-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.1k
gh-135361: update documentation for remote_debugger_script
audit event
#135362
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…t event Signed-off-by: Manjusaka <me@manjusaka.me>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The audit event is logged in Python/ceval_gil.c
:
static inline void run_remote_debugger_script(PyObject *path)
{
if (0 != PySys_Audit("remote_debugger_script", "O", path)) {
PyErr_FormatUnraisable(
"Audit hook failed for remote debugger script %U", path);
return;
}
...
cc @pablogsal |
I misunderstood the audit event. It's recorded by the debugged process. The documentation should clarify that.
@@ -1933,6 +1933,8 @@ always available. Unless explicitly noted otherwise, all variables are read-only | |||
interpreter is pre-release (alpha, beta, or release candidate) then the | |||
local and remote interpreters must be the same exact version. | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I misunderstood the audit event. It's recorded by the debugged process. The documentation should clarify that.
Or maybe the audit event should also be logged by the process which calls sys.remote_exec()
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We can do both no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can update and add more info, BTW I think we can logged the event at both side
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should get an audit event in sys.remote_exec()
yes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we need a new issue for that
Fix #135361