Skip to content

refactor(repl): optimize shell_exec and REPL loop for clarity and eff… #6058

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

haffizaliraza
Copy link

@haffizaliraza haffizaliraza commented Aug 1, 2025

…iciency

refactor(repl): optimize shell_exec and REPL loop for clarity and efficiency

  • Consolidated error matching in shell_exec to reduce branching and improve maintainability
  • Reorganized REPL loop to simplify control flow and minimize repeated logic
  • Improved string handling to reduce unnecessary

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved error handling and control flow in the interactive shell for clearer prompts and more accurate feedback on input errors.
    • Streamlined history file management and prompt display for a smoother user experience.
    • Enhanced handling of keyboard interrupts and end-of-file situations, resulting in more intuitive shell behavior.

…iciency

refactor(repl): optimize shell_exec and REPL loop for clarity and efficiency

- Consolidated error matching in `shell_exec` to reduce branching and improve maintainability
- Reorganized REPL loop to simplify control flow and minimize repeated logic
- Improved string handling to reduce unnecessary
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes refactor and simplify error handling and control flow in the REPL logic within src/shell.rs. Pattern matching for parsing and lexical errors is consolidated, redundant variables and nested conditions are removed, and prompt and history path retrievals are streamlined. No public API signatures are altered.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Shell Error Handling & REPL Refactor
src/shell.rs
Refactored error handling in shell_exec to consolidate and clarify pattern matching for parse and lexical errors. Simplified prompt, history file path, and REPL loop control flow. Improved state management and exception printing. No changes to public function signatures.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~15 minutes

Poem

In the shell, where errors once nested deep,
The code now flows with clarity to keep.
Prompts and paths, now easy to find,
Less tangled state, more peace of mind.
A rabbit hops through REPL’s new delight—
Simpler, cleaner, shining bright!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4841776 and e67bf9f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/shell.rs (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (.github/copilot-instructions.md)

**/*.rs: Follow the default rustfmt code style (cargo fmt to format)
Always run clippy to lint code (cargo clippy) before completing tasks. Fix any warnings or lints that are introduced by your changes
Follow Rust best practices for error handling and memory management
Use the macro system (pyclass, pymodule, pyfunction, etc.) when implementing Python functionality in Rust

Files:

  • src/shell.rs
🧠 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: RustPython/RustPython#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T03:16:56.511Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Follow Rust best practices for error handling and memory management
📚 Learning: applies to **/*.rs : follow rust best practices for error handling and memory management...
Learnt from: CR
PR: RustPython/RustPython#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T03:16:56.511Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Follow Rust best practices for error handling and memory management

Applied to files:

  • src/shell.rs
📚 Learning: applies to **/*.rs : use the macro system (`pyclass`, `pymodule`, `pyfunction`, etc.) when implement...
Learnt from: CR
PR: RustPython/RustPython#0
File: .github/copilot-instructions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-07-19T03:16:56.511Z
Learning: Applies to **/*.rs : Use the macro system (`pyclass`, `pymodule`, `pyfunction`, etc.) when implementing Python functionality in Rust

Applied to files:

  • src/shell.rs
🔇 Additional comments (9)
src/shell.rs (9)

3-9: Import reorganization looks good.

The explicit imports for error types support the cleaner pattern matching in the refactored code.


28-37: Excellent use of functional error handling.

The refactored Ok branch using map and unwrap_or_else is more idiomatic and concise than the previous if-else structure.


39-89: Well-structured error pattern matching.

The consolidated error handling with direct pattern matching on ParseErrorType and LexicalErrorType significantly improves readability and maintainability. The removal of the bad_error boolean in favor of direct result returns makes the control flow much clearer.


50-56: Potential edge case in triple-quote detection.

The logic for detecting triple-quoted strings skips to the error location and checks for three consecutive quotes. However, this might not correctly handle all edge cases, such as when the quotes are escaped or when there are spaces between quotes.

Consider verifying this logic handles various quote scenarios correctly:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
# Test various unclosed string scenarios
test_cases = [
    '"""unclosed triple',
    "'''unclosed triple",
    '"unclosed single',
    '"\\"unclosed with escape',
    '" " "spaced quotes',
]

for test in test_cases:
    print(f"Testing: {test!r}")
    try:
        compile(test, '<stdin>', 'exec')
    except SyntaxError as e:
        print(f"  Error: {e}")

101-103: Clean functional approach for history path construction.

The chained map and unwrap_or_else pattern is more idiomatic than the previous match statement.


113-115: Concise prompt retrieval logic.

The single expression using and_then, map, and unwrap_or effectively handles all the edge cases while being more readable.


133-147: Simplified control flow in the main REPL loop.

The refactored match arms with direct state transitions and inline error printing make the REPL logic much easier to follow. The removal of redundant clearing of continuing_block when it's already false (line 135-138) is a good optimization.


149-163: Improved interrupt and error handling.

Printing exceptions directly instead of propagating them as errors is appropriate for a REPL context. The merged EOF and error cases (lines 157-163) reduce code duplication.


1-170: Manual style and lint verification required

The sandbox environment couldn’t run rustfmt or clippy due to missing /proc. Please verify locally that the changes conform to our style guidelines and introduce no new warnings:

  • Run cargo fmt -- --check src/shell.rs and fix any formatting issues.
  • Run cargo clippy --all-targets -- -D warnings and address all lints.
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Member

@youknowone youknowone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please describe your purpose in details.

  • What exactly did you optimize?
  • Why each comment is removed?
  • Why did you change each part?

Did you test the build after patch?

None => ".repl_history.txt".into(),
};
let repl_history_path = dirs::config_dir()
.map(|mut path| { path.push("rustpython/repl_history.txt"); path })
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this also windows(backslash) compatible?

@@ -26,211 +22,148 @@ fn shell_exec(
empty_line_given: bool,
continuing_block: bool,
) -> ShellExecResult {
// compiling expects only UNIX style line endings, and will replace windows line endings
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this comment outdated?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants