Skip to content

refactor: benchmark #19780

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

refactor: benchmark #19780

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hai-x
Copy link
Member

@hai-x hai-x commented Aug 10, 2025

No description provided.

@hai-x hai-x force-pushed the worker-benchmark branch 5 times, most recently from 8e735de to 430655e Compare August 10, 2025 15:55
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Aug 10, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #19780 will degrade performances by 41.68%

Comparing worker-benchmark (1235c28) with main (12308d5)

Summary

⚡ 7 improvements
❌ 6 regressions
✅ 20 untouched benchmarks
⁉️ 9 dropped benchmarks

⚠️ Please fix the performance issues or acknowledge them on CodSpeed.

Benchmarks breakdown

Benchmark BASE HEAD Change
benchmark "cache-filesystem", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 1.6 s 2.4 s -35.36%
benchmark "cache-filesystem", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 230.3 ms 319 ms -27.82%
benchmark "context-commonjs", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 154.2 ms 216.5 ms -28.78%
benchmark "context-commonjs", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 36 ms 61.7 ms -41.68%
benchmark "context-esm", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 395.2 ms 247.6 ms +59.61%
benchmark "context-esm", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 56.7 ms 79.7 ms -28.88%
benchmark "devtool-source-map", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 263.6 ms 361.1 ms -27%
benchmark "devtool-source-map", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 81.8 ms 64.4 ms +27.08%
benchmark "future-defaults", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 102.9 ms 76.5 ms +34.39%
benchmark "lodash", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 67.3 ms 53.3 ms +26.42%
benchmark "many-chunks-commonjs", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 106.7 ms 79.1 ms +34.85%
benchmark "many-chunks-esm", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 141.6 ms 84.7 ms +67.12%
⁉️ benchmark "many-modules-commonjs", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 330.2 ms N/A N/A
⁉️ benchmark "many-modules-commonjs", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 111.1 ms N/A N/A
⁉️ benchmark "many-modules-commonjs", scenario '{"name":"mode-production","mode":"production"}' 2.1 s N/A N/A
⁉️ benchmark "many-modules-esm", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 333.4 ms N/A N/A
⁉️ benchmark "many-modules-esm", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 112.2 ms N/A N/A
⁉️ benchmark "many-modules-esm", scenario '{"name":"mode-production","mode":"production"}' 2.5 s N/A N/A
⁉️ benchmark "react", scenario '{"name":"mode-development","mode":"development"}' 207 ms N/A N/A
⁉️ benchmark "react", scenario '{"name":"mode-development-rebuild","mode":"development","watch":true}' 83.5 ms N/A N/A
... ... ... ... ...

ℹ️ Only the first 20 benchmarks are displayed. Go to the app to view all benchmarks.

@hai-x hai-x force-pushed the worker-benchmark branch 3 times, most recently from f36cc74 to f4a9617 Compare August 10, 2025 17:41
@hai-x hai-x force-pushed the worker-benchmark branch from f4a9617 to 1235c28 Compare August 10, 2025 17:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant