Skip to content

refactor(devtools): improve router tree search UX #63107

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hawkgs
Copy link
Member

@hawkgs hawkgs commented Aug 12, 2025

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Feature

What is the new behavior?

Improve the search functionality of the router tree by making the results more distinguishable. There will be a consecutive PR in the near future that will introduce matched nodes focusing.

Screenshot 2025-08-12 at 11 19 17

@ngbot ngbot bot added this to the Backlog milestone Aug 12, 2025
Improve the search functionality of the router tree by making the results more distinguishable.
@hawkgs hawkgs force-pushed the devtools/router-tree-search-i branch from a42c6d9 to 5ec02ae Compare August 12, 2025 08:48
@hawkgs hawkgs requested a review from dgp1130 August 12, 2025 08:49
@hawkgs hawkgs added action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker target: minor This PR is targeted for the next minor release labels Aug 12, 2025
@atscott
Copy link
Contributor

atscott commented Aug 13, 2025

This PR was merged into the repository by commit 7ecf13d.

The changes were merged into the following branches: main

@atscott atscott closed this in 7ecf13d Aug 13, 2025
@hawkgs hawkgs deleted the devtools/router-tree-search-i branch August 19, 2025 06:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
action: merge The PR is ready for merge by the caretaker area: devtools target: minor This PR is targeted for the next minor release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants