Avatar

The Strange Case Of Mr. Beck And Mr. Hyde

@i-am-mrhyde

He/they/it
MINOR!!!
Secret alt to post stuff I can’t on my main
Really obsessed with Jekyll and Hyde rn so that’s the url and general theme lmao

Short little pinned post

He/they/it

Minor

Call me Beck, Mori or Hyde (trying out Hyde as a name. This obsession is getting bad gang). It’s interchangeable I don’t mind.

Physically disabled (I AM annoying about this. I love Cripplepunk)

Really into J&H rn, I relate to it a scary amount.

Might get vent-y or personal idk. Blacklist “#vent post” if you don’t want to see those.

Mr. Hyde Spotify playlist link. Feel free to give me suggestions for it (through asks or comments idk), I might add them.

Dramatic obnoxious sigh.

Thematically relevant gifs under cut lmao

Been thinking a lot about the constant dehumanisation that’s like inherent to every description of Hyde and how that’s what we’re TAUGHT to say about him, when in reality the crux of what Hyde is is WHOLLY HUMAN. He’s not some mindless animal or a demon taking over, he’s every HUMAN aspect that Jekyll wants or has to hide.

Also the inherent ableism of that. “The reason this guy looks weird is because he’s evil/he’s evil because he looks weird” is a CRAZY message.

Hyde is entirely human and characters within the book can’t handle that so they dehumanise him consistently until he’s dead and they finally realise that oh, this was a HUMAN BEING.

Avatar
Reblogged

J&H questions in the English lit mock today how do I kms fast. How the fuck am I gonna answer questions about Hyde without bringing up disability. WHAT IF THE QUESTION IS LIKE “how is Hyde shown to be scary?” Or some shit 😭 FHFKFKEJNAHWJSJJF COLLAPSES AND DIES

Friend just reminded me what physiognomy was. I win nvm guys

I CAVED UNDER 0 PRESSURE AND WROTE ABOUT DISABILITY. I win though because the extract we had to focus on was REALLY good for writing about that. I also wrote about the dehumanisation that’s inherent to almost every description of Hyde and how he’s only given humanity once he’s dead. TLDR: I won. Everything.

Avatar
Reblogged

J&H questions in the English lit mock today how do I kms fast. How the fuck am I gonna answer questions about Hyde without bringing up disability. WHAT IF THE QUESTION IS LIKE “how is Hyde shown to be scary?” Or some shit 😭 FHFKFKEJNAHWJSJJF COLLAPSES AND DIES

Friend just reminded me what physiognomy was. I win nvm guys

J&H questions in the English lit mock today how do I kms fast. How the fuck am I gonna answer questions about Hyde without bringing up disability. WHAT IF THE QUESTION IS LIKE “how is Hyde shown to be scary?” Or some shit 😭 FHFKFKEJNAHWJSJJF COLLAPSES AND DIES

Avatar
Reblogged

Wahhhh mock exams start today for me 😭😭 it’s English language first. Not even the one that has J&H in it. Cries

I don’t think it went AWFULLY. But also holy fuck I have non calc maths tomorrow 😭

I think we need one of those popular read-along blogs to tackle The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde in the same way that's been done for Dracula and Moby-Dick. The number of folks around here who appear to be under the impression that reading a queer subtext into Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is a subversion rather than being straightforwardly material to the plot is frankly embarrassing, and I'm assuming this is because nobody's actually read the damn thing.

A brief refresher for the folks asking "what queer subtext": though this element is often dropped from modern adaptations owing to audience familiarity, in the original book, the fact that Jekyll and Hyde are the same person is framed as a twist. The front half of the novel concerns a friend of Jekyll's named Gabriel Utterson investigating the nature of the relationship between Jekyll and Hyde, and trying to figure out why Jekyll appears to be protecting Hyde. Though Utterson seems to have arrived at a conclusion early on, this conclusion is disclosed neither to other characters nor to the reader.

Later, once the cat is out of the bag, it's explained that the original motivation behind Jekyll's scientific research was not to create a transformative serum, but to purge himself of a certain flaw in his character, the nature of which is not described. It's additionally alluded to that this character flaw led him to commit a series of shameful indiscretions in his youth, the nature of which is not elaborated upon.

Questions for further discussion:

  1. Prior to the big reveal, what does reading between the lines suggest Utterson thinks is going on between Jekyll and Hyde, and why is he so reluctant to disclose this belief?
  2. What is the significance of the fact that the nature of the character flaw of which Jekyll sought to rid himself is never specified, nor the particulars of the shameful acts it led him to commit?
  3. Why are there so many older unmarried men – including both Utterson and Jekyll himself – kicking around in this story, anyway?

As someone who has read and loved The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde I feel it's important to add that a gay interpretation is infinitely more accurate then any interpretations about mental illness, especially D.I.D.

That's a movie invention

All of it. Mr. Hyde being this monstrous, super powered, The Beast esque person, is a movie

In the book Hyde is literally just Jekyll(not his evil dark side. Just Jekyll. Just jekyll.)

Avatar
Reblogged

whatever you do please don’t think of Gabriel Utterson leaving red roses on a little unmarked grave not on consecrated ground where they put all the London School of Pathology couldn’t make a specimen. 💚

Avatar
Reblogged

i love hydeseek sm HRHRHEHFRGE all these stupid motherfuckers in this stupid story are so enamoring and i fucking. AGRGRGRRRRRRRRWOWOFOFO

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.