-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.1k
GH-131296: fix clang-cl warning on Windows in socketmodule.c #131821
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
@@ -3237,7 +3231,7 @@ sock_setsockopt(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) | |||
&level, &optname, &flag)) { | |||
#ifdef MS_WINDOWS | |||
if (optname == SIO_TCP_SET_ACK_FREQUENCY) { | |||
int dummy; | |||
DWORD dummy; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
fix warning : incompatible pointer types passing 'int *' to parameter of type 'LPDWORD' (aka 'unsigned long *') [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
Modules/socketmodule.c
Outdated
@@ -6066,8 +6060,10 @@ socket_gethostbyname_ex(PyObject *self, PyObject *args) | |||
#ifdef USE_GETHOSTBYNAME_LOCK | |||
PyThread_acquire_lock(netdb_lock, 1); | |||
#endif | |||
SUPPRESS_DEPRECATED_CALL | |||
_Py_COMP_DIAG_PUSH |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The rest of the PR cares about deprecation warnings like
..\Modules\socketmodule.c(6070,9): warning : 'gethostbyname' is deprecated:
Use getaddrinfo() or GetAddrInfoW() instead or define _WINSOCK_DEPRECATED_NO_WARNINGS
to disable deprecated API warnings [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
https://github.com/python/cpython/actions/runs/14044831663/job/39366560293?pr=131690#step:4:183
using the already existing infrastructure _Py_COMP_DIAG_PUSH
et al. from pyport.h
, because clang-cl unfortunately does not (yet) respect
# define SUPPRESS_DEPRECATED_CALL __pragma(warning(suppress: 4996))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there another way to spell the pragma that will work? The idea of pyport.h
is to deal with compiler differences as much as possible, so it's the place to handle it if the original macro can be made to work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
clang-cl does not understand suppress
, hence I need to push and pop and thus used the existing infrastructure from pyport.h
(warning(disable: 4996)
)
Lines 308 to 311 in 0045100
#elif defined(_MSC_VER) | |
#define _Py_COMP_DIAG_PUSH __pragma(warning(push)) | |
#define _Py_COMP_DIAG_IGNORE_DEPR_DECLS __pragma(warning(disable: 4996)) | |
#define _Py_COMP_DIAG_POP __pragma(warning(pop)) |
Likewise, AFAIK, there is no supress
in gcc / "regular" clang, so we need to always push / pop there.
I am pretty sure that failing of Ubuntu (free-threading) / build and test (ubuntu-24.04) (pull_request) is unrelated to the PR. |
@zooba May I ask you for a review? |
Modules/socketmodule.c
Outdated
_Py_COMP_DIAG_POP | ||
#endif /* HAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME_R */ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: Two space indents of preprocessor directives might be uncommon in CPython except when a line starts with #
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I indented everywhere by two spaces to easier spot the macros, but I will happily indent by four spaces if this is preferred.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer to avoid thinking of the intention when reading, so +1 for four spaces.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done. I had a look at the other occurrences in the code base: either no indentation or like the code they guard.
I switched to the latter.
LGTM. I'll merge after CI is done unless something else comes up (or if someone else sees this and can merge, go ahead) |
I think this is a skip news?