User talk:Александр Сигачёв

From Wikidata
(Redirected from User talk:Botik)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Logo of Wikidata Welcome to Wikidata, Александр Сигачёв!

Wikidata is a free knowledge base that you can edit! It can be read and edited by humans and machines alike and you can go to any item page now and add to this ever-growing database!

Need some help getting started? Here are some pages you can familiarize yourself with:

  • Introduction – An introduction to the project.
  • Wikidata tours – Interactive tutorials to show you how Wikidata works.
  • Community portal – The portal for community members.
  • User options – including the 'Babel' extension, to set your language preferences.
  • Contents – The main help page for editing and using the site.
  • Project chat – Discussions about the project.
  • Tools – A collection of user-developed tools to allow for easier completion of some tasks.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask on Project chat. If you want to try out editing, you can use the sandbox to try. Once again, welcome, and I hope you quickly feel comfortable here, and become an active editor for Wikidata.

Best regards! Cycn

Merging items

[edit]

Hallo Alexander,

When you are merging items, please use the Merge.js gadget. It helps you nominating, gives the option to always keep the lower number (which is older, so preferable) and makes it a lot easier for the admins to process the requests.

With regards, - User:CycnUser:CycnUser:CycnUser:Cycn - (Cycn/talk) 14:46, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It's a good idea. --Александр Сигачёв (talk) 14:58, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Russian job codes

[edit]

Hi Alexander, Would you consider adding the Russian job code system as a property ? Thanks a lot for the Russian labels for the existing properties, --Teolemon (talk) 21:37, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I'm not qualified in this field. I suppose some Russian job code systems became obsolete --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Описания от бота

[edit]

Привет. Наткнулся на такую правку твоего бота. Кривовато :) Можешь поправить такие ситуации? GranD (talk) 17:13, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Да, забавно. Спасибо за замечание. Да, это была неудачная попытка запуска бота в мае. После 2 минут работы я его остановил, поняв, что многое нужно дорабатывать. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 06:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Однодольные

[edit]

Откуда уверенность, что Q1147601 тоже однодольные при существующем monocots (Q78961)? --Infovarius (talk) 10:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Я не большой знаток ботаники, но насколько я понимаю, это какая-то терминологическая путаница, нашедшая своё отражение в Викиданных. См. [1][2]. Как лучше поступить в этой ситуации я не знаю. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Собственно, в w:ru:Однодольные об этом сказано --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 11:35, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add labels in deprecated languages

[edit]

Hi, you're probably not aware of this, but there are some language codes that should not be used, see here. Please update your Botik so it doesn't make edits like this. Danmichaelo (talk) 15:23, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for comment. I'll try to corret its code --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 16:26, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Error with Q16709284

[edit]

It seems, you are wrong with this edit. Are you ? --Movses (talk) 06:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I should have less confident to categories ("Персоналии по алфавиту" in Russian article) --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 07:10, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Странные даты рождения/смерти

[edit]

Добрый день, не могли бы указать источник этих утверждений? — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 08:12, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Эти правки - загадка для меня самого. Судя по соседним правкам, они были сделаны посредством wikidata-game, а значит должны основывать на данных статьи Википедии, но в ней самой нет таких данных. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 14:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Не пробовал этот инструмент, но похоже он не предоставляет достаточного контроля над вносимыми с его помощью правками. Вы бы обсудили с его автором ситуацию. — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 20:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Esperantistoj

[edit]

Saluton! Dankon pro viaj aldonoj de "okupo: Esperantisto" ĉe kelkaj eroj, kiujn mi redaktis. Mi ĝojas retrovi vin ĉi tie kaj pro via kunlaboro. Rilate al la kondiĉoj kiujn oni difinis ĉe Property talk:P1601, mi tamen opinias, ke ni devus ankoraŭ findecidi pri tio, ĉu en Vikidatumoj ni marku Esperantistojn ĉu per "okupo: Esperantisto", ĉu per "lingvo parolata: Esperanto", ĉu eble per ambaŭ. Laŭ mia observo ni ĝis nun uzas precipe la unuan, sed la eksterulo kiu helpis starigi la novan trajton preferas la duan. Ĉu vi scias, ĉu jam ekzistas iu interkonsento? Kaj se ne, kie demandi por ke ankaŭ aliaj Esperantistoj en Vikidatumoj povu doni sian opinion? Amike --Blahma (talk) 17:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bonfarton, Marek! Mi ĝojas, ke vi zorgas pri esperantaj temoj en Vikidatumo, ja tio gravas. Ve mi eĉ ne provis trovi la konsenton, sed simple uzis http://tools.wmflabs.org/autolist/index.php por kategorio "Esperantistoj". Pripensinte la aferon, mi ekopinias, ke estus pli bone uzi "okupo: Esperantisto" nur se persono estas konata kiel aktivisto pri esperanta movado - Esperantist (Q860918) estas "subklaso" de activist (Q15253558). Kaj aldoni "lingvo parolata: Esperanto" por ĉiuj eroj de "Esperantisoj" kategorio. Ŝajne, pridiskuti tion ni devus ĉe Esperanto Vikipedio, kie koncentrado de esperantistoj estas pli granda. Kion vi opinias? --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 19:47, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу обосновать эту Вашу правку. — Vvk121 (talk) 00:14, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Честно говоря, не помню этой правки. Вероятно, это как-то связано с тем, что он включён в w:ru:Категория:Архитекторы по алфавиту, хотя, очевидно, что в данном случае это нерелевантная информация (особенно с нормальным рангом). --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Сергей

[edit]

Sergei (Q18946921) is duplicate to Sergey (Q18946708). May you delete the first?--Kopiersperre (talk) 20:17, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Seems so, but I don't fully understand topic of name elements in Wikidata. Sometimes they are very strange. I think, It is better to raise the issue at any forum. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The problem (for non-Cyrillic users) is that these items have different latin spelling. Some persons can have only Sergei as the main name, the others only Sergey... But of course, from point of view of Cyrillic users the items should be merged... I don't know how to solve this paradox. --Infovarius (talk) 19:51, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
And more. We should also consider Ukrainian spelling and transliteration, which is different from Russian. Are names Сергей (Sergey, Segrei) and Сергій (Sergiy) the same? And what if same person use both variants? --90.154.75.191 05:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In this case they put statements with both values now. --Infovarius (talk) 12:18, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saluton!

Dankon pri aldoni la rusan nomon en public transportation terminus (Q20202390). Sed se mi kredas je Google, vi sole markiis finstacio, kaj la paĝo estas pri finstacio kaj ekstacio. Ĉu vere?

Multe dankon kaj bonan tagon, Kvardek du (talk) 15:39, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dankon pro atento (kaj eo, ho kiom longe mi gxin ne praktikis). Jes, mi certas pri la traduko, en la ruso gxi signifas ankaux "ekstremajxo" (bastono havas 2 tiaj ajxoj). Mi rekomendas na Yandex kiel tradukilo pri la rusa https://slovari.yandex.ru/terninus/перевод/ --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 15:52, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perfekte! Multe dankon kaj ĝis revido. Kvardek du (talk) 16:22, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

bi(bli)ography

[edit]

Hey, first of all, thank you for adding a Russian label to MTMT author ID (P2492) (and to many others), but are you sure it's correct? My Russian is less than basic but "биография" seems like "biografiya" (biography, description of someone's life) instead of bibliography (list of their [scientific] works). – Máté (talk) 07:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right. Brilliant note. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 07:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request

[edit]

Hello.

Could you create the article en:Elections in Azerbaijan in Russian?

Thank you.

31.200.17.117 22:12, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I don't feel myself strong enough in the subject. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 06:41, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

БРЭ

[edit]

Добрый день, спасибо за добавление кодов БРЭ. Заметил невалидный код: [3]. Не знаете случаем, можно ли как-то получить полный список статей в БРЭ с их идентификаторами? — Ivan A. Krestinin (talk) 11:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Добрый день. Спасибо за замечание. Не могу понять причины несоответствия, похоже, это просто ошибка копирования - исправил. Около года назад я загрузил словник всех статей с сайта БРЭ и отправил его в Mix'n'Match tool для помощи в простановке связей [4]. С этой страницы можно загрузить список обратно в файл, насколько я помню. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 06:13, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Всемирная выставка 1904 года

[edit]

I know this is years ago, but I just noticed this edit of yours. Not sure what you were trying to do, and if you remember and it's something you still want to do, you certainly need to re-try. - Jmabel (talk) 22:50, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I tried to indicate it's a World Expo instance, but made a typo. Thank you for remark. --Alexander Sigachov (talk) 06:11, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New page for catalogues

[edit]

Hi, I created a new page for collecting sites that could be added to Mix'n'match and I plan to expand it with the ones that already have scrapers by category. Feel free to expand, use for property creation. Best, --Adam Harangozó (talk) 11:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Botik

[edit]

Hi, Александр Сигачёв, The last edit by your bot Botik dates from January 21st, 2018. I would propose to remove its bot flag due to inactivity. Do you oppose to that? Of course you can always reapply for a bot flag, once you would want to reactivate it. --Lymantria (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As you didn't react to this question, I take it that you do not object to removal, so I will remove the flag. Of course you can reapply for the flag any time. --Lymantria (talk) 07:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]