Skip to content

DEV: Add a ReviewableNote model, and tie it into the Reviewable model. #33047

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jun 3, 2025

Conversation

pento
Copy link
Member

@pento pento commented Jun 3, 2025

✨ What's This?

As part of the review queue refresh, we'll be adding the ability for moderators to make notes on individual reviewable items. For example:

Since the feature will be tied into the UI refresh, this PR is solely focussed on adding the new model and associated backend code.

@pento pento self-assigned this Jun 3, 2025
@discoursebot
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on Discourse Meta. There might be relevant details there:

https://meta.discourse.org/t/staff-review-queue-turning-a-flag-to-conversation/367337/13

Co-authored-by: Alan Guo Xiang Tan <gxtan1990@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@tgxworld tgxworld left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the ReviewablesController#index route suffers from a N+1 queries problem but I don't think it needs to block this PR.

@pento pento merged commit 599404d into main Jun 3, 2025
16 checks passed
@pento pento deleted the pento/dev-add-reviewable-note-model branch June 3, 2025 23:33
martin-brennan pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 10, 2025
#33047)

As part of the review queue refresh, we'll be adding the ability for moderators to make notes on individual reviewable items. As a first step, this change adds the new model and associated backend code.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants