Skip to content

DEV: Enable local-storage for smoke test #34060

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2025
Merged

Conversation

davidtaylorhq
Copy link
Member

The localStorage API has been a web standard for a very long time. It's safe to assume it'll be available in all users browsers, so it makes sense for the smoke test to match.

Also adds console logs to the smoke-test output, to make debugging failures easier.

The localStorage API has been a web standard for a very long time. It's safe to assume it'll be available in all users browsers, so it makes sense for the smoke test to match.

Also adds console logs to the smoke-test output, to make debugging failures easier.
Copy link
Contributor

@nattsw nattsw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks ok. Is local storage purged per test?

@davidtaylorhq
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, I believe puppeteer creates a fresh browser context each time

@davidtaylorhq davidtaylorhq merged commit 2fc4b34 into main Aug 4, 2025
15 checks passed
@davidtaylorhq davidtaylorhq deleted the enable-local-storage branch August 4, 2025 10:01
martin-brennan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 5, 2025
The localStorage API has been a web standard for a very long time. It's
safe to assume it'll be available in all users browsers, so it makes
sense for the smoke test to match.

Also adds console logs to the smoke-test output, to make debugging
failures easier.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants