CI: Expand list of packs/languages for change note validation #19700
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR updates the CodeQL pack release step to include additional language and shared packs for change note validation.
- Adds
actions,go,shared, andswiftgroups to the validation command. - Retains exclusion of
examples,test, andexperimentalpacks.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
.github/workflows/validate-change-notes.yml:34
- There's a missing comma before
-examplesin the--groupslist; it should be...,shared,swift,-examples,-test,-experimentalso that exclusions are part of the group argument.
codeql pack release --groups actions,cpp,csharp,go,java,javascript,python,ruby,shared,swift -examples,-test,-experimental
cklin
approved these changes
Jun 9, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@cklin not release-blocking but a coverage improvement we might as well include sooner.