Skip to content

fix: remove exposed credentials from shopping example #2515

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

gopinaath
Copy link

@gopinaath gopinaath commented Jul 22, 2025

Summary

This PR removes exposed credentials from the shopping.py example file for security reasons.

Changes

  • Replaced hardcoded email (nikoskalio.dev@gmail.com) with placeholder <your-email@example.com>
  • Replaced hardcoded password with placeholder <your-password>

Security Impact

This removes potentially sensitive information from the public repository. The exposed credentials should be rotated if they are still in use.

Test plan

This is a documentation/example change only - no functional code was modified.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code


Summary by cubic

Removed hardcoded email and password from the shopping.py example and replaced them with placeholder values to prevent exposing credentials.

Replace hardcoded email and password with placeholder values in shopping.py example.
This removes potentially sensitive information from the public repository.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Jul 22, 2025

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ pirate
❌ sringopi
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Copy link
Contributor

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cubic analysis

No issues found across 1 file. Review in cubic

@pirate
Copy link
Member

pirate commented Jul 22, 2025

can you sign the CLA? then down to merge, thanks

(original credentials are invalid btw, so it's not exposing much)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants