Skip to content

🌱 Makefile: add test-upgrade-experimental-e2e #2151

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

Description

Adds a make task and github workflow for running upgrade tests against the experimental e2e release. The intent is for this to be an "informing" job pre-merge, not a blocking job.

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@joelanford joelanford requested a review from a team as a code owner August 15, 2025 13:30
Copy link

netlify bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 1e615d8
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/689f5a6e9039cc0008ee8593
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2151--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@@ -90,9 +90,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL_MANIFEST := ./manifests/experimental.yaml
EXPERIMENTAL_E2E_MANIFEST := ./manifests/experimental-e2e.yaml
CATALOGS_MANIFEST := ./manifests/default-catalogs.yaml

# Manifest used by kind-deploy, which may be overridden by other targets
SOURCE_MANIFEST := $(STANDARD_MANIFEST)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removing this is likely breaking things in multiple places (there are a number of failures)

@@ -324,7 +337,6 @@ kind-load: $(KIND) #EXHELP Loads the currently constructed images into the KIND
$(CONTAINER_RUNTIME) save $(CATD_IMG) | $(KIND) load image-archive /dev/stdin --name $(KIND_CLUSTER_NAME)

.PHONY: kind-deploy
kind-deploy: export MANIFEST := $(STANDARD_RELEASE_MANIFEST)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deleting this causes two issues:

  1. You are redirecting into nothing on L331
  2. The envsubst command doesn't have a value on L333

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It does not appear to be carried over from setting it in test-upgrade-e2e, etc.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Aug 15, 2025

Yeah, the "experimental-e2e" is using the standard manifest... which is plainly wrong...

@joelanford joelanford force-pushed the experimental-upgrade-e2e branch from be4e87e to b066e72 Compare August 15, 2025 15:01
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
@joelanford joelanford force-pushed the experimental-upgrade-e2e branch from b066e72 to 1e615d8 Compare August 15, 2025 16:03
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 15, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.73%. Comparing base (0e0e706) to head (1e615d8).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2151      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   72.79%   72.73%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          79       79              
  Lines        7340     7340              
==========================================
- Hits         5343     5339       -4     
- Misses       1651     1654       +3     
- Partials      346      347       +1     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 44.38% <ø> (ø)
experimental-e2e 55.00% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
unit 58.22% <ø> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joelanford
Copy link
Member Author

Ok, I think I have it fixed up. Will double check that the correct manifests are being used for each job...

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Aug 15, 2025

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 15, 2025
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 15, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 15, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit eebdcea into operator-framework:main Aug 15, 2025
23 checks passed
@joelanford joelanford deleted the experimental-upgrade-e2e branch August 15, 2025 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants