Skip to content

Conversation

thetechnick
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 30, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 30, 2025
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 30, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 90c2871
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/68ac0de6d646b3000894e03e
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1946--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Comment on lines 195 to 238
hasher.Reset()

printer := spew.ConfigState{
Indent: " ",
SortKeys: true,
DisableMethods: true,
SpewKeys: true,
}
if _, err := printer.Fprintf(hasher, "%#v", objectToWrite); err != nil {
panic(err)
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this an OLM-ism or a boxcutter-ism? I wonder if json.NewEncoder(hasher).Encode(objectToWrite) would be better?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 7, 2025
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the poc-boxcutter branch 2 times, most recently from 1c23866 to dc66501 Compare July 15, 2025 11:12
@perdasilva perdasilva changed the title POC: Implement Boxcutter ✨ Implement Boxcutter Jul 15, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 70.13388% with 290 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 71.87%. Comparing base (35bcd7a) to head (ae9d77c).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...controllers/clusterextensionrevision_controller.go 78.17% 54 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️
api/v1/zz_generated.deepcopy.go 46.49% 56 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
internal/operator-controller/applier/boxcutter.go 71.58% 33 Missing and 19 partials ⚠️
...perator-controller/rukpak/util/testing/bundlefs.go 0.00% 42 Missing ⚠️
cmd/operator-controller/main.go 74.66% 25 Missing and 13 partials ⚠️
internal/operator-controller/applier/helm.go 57.14% 10 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
internal/operator-controller/applier/preflight.go 40.00% 8 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...troller/controllers/clusterextension_controller.go 94.28% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1946      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.75%   71.87%   -0.88%     
==========================================
  Files          79       84       +5     
  Lines        7340     8132     +792     
==========================================
+ Hits         5340     5845     +505     
- Misses       1653     1892     +239     
- Partials      347      395      +48     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 40.19% <14.42%> (?)
experimental-e2e 44.30% <58.66%> (-10.62%) ⬇️
unit 56.34% <41.09%> (-1.89%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the poc-boxcutter branch 6 times, most recently from 35cdf3b to 370bac6 Compare July 21, 2025 16:28
@perdasilva perdasilva force-pushed the poc-boxcutter branch 9 times, most recently from 4f39c38 to 842037e Compare July 23, 2025 15:27
Per Goncalves da Silva and others added 17 commits August 19, 2025 16:32
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Per Goncalves da Silva <pegoncal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
…re component

Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Short <tshort@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Short <tshort@redhat.com>
Ensure informers are started before reconciling and stopped before
removing the finalizer.
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 19, 2025
…on annotations

Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
This change accommodates the possibility of a revision that is currently
rolling out, which is possible for appliers that perform rollouts
asynchronously.

Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
…conciliation

Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Aug 22, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Defines a set of phases which facilitate a smoother installation vs applying every resource in the bundle all at once.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Franz <dfranz@redhat.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants