's not an easy target (and maybe for his own pride a bit), but he generally leads with peace, and he doesn't often stay angry with people who are willing to be diplomatic.

Which is why it always confused me just a little bit, from a characterization standpoint, why Scott was so immediately and irreparably hostile toward Pearl at the beginning of Double Life over the very very minor 'slight' of her going to the nether instead of trying to find him immediately. Especially when Pearl was very amenable and very much wanted to be a team, and especially because sticking with your soulmate is the most strategically viable course of action anyways. (oorp this is because it was fun dramatic content for youtube. but you guys know i love to build characterization where there is none.)

And honestly I think it really is just that Scott was deeply upset by the concept of soulmates. By the universe tying him to another person and trying to force him to rely on and support them, to love them, just because he's 'supposed' to. Hell, after the previous season, where Scott famously defied fate in a way that made the universe itself angry, maybe it even felt like a punishment, like a chain around his throat there to force him to, whether he likes it or not, lose some part of his agency and personal identity to a person he doesn't even get to choose.

I almost feel like it wouldn't have mattered who that person was or what they did, I think Scott would have been repulsed by the implicit act of force regardless. It wasn't really about Pearl. Although, Pearl going to the nether and taking significant damage there that Scott could not prevent but had to experience in full probably did reaffirm how little Scott could stand the concept of soulmates.

Which isn't to say the way Scott acted toward Pearl is justified- the thing about displaced disgust and frustration is that the target of it is inherently undeserving of it, and while Scott had every right to choose who he wanted to partner with, I think we can all agree he was very harsh with Pearl long before she actually did anything to him.

But I do think we're too quick to see this situation as Scott actually just being wildly petty over a very mild 'slight' from Pearl because of, presumably, pure ego, when I actually think it was moreso a very real and valid- but very misplaced- repulsion.

Me, starting a video that says it's going to explain how Victorian poorhouses fucked up the concept of charity forever: ok, show me what you've got

Video: it starts with the ideas of the Christian philosopher --

Me: DON'T SAY IT DON'T FUCKING SAY IT

Video: -- John Calvin

Me:

Who (he asks, half to piss you off and half because he genuinely doesn't know)

You can't piss me off with that question, because unless you were raised like I was - deeply religiously and within an Evangelical Protestant family - you will probably have never heard of John Calvin.

In short: John Calvin was a French theologian during the Protestant Reformation. He was a philosopher in the same way that ebola is a living thing, or the same way that C4 on a bridge revitalizes a riverfront. If you're familiar with the way that many people say that Reagan is to blame for everything shitty about modern American politics, well, they're half right.

A lot of it is actually John Calvin's fault, but that's just because his shit philosophies are responsible for ~90% of the shit you hate about American life, period.

I'm British but wow

Good (actually terrible, but) news: John Calvin is also responsible for fucking up where you live!

Anglicanism's major tenets were formed largely by Thomas Cranmer attempting to negotiate a "middle way" between Lutheranism & Calvinism. Many aspects of Calvinism were adopted into the Reformed traditions central to Anglican theology & the via media, or middle way, is unfortunately basically just two shitty people playing tug-of-war over the exact way in which Anglicanism would be terrible. This is so foundational to the Church of England that it is addressed in the 3rd paragraph of the opening section of the Wikipedia page on Anglicanism.

Sorry to be the bearer of shitty news! John Calvin is the Worst!

Calvinism, in brief, for those unaware:

  • Free will isn't real. God makes literally everything happen, and if you complain about it you're complaining about God.
  • Why does God let bad things happen to good people? Fuck you, that's why. Are you questioning God?
  • God already decided if you're going to Heaven or Hell, probably before you were born. There's nothing you can do about it. It doesn't matter if you try to be a good person, or if you accept Jesus, or if you go to confession, or if you saved five thousand orphans from a burning building. If God ~mysteriously~ decides "fuck you, burn forever", that's your fate.
  • However, God likes to show little signs of who he likes. Say, having lots of money, or being hot, or not having horrible illnesses. Good things happen to "the elect", who are people God likes. Bad things happen to everyone else.
  • Rich people are probably going to Heaven, and they're just better than you, because that's God's secret sign that he likes them more than you. Why? Because fuck you.
  • If bad things happen to you, it's probably because you deserve it and you're going to Hell. Likewise, if you're poor, ugly, or disabled, you're probably going to Hell.

All of this bullshit has of course had a heavy influence on:

  • Capitalism, because having money isn't a sign that you're exploiting people, it's a sign that God mysteriously wants you to have nice things. Nothing you can do about it, free will isn't real!
  • Imperialism, because if you succeed in taking over a place and stealing all their stuff, that's a sign that God likes you. If God liked them, it wouldn't have happened, so you're really following God's plan. And torturing people who are already going to Hell barely even counts, they probably deserve it!
  • American exceptionalism specifically. Consider the above, and mysteriously, all the native people start dying, leaving vast tracts of land for your people to settle. Well, gosh! God genocided a continent to show that it was secretly always ours! He must really like us!
  • Witch trials, debtors prisons, insane asylums, &c. They aren't hot or rich, so by definition, they're probably evil and deserve for bad things to happen to them!

... and half of the other shitty things that happen in our society, basically. Calvinism is horrific and it underlies a lot - especially in the US and UK, because the Puritans and Roundheads were mostly Calvinists.

(This was the religious freedom that the Pilgrims were seeking. The freedom to be horrible antisocial creeps.)

This is a pretty good basic summary, yep.

"his shit philosophies are responsible for ~90% of the shit you hate about American life, period." -- And the rest is John Hobbes, yeah.

Hobbes in a nutshell: "People are inherently brutal and animalistic and hungry for power and lazy, and it is only through Civilization (read: submitting to the will of Leaders) that we can suppress the violence of human nature and have Order. Our natural state of being is 'a war of all against all'" (Like, you know the Purge? That's what Hobbes thinks is the real way that humans would behave without Rules and Laws and Civilization keeping them in line. Or you know how journalists love to wring their hands about "oooh after this natural disaster everyone just went wild and started murdering each other and LOOTING everything" -- that's the Hobbesian perspective, and it is so pervasive that people are CONVINCED that's what really happens after a natural disaster. But in actuality people in disasters tend to show their best selves and start helping each other out and banding together and showing amazing solidarity.

Hobbes is where we get a lot of the "oooh scary lawless immigrants sneaking across the border and doing GOD KNOWS WHAT" bullshit, and the "most people are Bad and untrustworthy and so we" thing Anyway read HUMANKIND: A Hopeful History by Rutger Bregman, it is SO FUCKING GOOD and it will explain all this in a really conversational, accessible, often very funny tone. And then deconstruct it and tear it down and offer realistic, hopeful, progressive alternatives.

Hello hello! Havent talked to you in a good bit, curious if you took the photo for your pfp since its a new flower and the last one you took yourself

If you were a letter, what letter would you be?

Avatar

i did yeah! i actually took both pics on the same day at a rose garden

heres a close up of the picture, its got a filter over it to sharpen it a bit

if i was a letter i think i would be a q

Avatar
Reblogged

Do I post the wip for some art im working on rn? I can’t decide if it’ll make me more likely to actually finish it or if it will make me feel worse if I don’t yk

Uh well, it’s a pretty rough sketch but the end result isn’t going to be a drawing so I’m happy with it

Avatar
Reblogged

i watched arcane recently and when i got to the bits you referenced in your bedrock bros au i paused the show and went :O just like denz!!!

(if you were carpet, would you be short or shag?)

Avatar

just like me!!! Im so honoured that was your association i need to do more with that au i do love it. How are you liking arcane? I just cant get over how fantastic it's artstyle is ill be honest the entire au was based on "What if i drew my favs as the poster. what then"

Id be a shag carpet that is also pink, love shag carpets but i know if i had one it would just get so so dirty

Avatar

i have been loving arcane. much like dsmp where you have to pick your favorite war criminal and i think thats awesome. the art is so so pretty

Avatar
personpitch2007

DELETE THIS POST

Avatar
stumbleoutermales

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME

*clicks play in morbid curiosity*

*hammers reblog button*

I think I find this post every April Fools Day and I am so happy that I do

Ikrit almost spat out his smoothie XD

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.