Rust: Fix various bad joins #19725

hvitved · 2025-06-11T08:28:23Z

All bad joins were found by the inefficient join-order check in VS Code.

Before ``` Pipeline standard for PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6@5132b1w8 was evaluated in 107 iterations totaling 1217ms (delta sizes total: 870557). 568160 ~1% {2} r1 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::AssocItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#120fa1ad_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 564597 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 68670 ~1% {2} r2 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::VariantItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#12012145_project#PathResolution::ItemNod__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 68670 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#5` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 49047 ~1% {2} r3 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::StructItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f482e99c_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 49047 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#2` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 229 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::UnionItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f67c4b73_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 229 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#4` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 12207 ~0% {2} r5 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::EnumItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#03ce35b1_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 12207 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::EnumItemNode.getName/0#dispred#f21ce0ed_PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathP__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 26698 ~2% {2} r6 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ModuleItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#2fee2540_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 26698 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 6315 ~1% {2} r7 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::TraitItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#824f98e3_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 6315 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 112374 ~0% {3} r8 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanoni__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _ 112374 ~3% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 3 872046 ~1% {2} r9 = SCAN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0 777662505 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#4e7c51c6_10#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.0 150127 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.resolveSelfTy/0#dispred#cf157d04` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, _ 150127 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 1 262501 ~1% {3} r10 = r8 UNION r9 230996 ~1% {5} r11 = JOIN r10 WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, _, _ 230996 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 4, Out.4 := 0 {3} r12 = r10 AND NOT `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1) 31487 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, _ 31487 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 2, Out.4 := 0 262483 ~0% {5} r13 = r11 UNION r12 262483 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH PRIMITIVE range#bbb ON Lhs.4,Lhs.3,Lhs.2 262483 ~0% {3} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1 142807 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_PathResolution::Imp__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3 870570 ~1% {3} r14 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7 UNION r13 870566 ~1% {3} | AND NOT `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev`(FIRST 3) return r14 ``` After ``` Pipeline standard for PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6@90aba2wd was evaluated in 100 iterations totaling 28ms (delta sizes total: 870531). 568160 ~0% {2} r1 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::AssocItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#120fa1ad_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 564597 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 68670 ~0% {2} r2 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::VariantItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#12012145_project#PathResolution::ItemNod__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 68670 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#5` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 49047 ~0% {2} r3 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::StructItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f482e99c_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 49047 ~1% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#2` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 229 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::UnionItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f67c4b73_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 229 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#4` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 12207 ~1% {2} r5 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::EnumItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#03ce35b1_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 12207 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::EnumItemNode.getName/0#dispred#f21ce0ed_PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathP__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 26698 ~0% {2} r6 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ModuleItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#2fee2540_project#PathResolution::ItemNode__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 26698 ~4% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 6315 ~1% {2} r7 = JOIN `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::TraitItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#824f98e3_project#PathResolution::ItemNode.__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1 6315 ~2% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPathPrefix/1#dispred#a1d9332d#prev_PathResolution::ItemNode.g__#join_rhs#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 150127 ~0% {3} r8 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getSelfCanonicalPath/1#dispred#8ed81fbe#prev_delta` WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanonicalPath/1#dispred#4e7c51c6` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _ 150127 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 1 112374 ~1% {3} r9 = JOIN `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_delta` WITH `_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_PathResolution::ImplItemNode.hasCanoni__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, _ 112374 ~0% {3} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 3 262501 ~0% {3} r10 = r8 UNION r9 230996 ~1% {5} r11 = JOIN r10 WITH `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, _, _ 230996 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 4, Out.4 := 0 {3} r12 = r10 AND NOT `PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getTraitPath/0#dispred#3b7d1cb6_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1) 31487 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, _ 31487 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 2, Out.4 := 0 262483 ~1% {5} r13 = r11 UNION r12 262483 ~1% {5} | JOIN WITH PRIMITIVE range#bbb ON Lhs.4,Lhs.3,Lhs.2 262483 ~0% {3} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1 142772 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `__PathResolution::ImplItemNode.getCanonicalPathTraitPart/1#dispred#009a7fd0#prev_PathResolution::Imp__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3 870535 ~1% {3} r14 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7 UNION r13 870531 ~1% {3} | AND NOT `PathResolution::ItemNode.getCanonicalPath/1#dispred#f52ac1c6#prev`(FIRST 3) return r14 ```

Before ``` Evaluated relational algebra for predicate PathResolution::fileImport/2#d9e57816@c790f609 with tuple counts: 241 ~0% {3} r1 = JOIN `_Locatable::Locatable.getFile/0#dispred#f7e24934_PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032#shared` WITH `FileSystem::Folder::Append<PathResolution::shouldAppend>::append/2#beb8f79a_201#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.1 291 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::pathAttrImport/3#88463ffa_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2 14978 ~8% {2} r2 = SCAN `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` OUTPUT In.0, In.1 14978 ~8% {2} | STREAM DEDUP 14392 ~9% {2} r3 = r2 AND NOT `PathResolution::modImportNested/3#991244df_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1) 14392 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0 14355 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf_120#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2 14978 ~0% {2} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0 329862 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf_102#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Rhs.1 577 ~3% {4} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImportNestedLookup/3#6cc4b913#ffb` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0 14932 ~0% {4} r5 = r3 UNION r4 14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef#fbf` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3 14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0 15223 ~0% {2} r6 = r1 UNION r5 return r6 ``` Afer ``` Evaluated relational algebra for predicate PathResolution::fileImport/2#d9e57816@007bd81i with tuple counts: 241 ~0% {3} r1 = JOIN `_Locatable::Locatable.getFile/0#dispred#f7e24934_PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032#shared` WITH `FileSystem::Folder::Append<PathResolution::shouldAppend>::append/2#beb8f79a_201#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.1 291 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::pathAttrImport/3#88463ffa_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2 14978 ~8% {2} r2 = SCAN `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` OUTPUT In.0, In.1 14978 ~8% {2} | STREAM DEDUP 14392 ~9% {2} r3 = r2 AND NOT `PathResolution::modImportNested/3#991244df_0#antijoin_rhs`(FIRST 1) 14392 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0 14978 ~9% {3} r4 = JOIN r2 WITH `PathResolution::modImport0/3#03cccf2a` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.0, Lhs.1 577 ~0% {3} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::modImportNestedLookup/3#6cc4b913#ffb` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.0 14969 ~1% {3} r5 = r3 UNION r4 14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::fileModule/3#d6c6ceef_120#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2 14932 ~0% {2} | JOIN WITH `PathResolution::isSourceFile/1#803de032` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.0 15223 ~0% {2} r6 = r1 UNION r5 return r6 ```

Before ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4@202c46xq was evaluated in 600 iterations totaling 2282ms (delta sizes total: 5827084). 120407742 ~1% {4} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Access.getTarget/0#dispred#29d66fd1#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::accessDeclarationPositionMatch/2#6c58c89d` CARTESIAN PRODUCT OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Rhs.0, Lhs.0 6495868 ~109% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.2 {4} | AND NOT Type::TypeParameter#f85657da(FIRST 1) 3049994 ~10% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.3, In.0 7891 ~0% {5} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::explicitTypeMatch/5#98ce2c39#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3 4445 ~3% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5 4445 ~3% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5 4445 ~5% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2 3553075 ~1% {5} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::directTypeMatch/5#319f8680#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3 6860451 ~16% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5 6860451 ~19% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5 6211129 ~20% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2 115218 ~1% {5} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::typeConstraintBaseTypeMatch/5#ebeb4216#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3 181668 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5 181668 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5 181668 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2 9447236 ~16% {4} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 5902300 ~4% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4#prev`(FIRST 4) return r5 ``` Afer ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4@061316x0 was evaluated in 600 iterations totaling 1727ms (delta sizes total: 5918371). 1323162 ~0% {2} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Access.getTarget/0#dispred#29d66fd1#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0 5316637 ~152% {4} | JOIN WITH `_Type::TypeParameter#f85657da_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3 7891 ~0% {5} r2 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::explicitTypeMatch/5#98ce2c39#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3 4445 ~3% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5 4445 ~3% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5 4445 ~5% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2 3553075 ~1% {5} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::directTypeMatch/5#319f8680#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3 6860451 ~16% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5 6860451 ~19% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5 6211129 ~20% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2 115218 ~1% {5} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::typeConstraintBaseTypeMatch/5#ebeb4216#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3 181668 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `_TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatchingInput::Declaration.getDeclaredType/2#dispred#325b693f_1023#join___#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, _, _, Rhs.3, Lhs.3, _, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.4 := (In.5 ++ In.6), Tmp.7 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.8 := "", Out.4 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.4,Tmp.7,Tmp.8) KEEPING 5 181668 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, _, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := length(In.5), Tmp.6 := 10, TEST Out.4 <= Tmp.6 KEEPING 5 181668 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.3, In.2 11713879 ~62% {4} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 6210333 ~10% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::inferAccessType/3#be4695a4#prev`(FIRST 4) return r5 ```

Before ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@061312x0 was evaluated in 367 iterations totaling 3484ms (delta sizes total: 563408). 66609 ~0% {3} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.0 867138261 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_210#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1 29320 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1 {5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 29320 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.3, In.2, In.0 29320 ~0% {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _ {4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.4 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.4 KEEPING 4 29320 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, _, In.3 29320 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.4 - Tmp.3) 29296 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4 29320 ~0% {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.2, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5 0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, _, In.1, In.0, In.3 0 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0 0 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _ 0 ~0% {4} | REWRITE WITH Out.3 := 0 563353 ~1% {4} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3 563353 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, _, Lhs.3, _ {4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4 563353 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.0, In.1 258647 ~1% {5} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 102998 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.3 52485 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5 258647 ~0% {5} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.1 259340 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4 16033 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.1 {6} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 15992 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.1, In.5, In.2, In.0, In.4 68477 ~1% {6} r7 = r5 UNION r6 68477 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.5 465635 ~0% {3} r8 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput::potentialInstantiationOf/3#1239e45f#reorder_0_2_1#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.1, In.0, In.2 465635 ~0% {5} r9 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.2 465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.1 := 0 465635 ~1% {5} r10 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.0, _, Lhs.2, Lhs.3 465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0 275069 ~0% {5} r11 = JOIN r8 WITH `_TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAc__#join_rhs#1` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Rhs.1, Rhs.2 0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.3, _ 0 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.1 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5 0 ~0% {5} r12 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.4, In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3 465635 ~1% {5} r13 = r10 UNION r12 94444 ~1% {6} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0 6 ~20% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5 465635 ~0% {5} r14 = JOIN r9 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthPath/2#8b978a80` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, _, Lhs.3, Lhs.4 465635 ~1% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0 0 ~0% {5} r15 = SCAN r11 OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1, In.3, In.4 465635 ~1% {5} r16 = r14 UNION r15 465635 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1_021#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.4 465635 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.0 {6} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 465629 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.4, In.3, In.5, In.0 465635 ~1% {6} r17 = r13 UNION r16 465635 ~1% {4} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.3 563408 ~1% {4} r18 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r7 UNION r17 563408 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4) return r18 ``` After ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9@e8671bx7 was evaluated in 376 iterations totaling 245ms (delta sizes total: 563353). 563353 ~1% {6} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, _, In.3, _ 563353 ~1% {4} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (Tmp.3 + In.4), Tmp.5 := 0, TEST Out.3 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 4 259340 ~1% {5} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Rhs.5, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3 52485 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4 259340 ~1% {6} r3 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3 16033 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5 {5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 15992 ~0% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4 741397 ~1% {7} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _ 465635 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 = Tmp.6 KEEPING 6 465635 ~1% {5} r5 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.1, In.5, In.0, In.2, _ 465635 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0 741397 ~1% {7} r6 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _ 275762 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.3 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6 0 ~0% {7} r7 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.6), TEST Out.6 = InOut.5 0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.4, In.0, In.2, In.3 465635 ~0% {5} r8 = r5 UNION r7 6 ~0% {4} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4 29310 ~0% {5} r9 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::resolveTypeAt/5#77e2181d#reorder_0_4_5_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5 29310 ~0% {6} r10 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 = Tmp.5 KEEPING 5 0 ~0% {5} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.1, In.0, In.3, _ 0 ~0% {5} | REWRITE WITH Out.4 := 0 29310 ~0% {6} r11 = SCAN r9 OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _ {5} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 0, TEST InOut.4 != Tmp.5 KEEPING 5 29310 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, _, In.1, In.4 29310 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.3 := 1, Out.3 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.3) 29241 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.5 29241 ~0% {5} r12 = r10 UNION r11 {5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 29241 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4 465635 ~0% {6} r13 = SCAN r4 OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, _ 465635 ~1% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0 0 ~0% {8} r14 = JOIN r6 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.3, _ {8} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.3 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6 0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.4, In.5, In.1, In.2, In.3 465635 ~1% {6} r15 = r13 UNION r14 465635 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.2, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5 {5} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 465629 ~1% {4} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.0, In.3, In.4 563353 ~1% {4} r16 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r8 UNION r12 UNION r15 563353 ~1% {4} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypesFromIndex/4#716280b9#prev`(FIRST 4) return r16 ```

Before ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@e8671rw7 was evaluated in 378 iterations totaling 313ms (delta sizes total: 168323). 462477 ~1% {7} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3 993561 ~2% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6 993561 ~38% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3 {7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 772102 ~427% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.3, In.4, In.5, In.2, In.6, In.1 56885 ~1% {4} r2 = SCAN TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#prev_delta OUTPUT In.3, In.0, In.1, In.2 0 ~0% {7} r3 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Rhs.3 0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6 0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.3 {7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1 462477 ~1% {8} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3 993561 ~39% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.3 23413 ~1% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8 2817 ~7% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2 11550 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1 {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7 2397 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7 2397 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7 2397 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.0, In.5, In.4 66727 ~0% {6} r5 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::MkRelevantAccess#8a6252ad#reorder_3_0_1_2#prev ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3 19305359 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4 3454881 ~1% {10} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.6, Lhs.8, Rhs.1, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7 753104 ~1% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a_01243#join_rhs` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, Lhs.9, Rhs.4 32040 ~18% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Lhs.8, _, Rhs.2, Lhs.2 {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7 13192 ~54% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7 13192 ~54% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7 13192 ~55% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0 0 ~0% {8} r6 = JOIN r2 WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::hasConstraintMention/5#8730ee97#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.4, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Rhs.3 0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::BaseTypes::conditionSatisfiesConstraintTypeAt/5#e92dcc7a` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.7, Rhs.3 0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.6, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.7, Lhs.8 0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeMention::TypeMention.resolveTypeAt/1#dispred#a125c821#bff#reorder_0_2_1` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.7, Rhs.2 0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1 {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7 0 ~0% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7 0 ~0% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7 0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4 787691 ~403% {6} r7 = r1 UNION r3 UNION r4 UNION r5 UNION r6 212766 ~54% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6) return r7 ``` After ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324@9c099xwn was evaluated in 380 iterations totaling 11ms (delta sizes total: 153004). 768937 ~1% {7} r1 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention0/9#c82a4f76#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.5, In.8, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.7 {7} | AND NOT `Type::TypeAbstraction.getATypeParameter/0#dispred#030257a0`(FIRST 2) 745524 ~423% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1 26916 ~0% {9} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Rhs.5, _, Rhs.6, Lhs.1 {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7 8530 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, _, In.5, In.6, _, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7 8530 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7 8530 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, In.0 11763 ~1% {9} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention1/7#b265d17e#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Rhs.2, _, Lhs.6, Rhs.1 {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := "", Out.6 := InverseAppend(In.7,Tmp.6,In.8) KEEPING 7 2461 ~1% {11} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, _, _, In.4, In.6, _, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.6 := (In.7 ++ In.8), Tmp.9 := "[0-9]+", Tmp.10 := "", Out.6 := regexpReplaceAll(Tmp.6,Tmp.9,Tmp.10) KEEPING 7 2461 ~1% {9} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.5, _, In.6, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.6 := length(In.7), Tmp.8 := 10, TEST Out.6 <= Tmp.8 KEEPING 7 2461 ~1% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.5, In.4 756515 ~396% {6} r4 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 155599 ~6% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::satisfiesConstraintTypeMention/6#69a92324#prev`(FIRST 6) return r4 ```

Before ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@9c099swn was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 154ms (delta sizes total: 0). 16307861 ~1% {5} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Rhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Rhs.1 37736 ~1% {7} r2 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _ {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6 0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.3, In.4, In.1, _, In.5 0 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (InOut.6 - Tmp.5) 0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 6 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.6 0 ~0% {8} r3 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, _, Lhs.5, _ {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6 0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4 0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2 0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6 12808446 ~1% {5} r4 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::satisfiesConcreteTypes/3#3b2e26a8#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 1 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Rhs.1, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Rhs.2 22081 ~1% {7} r5 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _ {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 0, TEST InOut.5 != Tmp.6 KEEPING 6 0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5 0 ~0% {8} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev` ON FIRST 5 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.3, Lhs.5, Rhs.5, _ {8} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 1, Out.7 := (InOut.5 - Tmp.7), TEST Out.7 = InOut.6 0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.4, In.3, In.5 22081 ~1% {8} r6 = JOIN r4 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7 22081 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.5, _, In.3, In.0, In.1, In.4 22081 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0 22081 ~0% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6 0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, _ 0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0 37736 ~1% {8} r7 = JOIN r1 WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789_0312#join_rhs` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.7 := 0, TEST InOut.6 = Tmp.7 KEEPING 7 37736 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, _, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3 37736 ~0% {7} | REWRITE WITH Out.2 := 0 37736 ~1% {5} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.6 0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `project#TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789#3` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.2, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.3, _ 0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0 0 ~0% {6} r8 = r2 UNION r3 UNION r5 UNION r6 UNION r7 0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6) return r8 ``` After ``` Pipeline standard for TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48@81728ywe was evaluated in 375 iterations totaling 2ms (delta sizes total: 0). 0 ~0% {6} r1 = JOIN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Rhs.2, _ 0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0 0 ~0% {6} r2 = JOIN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase/5#56e8595e#reorder_0_4_1_2_3#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, Lhs.2, _ 0 ~0% {6} | REWRITE WITH Out.5 := 0 66609 ~1% {3} r3 = SCAN `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.2, In.1 0 ~0% {9} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#reorder_0_4_1_2_3_5#prev` ON FIRST 2 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.2, Lhs.1, Rhs.2, Rhs.3, Rhs.4, _, Rhs.5, _ {7} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.6 := 1, Out.6 := (Tmp.6 + In.7), Tmp.8 := 0, TEST Out.6 != Tmp.8 KEEPING 7 0 ~0% {7} | SCAN OUTPUT In.4, In.5, In.6, In.1, In.0, In.2, In.3 0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 4 OUTPUT Lhs.4, Lhs.6, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.5, Lhs.2 0 ~0% {8} r4 = SCAN `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev_delta` OUTPUT In.0, In.1, In.2, In.3, In.4, _, In.5, _ {6} | REWRITE WITH Tmp.5 := 1, Out.5 := (Tmp.5 + In.6), Tmp.7 := 0, TEST Out.5 != Tmp.7 KEEPING 6 0 ~0% {6} | SCAN OUTPUT In.2, In.3, In.5, In.0, In.1, In.4 0 ~0% {7} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::AwaitExprMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::getNthTypeParameterPath/3#c3ea2789` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.3, Rhs.3, Lhs.5, Lhs.4, Lhs.0, Lhs.1, Lhs.2 0 ~0% {6} | JOIN WITH `TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess.getTypeAt/1#dispred#3a89868c#prev` ON FIRST 3 OUTPUT Lhs.0, Lhs.3, Lhs.4, Lhs.5, Lhs.2, Lhs.6 0 ~0% {6} r5 = r1 UNION r2 UNION r3 UNION r4 0 ~0% {6} | AND NOT `TypeInference::M2::IsInstantiationOf<TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::RelevantAccess,TypeInference::CallExprBaseMatching::AccessConstraint::IsInstantiationOfInput>::typeParametersEqualFromIndex/6#6471ea48#prev`(FIRST 6) return r5 ```

Copilot

Pull Request Overview

This PR refactors CodeQL predicates to address inefficient join orders and bad joins in both the type inference and Rust path resolution modules.

Centralizes and streamlines type resolution by introducing resolveNthTypeAt and reorganizing satisfies* predicates.
Adds new helper predicates for constraint mention resolution and simplifies getDeclaredType calls.
Factors out getSelfCanonicalPath, optimizes module resolution with an inline predicate, and updates fileImport to use it.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll	Refactored concrete‐type predicates, introduced `resolveNthTypeAt`, added constraint predicates, removed magic pragmas from `getDeclaredType` calls.
rust/ql/lib/codeql/rust/internal/PathResolution.qll	Factored out `getSelfCanonicalPath`, added `fileModuleInlineLate` with `inline_late`, and updated `fileImport` to use it.

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (5)

shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll:473

[nitpick] The name typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase is a bit vague. You might rename it to something like allEarlierTypeParamsEqual to better convey its purpose.

private predicate typeParametersEqualFromIndexBase(

shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll:1074

This new helper predicate has nontrivial logic but no doc comment. Consider adding a brief description of its role and parameters to improve readability.

predicate satisfiesConstraintTypeMention0(

shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll:427

The newly introduced resolveNthTypeAt function drives several downstream predicates—consider adding tests to cover its core resolution logic and edge cases.

private Type resolveNthTypeAt(

rust/ql/lib/codeql/rust/internal/PathResolution.qll:1008

[nitpick] The new fileModuleInlineLate duplicates fileModule functionality. Consider documenting the performance benefits of the inline version or collapsing them to avoid duplication.

private predicate fileModuleInlineLate(SourceFile f, string name, Folder folder) {

rust/ql/lib/codeql/rust/internal/PathResolution.qll:1006

[nitpick] The standalone bindingset[name, folder] before the inline_late pragma is unusual. Consider grouping all predicate configuration pragmas together for clarity.

bindingset[name, folder]

aschackmull

LGTM!

paldepind · 2025-06-12T07:03:53Z

shared/typeinference/codeql/typeinference/internal/TypeInference.qll

-        App app, TypeAbstraction abs, TypeMention tm, TypePath path
+      pragma[nomagic]
+      private Type resolveNthTypeAt(
+        App app, TypeAbstraction abs, TypeMention tm, int i, TypePath path


Is this not a "big" relation to nomagic? It joins all the apps with the paths of all related type mentions. I would've thought it should be late inlined or something of that sort?

hvitved added 6 commits June 11, 2025 09:15

github-actions bot added the Rust Pull requests that update Rust code label Jun 11, 2025

hvitved marked this pull request as ready for review June 11, 2025 10:40

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 11, 2025 10:40

hvitved requested a review from a team as a code owner June 11, 2025 10:40

hvitved requested a review from paldepind June 11, 2025 10:40

Copilot AI reviewed Jun 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

hvitved added the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label Jun 11, 2025

aschackmull approved these changes Jun 11, 2025

View reviewed changes

hvitved merged commit 31770ed into github:main Jun 11, 2025
41 of 42 checks passed

hvitved deleted the rust/fix-bad-joins branch June 11, 2025 12:51

paldepind reviewed Jun 12, 2025

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Uh oh!

Rust: Fix various bad joins #19725

Rust: Fix various bad joins #19725

Uh oh!

hvitved commented Jun 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Uh oh!

aschackmull left a comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

paldepind Jun 12, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Rust: Fix various bad joins #19725

Rust: Fix various bad joins #19725

Uh oh!

Conversation

hvitved commented Jun 11, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Pull Request Overview

Reviewed Changes

Uh oh!

aschackmull left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

paldepind Jun 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

hvitved commented Jun 11, 2025 •

edited

Loading