Skip to content

Conversation

RealOrangeOne
Copy link
Member

Trac ticket number

Semi-related to ticket-36520

Branch description

Parsing should only be done on the value. The implementation happens to work, but shouldn't depend on that working.

Checklist

  • This PR targets the main branch.
  • The commit message is written in past tense, mentions the ticket number, and ends with a period.
  • I have checked the "Has patch" ticket flag in the Trac system.
  • I have added or updated relevant tests.
  • I have added or updated relevant docs, including release notes if applicable.
  • I have attached screenshots in both light and dark modes for any UI changes.

@RealOrangeOne
Copy link
Member Author

@nessita as mentioned on ticket-36520. There aren't any new tests to cover this, but the existing suite still passes, which is a good sign!

@nessita nessita self-requested a review August 21, 2025 14:21
@RealOrangeOne RealOrangeOne force-pushed the 36520-multipart-header-parsing branch from c648505 to 72c66a1 Compare August 28, 2025 11:12
@RealOrangeOne RealOrangeOne requested a review from nessita August 28, 2025 11:16
…r_parameters for multipart requests.

Header parsing should apply only to the header value. The previous
implementation happened to work but relied on unintended behavior.
@nessita nessita force-pushed the 36520-multipart-header-parsing branch from 72c66a1 to 92a7710 Compare August 28, 2025 15:45
Copy link
Contributor

@nessita nessita left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great, thank you Jake! 🌟

@nessita nessita merged commit 41ff30f into django:main Aug 28, 2025
32 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants