Pinned
First real self portrait in ages. Marvel at my leg jungles
Reblogged
Ink, gel pen, and acrylic over a risograph texture I printed. 11x14 on bristol.
I did a walkthrough of the process on my website.
Reblogged mantischildren
BEETLE PRINTS ARE BACK!!
This time they're screen printed and come in 3 colours combos! I'm super jazzed for the warmer weather finally hitting the UK because it means all my favourite beetles will be out and about for me to find again 💚🪲
You can grab yourself one on my shop! (Only 4 of each one for this round)
Reblogged
Atomic robo has ruined sci-fi for me because it's fake science is based on real science and it explains how it's fake science works and how it would work with real science OR they just make robo get upset that the fake science is to fake
And now those are my sci-fi standards
Damn you Brian clevinger
The thing is: it's relatively easy to pull off this vibe.
- Do some research about the topic. Typically, I start with wikipedia and go wherever it takes me. We're not writing hard SF here, so taking a more superficial/broad stroke approach like this is fine. Plus, you can uncover more "serious" resources linked to the articles as well as stumble upon other related topics to research.
- Now two things will occur while write your sci-fi bullshit. First, it will naturally begin to conform to some of the things you learned. Second, you will find opportunities to drop hints/references to some of the research you did. Often, the same details will serve both purposes. Doing these things demonstrates that you've done your homework, which makes people who would go, "Okay, but it doesn't work like that," realize that you, as the author, also know, "It doesn't work like that," so they'll cut you some slack because you've shown that you know what you're doing. The bullshit in your sci-fi was a conscious decision to bend the rules instead of simply breaking them because you didn't know any better. You are, in essence, giving yourself permission to play around with the laws of physics in service of your story.
- This method also lends a veneer of plausibility to the layperson who doesn't know or care whether or not the sci-fi is bullshit. It also tends to result in more consistent "rules" governing how the bullshit of your sci-fi setting operate which makes for easier brainstorming, plotting, outlining, and writing.
- The most common error I've seen when implementing this method is going overboard. You quite literally only need one or two tidbits! Name drop a theory or method or researcher. Congrats, y'done! No derail necessary. But authors screw this up all the time. Not just in sci-fi writers, it's just very common in sci-fi writing because the sort of folks writing sci-fi are nerds who enjoy doing the research (guilty, as charged). And the thing about doing research is that you will inevitably uncover a lot of interesting and surprising facts and relationships. It is perfectly natural to get excited about sharing the thrill of those discoveries with anyone who will listen and, hey look at that, your audience is literally a captive audience. Here's the thing though: you went looking for research while your audience went looking for a story. So, when you think you're sharing some fascinating ideas/facts, your readers are getting increasingly annoyed that you've stopped the story for this derail about potato farming, or electrostatic values, or whatever the fuck it is. Characters are what make a story interesting, while facts are just details. Your reader doesn't want more facts, they want more character. Therefore, when it's time to share facts to support the plausibility of the story, it behooves you to use the bare minimum.
Reblogged punkitt-is-here
monkey i love you beloved little freak i would die for you
like……… look at this face
UNREAL
Source: x.com
Reblogged rat-bacteria
Reblogged by-and-for-rodents
the whole point of a zine is that it's cheap to produce, amateur and homemade. if you're being asked to apply to participate in a print project, it is not a zine. if the final product is being printed and bound professionally, it is not a zine. if you are being asked to enter into any kind of licensing agreement more complex than "my work can be reproduced as part of this publication" it is not a zine. nine times put of ten if the final product costs more than $5 you have left zine country. im so serious about this.
this isn't snobby gatekeeping or imaginary semantic problems or whatever, this is an issue that has come up irl at cons and zine fairs local to me and which keeps coming up online. people who show up to trade fairs selling professionally printed $15 anthologies as 'zines' have a direct impact on the people trying to sell their $3 chapbooks at the next table over. submission based kickstarter projects that bill themselves as 'zines' exploit the connotations of amateur, punk production values to induce creators to work for less and eschew formal guarantees and protections they are entitled to.
my favorite zines have all been $1 or free and printed on highlighter paper. i used to pick em up from a book store in chelsea that sold predominantly self published work, and had sections for zines. Some were about how to eat cheap in the city when most of your paycheck went to rent, others were talking about the best drag performances in town, and plenty of DIY stuff. all of them had the same unique quality: nobody but the author and their collaborators could've made this, and they wanted to make it easily accessible to the community
i kinda hate that the word that was used for extremely personal and cheap works is applied to essentially art books of your favorite anime OTP
hi! sorry, real quick:
- grab a piece of paper and fold it in half like a book
- write "im indifferent to zines" on the cover
- write "i've never been able to buy one" on the first page
- write "and i'll never be in one" on the second page
- write "just want to be a hater today" on the back
congrats you're in a zine! if you like you can photocopy it and sell it to art students, fellow haters, or anyone with a sense of humour. I'll buy one.
ive been saying this since 2015! all my illustrator friends kept submitting to them (and gettin in which i was proud of) but they... werent zines. they were like massive books with grandiose color schemes and gilded bossing. i couldnt afford them even. zines are oft free or traded and they arent about how pretty a picture you can make.
the first zine idea i found was in a book i checked out from the library (id never remember what it was. it was about cartooning i think and had a section about chibi style lol) that had a little section on taking one sheet of paper, marking it into eighths, cutting a line in the center of the page and folding it over for a quick eight pages. like this
this makes printing soooo easy too. id love to see these floating around places
So I scrolled past this post and was thinking the same thought I always do when I see people talking about zines, which is basically ‘zines are so cool, I’ve never made one because I don’t think I have anything interesting to say in one, but I should make a zine someday if I ever have creative energy again’ and then it gets added to my ever growing mental list of things I want to do but don’t end up doing (I have spent the last several years struggling so hard with my depression that I can’t seam to create anything at all)
And then I thought, hey I have a piece of paper by my desk I should at least follow that diagram and fold it, that way I’m halfway there even if it’s blank and sits on my desk for months, and then 5 minutes later I had this:
Now I’m just holding this little thing I’ve made in my hands and I love it so much
So thank you to this post for inspiring me to make something today! Even if it’s just a simple silly little thing I’m going to treasure it
Amazing! Not only did I not know to correct pronunciation of 'zine', but I also had no idea that they connect black history, political activism, the origins of the Kirk/Spock ship, and feminism. Such a powerful force in history these little homemade magazines.
There is great info about zine making here but… OPs definition of “zine” is just… unnecessarily restrictive and outright wrong ... Zines HAVE ALWAYS included the full range of publications from 8-page sheets that get photocopied to full colour fanart collections. The term zine derives from “fanzine”. The first fanzines were collections of amateur sci fi art and writing. Sure, zines encompass a much wider array of publications now, but that does not mean we change the definition to cut out what we deem to be too “professional.” (Also hint: something being classified as a zine has less to do with how it’s printed and more to do with who it is published by and how it is circulated. But you have to first understand that there is a distinction between printing and publication to grasp this.)
A zine does not have to be made by only a few authors, or DIY, or sold for under $15 to be classified as a zine. Zines are their own medium with their own unique history and their own diverse ecosystem, why would you want to strip that complexity away? You can inspire people to make their own and inform them how to do it without bowdlerizing the whole form and bulldozing over all the connections between the different groups and purposes zines have served and continue to serve.
thanks for the bad faith reading. you're wrong, btw.
I aready said this isn't a semantic thing, but you if you really want to go there: 'zine' is a shortening of fanzine or magazine and the concept of a 'fanzine' itself is directly derived from a style of independently published magazine that has roots at least as far back as the Harlem Renaissance and arguably the political pamphleteering of the french and american revolutions. but the actual point I was making is that the entire ethos of zine making originates in an effort to broaden access to publication, and we are losing that.
am I saying nobody ever slapped a $20 cover price on a zine before the 2020s? no! am I saying no influential underground publication has ever made the crossing into fully fledged magazine? no! am I saying I will come to your house and punch your teeth in personally if you use the word zine in a way I find objectionable? no! I'm saying the trajectory of commercialisation, professionalisation and lost knowledge is not only stripping foundational meaning from the form but directly harms the viability of low-overhead zine production. just look through the notes of this post for dozens of people saying they'd never heard of the homemade zine before this post, that they'd been burned by high production 'zine' projects and soured on the whole concept as a result. no equivocation: this shit is killing the medium.
but hey, maybe the $15 zine is the norm and I'm just pearl clutching because I don't like genshin impact or whatever. let's look at the cover prices of some historically important zines at launch:
oh sorry, my bad, these aren't 'fanzines' let's try again
mm but of course the very first fanzines ever published would be cheap and amateur, the form was still being figured out. what about the one everyone on tumblr loves to call the birth of fandom:
well fine, but what about zines that deal with serious social issues? that involve research, outreach, even risk on the part of the creators?
believe it or not (or refuse to believe it) but the history of zines is not the history of bag-getters. accessibility has always been the lifeblood of the form, and that includes financial accessibility.
I have zero fucking power to wave a wand and magically exclude everyone whose projects I think are tacky from using the tem 'zine', but what I can do is appeal to people to remember that being asked to submit a portfolio for consideration is the exception, not the norm. gloss covers and kickstarter tiers with vinyl keychains and custom wall art is a new and alien graft on a very old medium. being treated like a subcontractor on a 50-person art collaboration that will only be affordable to middle class kids with middle class disposable income runs entirely counter to what used to be the definitional feature of zine making. sure I'm being intractable. I think we should all be a lot more intractable about this. we saw what happened to webcomics.
Reblogged by-and-for-rodents
Video captions: And stop trying to show your ex what they missed out on! Stop trying to teach your family a lesson for not believing in you! Stop trying to shit on your haters! Do it for you! Do it because you deserve it! Do it for YOU! Water your dreams with love! Don’t put no hate and resentment, and try to — “oh Imma fucking show them, Imma show” — FUCK THEM! Fuck them, do it for you! They don’t matter! They NEVER mattered.